![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: admini, alexander, cheating, inpain, introduced, lies, scientist, sheer |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. He was disusing about my work Einstein Sep 1905 paper and my book
100 Years Of E=mc2. https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 An open letter to Dr Alexander Inpain as he introduced on Wrap Forum. What you got in Cheating and Misusing Name of CERN ? www.cern.ch Part I In previous many posts on Special Relativity Forum you introduced yourself as Dr Alexander Inpain who working at CERN and running Nuclear Reactors. Also your reply showed that you are an administrators and post my replies on the Notice Boards of the CERN. So I gave lot of weightage to yours comments, which were absolutely unscientific. So , I could not assess how a person with SUCH POOR KNOWLEDGE can be at CERN? It became clear when I inquired from CERN regarding it. So you CHEATED scientific community on the WHOLE. It is matter of shame. ON 28 Sep I got letter from Head Physics Dept., Dr Jean-Jacques Blaising ( pasted below). Subject: Is Dr Inpain at CERN Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:27:30 +0200 From: "Jean-Jacques Blaising" Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert To: "ajay sharma" CC: "Jean-Jacques Blaising" Dear Mrs Sharma, Mr Inpain is not a member of the the CERN personnel and is not registered at CERN as a scientific associate. Regards, Jean-Jacques Blaising That you are not associated with CERN with any capacity. So you are a liar WHO WILL BELIEVE YOU. You have cheated the scientific community. Part II You don’t deserve the reply , but let me add. However I am posting this reply on various Internet Groups for information. You have posted some links Un moderated Internet Groups has NO scientific validity. Even a child knows this; it is merely a forums for interactions. My work is published in international journals after PEER REVIEW. I will welcome ANYONE to contradict it in the PHYSICS ESSAYS (as it originally published in it) www.physicsessays.com See how links given by you are scientifically MEANINGLESS.. http://groups.google.com/group/epist...7b3f49b8974b7a It has nothing to do with my work. http://gase1234.tripod.com/ASharma.pdf This link is without Name and Place. 100s times I asked ( see numerous posts , sci.physics.relativity) on google group that put your name and address in it. But it was not put. How can you believe a person who cannot put his name and address on the post? Apparently he is also like your elder brother. So EVERYTHING IS CLEAR. Only persons like you can give importance to this Even then if you put angle phi 89 then it SUPPORS my work . The end result is the same. It is incomplete in the sense that final numerical values are not calculated. Further http://www.sulekha.com/blogs/blogdis...or=macactupapi This link shows the lack of UNDERSTADING of 11th Class Physics i.e. application of Conservation of Momentum. What I can do? I can advise to read 11th class book. Earlier it was big NOTE by some UNKNOWN but now cut to Half. However this author has promised me long back that author will contradict me in PHYSICS ESSAYS. But the promise is not kept. Part III MY WORK IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT, FLAWLESS. Author/Editors/Publishers/Referees is all correct Still there ANYONE is welcome to contradict the work in Physics Essays giving the facts e.g. What is Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper ? What are conditions under which it is derived? Under what conditions experimentally it holds good? How to generalize it under all conditions? What is Ajay Sharma’s Interpretation? How Ajay Sharma’s apper is different from Einstein’s Sep 1905 paper How Ajay Sharma’s interpretation is incorrect (if it)? What are the correct interpretations? I HAVE ANSWERS TO ALL QUESTIONS. If Editor Physics Essays and his Editorial Board finds your interpretation and published the paper it is OK. There are thousands of link to my work on the internet. All the references are given below for the purpose. Part IV References. References of Einstein’s work . A.Einstein, Annalen der Physik 18 (1905) 639-641. . DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT? Weblink is Einstein’s 27 Sep 1905 paper available at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/ PartII References of Ajay Sharma’s work My work is available at A. Sharma, Physics Essays, 17 (2004) 195-222. ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 International Conferences It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the world --------------------------------------few of them 1. Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry , 20-25 August , 2006 Fort Worth Texas, USA 2. A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems ( Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53. 3. A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 , 10-14 April 2005 ( Organizer Institute of Physics , Bristol ) University of Warwick , ENGLAND 4. A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conference , OXFORD ENGLAND 5. A. Sharma,. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA , (2003) 585. 6. A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81 plus more -------------------------------------- Journals This paper ”The Origin of Generalized Mass-Energy Equation E = Ac2 M; and its applications in General physics and Cosmology”. is published in journal Physics Essays , CANADA www.physicsessays.com The paper The past ,present and future of E=mc2 will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts, USA. In parts it is published in various others journals. ---------------------- Book 100 Years of E=mc2 For details https://www.novapublishers.com/catal...oducts_id=4554 Ajay Sharma Email 1st October 2006 |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"ajay2244" wrote in message ... Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. Dr. Alexander Inpain is a distant cousin of Dr. Ian P. Freely of the University of S****horpe. Dirk Vdm |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dirk Van de moortel wrote: "ajay2244" wrote in message ... Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. Dr. Alexander Inpain is a distant cousin of Dr. Ian P. Freely of the University of S****horpe. Dirk Vdm ------------AJAY SHARMA thanks Dirk Vdm---------- But what was the necessity of telling lies and writing UNSCIENTIFIC comments ? THE LANGUAGE WAS TOO BELOW LEVEL OF GENTLEMAN. He showed No understanding of the topic. It is not in the interest of science. Really I took his comments very seriously, as these wer of CERN. Otherwise after few posts I would have left asking him to prove himself in the journal Physics Essays (where my paper is published ). Kindly do give me information where he is presently, my Email AJAY SHARMA |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"AJAY SHARMA" wrote in message oups.com... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: "ajay2244" wrote in message ... Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. Dr. Alexander Inpain is a distant cousin of Dr. Ian P. Freely of the University of S****horpe. Dirk Vdm ------------AJAY SHARMA thanks Dirk Vdm---------- But what was the necessity of telling lies and writing UNSCIENTIFIC comments ? THE LANGUAGE WAS TOO BELOW LEVEL OF GENTLEMAN. He showed No understanding of the topic. It is not in the interest of science. Really I took his comments very seriously, as these wer of CERN. Otherwise after few posts I would have left asking him to prove himself in the journal Physics Essays (where my paper is published ). Kindly do give me information where he is presently, my Email Write to S****horpe University and ask Dr. Freely. I'm sure he knows. Good luck. Dirk Vdm |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dirk Van de moortel wrote: "AJAY SHARMA" wrote in message oups.com... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: "ajay2244" wrote in message ... Sheer lies, cheating by Dr Alexander Inpain , who introduced as Scientist and Administrator at CERN ( European Organization for Nuclear Research ) in various post . But it proved all fraud. Dr. Alexander Inpain is a distant cousin of Dr. Ian P. Freely of the University of S****horpe. Dirk Vdm ------------AJAY SHARMA thanks Dirk Vdm---------- But what was the necessity of telling lies and writing UNSCIENTIFIC comments ? THE LANGUAGE WAS TOO BELOW LEVEL OF GENTLEMAN. He showed No understanding of the topic. It is not in the interest of science. Really I took his comments very seriously, as these wer of CERN. Otherwise after few posts I would have left asking him to prove himself in the journal Physics Essays (where my paper is published ). Kindly do give me information where he is presently, my Email Write to S****horpe University and ask Dr. Freely. I'm sure he knows. Good luck. Dirk Vdm Thanks I will do and let you know . Ajay Sharma |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|