![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: aether, whatever |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
harry wrote:
"Aatu Koskensilta" wrote in message .. . How does my last claim suggest that "Lorentz and Einstein as well as Dirac were "crackpots""? They were proponents of the existence of some kind of ether. Did they also present crackpot "theories" of whatever? How dare you belittle the work of Freitznautzer! I don't talk about his work, but if he disagreed with my above statement then I dare to respectfully disagree. It seems you're entirely unfamiliar with the history of physical research on asparaguses and whatever . The following article is a wonderful introduction: E.R. Fnoggle: Asparaguses or whatever - the great Gwobbul-Freitznautzer debate of 1875 Journal of Silly Studies, 48 (2), 1982, p. 543 - 243 In contrast, how do you dare to belittle the opinions of Lorentz, Einstein as well as Dirac? I have said nothing about the opinions of Lorentz, Einstein or Dirac. -- Aatu Koskensilta ) "Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... harry wrote: "Aatu Koskensilta" wrote in message .. . How does my last claim suggest that "Lorentz and Einstein as well as Dirac were "crackpots""? They were proponents of the existence of some kind of ether. Did they also present crackpot "theories" of whatever? I don't think so - do you? How dare you belittle the work of Freitznautzer! I don't talk about his work, but if he disagreed with my above statement then I dare to respectfully disagree. It seems you're entirely unfamiliar with the history of physical research on asparaguses and whatever . You are very right about that! The following article is a wonderful introduction: E.R. Fnoggle: Asparaguses or whatever - the great Gwobbul-Freitznautzer debate of 1875 Journal of Silly Studies, 48 (2), 1982, p. 543 - 243 I'm afraid that my university isn't subscribed to such journals... In contrast, how do you dare to belittle the opinions of Lorentz, Einstein as well as Dirac? I have said nothing about the opinions of Lorentz, Einstein or Dirac. True. Neither did I say anything about Freitznauer. Cheers, Harald -- Aatu Koskensilta ) "Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen" - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| aether must be kept here | Uncle Al | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | August 10th 05 05:49 PM |
| Aether, Aether, Burning Bright | Guess Who | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | June 6th 05 08:03 AM |
| Aether, Aether, Burning Bright | Guess Who | The Theory of Relativity | 2 | June 6th 05 08:03 AM |
| SR is An Aether Theory...and there is NO aether. | Henri Wilson | The Theory of Relativity | 76 | March 11th 05 10:14 AM |
| Aether | T. Sean Weintz | Physics - General (alternative forum) | 20 | July 18th 04 02:19 AM |