Sorcerer wrote:
"Dirk Van de moortel" wrote
in message ...
|
| "Sorcerer" wrote in message
.uk...
|
| "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote
| in message ...
| |
| | "Rudolf Drabek" wrote in message
| ups.com...
| |
| | Tom Roberts schrieb:
| |
| | Rudolf Drabek wrote:
| | c with the value of +-300000 km/s is the physically infinite
value
| for
| | speed.
| |
| | The very bad PUN you use on the word "infinite" is neither helpful
nor
| | useful. Use words with their normal meanings or you risk serious
| | misunderstandings (as evidenced around here daily).
| |
| | I said and mean "physically infinite".
| | What I want to express is, that adding a velocity to the "physically
| | infinite value of c" the sum remains the same, as in math .
| |
| | But velocities are not added at all.
|
| HAHAHAHA!
| "But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when measured
in
| the stationary system, with the velocity c-v"
|
| [Not for Androcles]
|
| This is about closing velocity, aka relative velocities
| between two objects:

HAHAHAHA!
c-v is an opening velocity, ****head, and there is only one
velocity between two objects, you ****in' moron.

Why, no, no there's not only one velocity between two objects. That
would be the point.

PD

ROFLMAO!

Androcles

Sorcerer schrieb:

"Dirk Van de moortel" wrote
in message ...
|
| "Rudolf Drabek" wrote in message
ups.com...
|
| Tom Roberts schrieb:
|
| Rudolf Drabek wrote:
| c with the value of +-300000 km/s is the physically infinite value
for
| speed.
|
| The very bad PUN you use on the word "infinite" is neither helpful nor
| useful. Use words with their normal meanings or you risk serious
| misunderstandings (as evidenced around here daily).
|
| I said and mean "physically infinite".
| What I want to express is, that adding a velocity to the "physically
| infinite value of c" the sum remains the same, as in math .
|
| But velocities are not added at all.
Correct, but in general, not mentioned, all vectors are in x
direction. And if u is equal with c then c +-v = c. In case one
vector is c the other one can have all directions, still the |vector|
sum is c.


HAHAHAHA!
"But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when measured in
the stationary system, with the velocity c-v" - The Lord Einstein.
You spoke blasphemy, Dork. Say three Hail Aethers.

Hail Aether,
Full of Light,
Einstein is with thee.
Blessed art thou among absolute frames of reference,
and blessed is the fruit of thy tomb, Lorentz Transform.
Holy Aether,
Daughter of Lunacy,
prey on us morons now,
and at the dilated hour of death.

"Brian Kennelly" wrote in message
newsJOXg.4049$gM1.2431@fed1read12...
| Sorcerer wrote:
| "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote
| in message ...
| |
| | "Sorcerer" wrote in message
| .uk...
| |
| | "Dirk Van de moortel"
| wrote
| | in message ...
| | |
| | | "Rudolf Drabek" wrote in message
| | ups.com...
| | |
| | | Tom Roberts schrieb:
| | |
| | | Rudolf Drabek wrote:
| | | c with the value of +-300000 km/s is the physically infinite
| value
| | for
| | | speed.
| | |
| | | The very bad PUN you use on the word "infinite" is neither
helpful
| nor
| | | useful. Use words with their normal meanings or you risk
serious
| | | misunderstandings (as evidenced around here daily).
| | |
| | | I said and mean "physically infinite".
| | | What I want to express is, that adding a velocity to the
"physically
| | | infinite value of c" the sum remains the same, as in math .
| | |
| | | But velocities are not added at all.
| |
| | HAHAHAHA!
| | "But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when
measured
| in
| | the stationary system, with the velocity c-v"
| |
| | [Not for Androcles]
| |
| | This is about closing velocity, aka relative velocities
| | between two objects:
|
| HAHAHAHA!
| c-v is an opening velocity, ****head, and there is only one
| velocity between two objects, you ****in' moron.
|
| Right there is your fundamental break with SR.


Well done. Right there is where SR is broken, you ****in' ranting ****head.
The speed is suppose to be c in all frames of reference, but you
are so dumb you can't chew gum and scratch your arse at the same time,
let alone recognise a contradiction when its under your stupid nose.
delete rant

Androcles

Sorcerer wrote:
"Brian Kennelly" wrote in message
newsJOXg.4049$gM1.2431@fed1read12...
| Sorcerer wrote:
| "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote
| in message ...
| |
| | "Sorcerer" wrote in message
| .uk...
| |
| | "Dirk Van de moortel"
| wrote
| | in message ...
| | |
| | | "Rudolf Drabek" wrote in message
| | ups.com...
| | |
| | | Tom Roberts schrieb:
| | |
| | | Rudolf Drabek wrote:
| | | c with the value of +-300000 km/s is the physically infinite
| value
| | for
| | | speed.
| | |
| | | The very bad PUN you use on the word "infinite" is neither
helpful
| nor
| | | useful. Use words with their normal meanings or you risk
serious
| | | misunderstandings (as evidenced around here daily).
| | |
| | | I said and mean "physically infinite".
| | | What I want to express is, that adding a velocity to the
"physically
| | | infinite value of c" the sum remains the same, as in math .
| | |
| | | But velocities are not added at all.
| |
| | HAHAHAHA!
| | "But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when
measured
| in
| | the stationary system, with the velocity c-v"
| |
| | [Not for Androcles]
| |
| | This is about closing velocity, aka relative velocities
| | between two objects:
|
| HAHAHAHA!
| c-v is an opening velocity, ****head, and there is only one
| velocity between two objects, you ****in' moron.
|
| Right there is your fundamental break with SR.


Well done. Right there is where SR is broken,
The speed is suppose to be c in all frames of reference, but you
are so dumb you can't chew gum and scratch your arse at the same time,
let alone recognise a contradiction when its under your stupid nose.
delete rant
The only contradiction is the one you introduced by assuming
that relative velocity is invariant. If you assume that, you
are not discussing SR.


Androcles