With or of neutrality, repulsion? Dual nature?

GLB

"G. L. Bradford" wrote in message
m...
With or of neutrality, repulsion? Dual nature?

GLB

Or could be dual nature of neutrality be, neutrality = (attraction |
repulsion)?

GLB

For the time being, along that matter of a nature, only and only, one and
only one thing is a possible to be done, and it is that, to pay a just an
appropriate attention for an any eventual observation, along any phenomenal
reactions.

However, which it can happen everyday, along a different proportions, but
not at all in the same a portion of the space, whether along the matter of a
time it would deal along a billions and a billions of years any different
reaction along any phenomenon.

Therefore, as it woud reduce, especially any attempt, whether, along an
infinitesimal coefficient to zero, as along any probability attempt for an
any eventual estimation along that matter, definitely as a matter a fact.

--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Best Regards!


"G. L. Bradford" wrote in message
...

"G. L. Bradford" wrote in message
m...
With or of neutrality, repulsion? Dual nature?

GLB

Or could be dual nature of neutrality be, neutrality = (attraction |
repulsion)?

GLB

G. L. Bradford wrote:
With or of neutrality, repulsion? Dual nature?

Um... yes? No? What was the question again?

-- Ben

G. L. Bradford wrote:
With or of neutrality, repulsion? Dual nature?

GLB

G.L.,

I have modeled "strong force" in a way where "inertial attraction" and
"electric repulsion" cylce in phases. The effect is to keep the
protons from coming in contact and from flying apart providing a stable
balance between the effects.

Phil

"Phil" wrote in message
ps.com...

G. L. Bradford wrote:
With or of neutrality, repulsion? Dual nature?

GLB

G.L.,

I have modeled "strong force" in a way where "inertial attraction" and
"electric repulsion" cylce in phases. The effect is to keep the
protons from coming in contact and from flying apart providing a stable
balance between the effects.

Phil

The strong force, or electro-strong force, or electro-strong-weak force,
whichever, wasn't quite the one I was leaning toward. But . . . .

GLB

"G. L. Bradford" wrote in message
...

"Phil" wrote in message
ps.com...

G. L. Bradford wrote:
With or of neutrality, repulsion? Dual nature?

GLB

G.L.,

I have modeled "strong force" in a way where "inertial attraction" and
"electric repulsion" cylce in phases. The effect is to keep the
protons from coming in contact and from flying apart providing a stable
balance between the effects.

Phil

The strong force, or electro-strong force, or electro-strong-weak force,
whichever, wasn't quite the one I was leaning toward. But . . . .

I figured as much. Even so, there is much more going on than the simplistic
model I worked with. But it occurred to me afterwards that fields in flux
in phase relationships offer potential for modeling such effects.

Phil