Quantum entanglement test:

Take some tap water and put in a small pyrex beaker and stir.

Put two samples one in each of two test tubes.

Get two coils of wire and put the tubes of water one in each.

pass a pulse of current through one and with a cro detect the pulse in the
other.

If quantum enanglement takes place the second coil will give out a pulse to
the scope at the same time as the pulse in the exciter.

separation should not alter the pulse height of the recieved signal.

This is the basis of a quantum entanglement communication link.

--
Golden Helmet

Golden Helmet wrote:
Quantum entanglement test:

Take some tap water and put in a small pyrex beaker and stir.

Put two samples one in each of two test tubes.

Get two coils of wire and put the tubes of water one in each.

pass a pulse of current through one and with a cro detect the pulse in the
other.

If quantum enanglement takes place the second coil will give out a pulse to
the scope at the same time as the pulse in the exciter.

separation should not alter the pulse height of the recieved signal.

This is the basis of a quantum entanglement communication link.


Take a look at

Entanglement: The Greatest Mystery in Physics
Amir D Aczel
2002 John Wiley & Sons/Four Walls Eight
Windows 302pp 16.99/$28.00

There are two kinds of books about quantum
mechanics. There are those in which we learn
about abstract concepts such as Hilbert spaces,
state vectors and density matrixes, but where the
author never addresses - or only pays lip-service
to - the question of what quantum mechanics
actually means. This is the approach often taken in
textbooks. The other, quite opposite, approach
focuses on the interpretative question - drawing all
kinds of conclusions and analogies, talking about
telepathy and other mysteries, and perhaps even
claiming that quantum mechanics transcends
Western philosophy.

Neither approach is very helpful when one wants
to understand what quantum mechanics really
means in a deep philosophical sense. Amir Aczel's
new book on entanglement - falling as it does into
neither category - avoids such pitfalls.

Anton Zeilinger from the Institute of Experimental
Physics at the University of Vienna reviews the
book in the May issue of Physics World

I'll try it tomorrow.

I might need a pulse genersator and two demounted transformers.

Chris.

The electrons in the water get tangled as they are fermions and are in
coupled pairs, the coupling stays when a sample of the water it put into to
tubes.

KISS.


"Sam Wormley" wrote in message
news:VhoGg.146182$1i1.80044@attbi_s72...
Golden Helmet wrote:
Quantum entanglement test:

Take some tap water and put in a small pyrex beaker and stir.

Put two samples one in each of two test tubes.

Get two coils of wire and put the tubes of water one in each.

pass a pulse of current through one and with a cro detect the pulse in
the other.

If quantum enanglement takes place the second coil will give out a pulse
to the scope at the same time as the pulse in the exciter.

separation should not alter the pulse height of the recieved signal.

This is the basis of a quantum entanglement communication link.


Take a look at

Entanglement: The Greatest Mystery in Physics
Amir D Aczel
2002 John Wiley & Sons/Four Walls Eight
Windows 302pp 16.99/$28.00

There are two kinds of books about quantum
mechanics. There are those in which we learn
about abstract concepts such as Hilbert spaces,
state vectors and density matrixes, but where the
author never addresses - or only pays lip-service
to - the question of what quantum mechanics
actually means. This is the approach often taken in
textbooks. The other, quite opposite, approach
focuses on the interpretative question - drawing all
kinds of conclusions and analogies, talking about
telepathy and other mysteries, and perhaps even
claiming that quantum mechanics transcends
Western philosophy.

Neither approach is very helpful when one wants
to understand what quantum mechanics really
means in a deep philosophical sense. Amir Aczel's
new book on entanglement - falling as it does into
neither category - avoids such pitfalls.

Anton Zeilinger from the Institute of Experimental
Physics at the University of Vienna reviews the
book in the May issue of Physics World

"Sam Wormley" wrote in message
news:VhoGg.146182$1i1.80044@attbi_s72...
Golden Helmet wrote:
Quantum entanglement test:

Take some tap water and put in a small pyrex beaker and stir.

Put two samples one in each of two test tubes.

Get two coils of wire and put the tubes of water one in each.

pass a pulse of current through one and with a cro detect the pulse in
the other.

If quantum enanglement takes place the second coil will give out a pulse
to the scope at the same time as the pulse in the exciter.

separation should not alter the pulse height of the recieved signal.

This is the basis of a quantum entanglement communication link.


Take a look at

Entanglement: The Greatest Mystery in Physics
Amir D Aczel
2002 John Wiley & Sons/Four Walls Eight
Windows 302pp 16.99/$28.00

There are two kinds of books about quantum
mechanics. There are those in which we learn
about abstract concepts such as Hilbert spaces,
state vectors and density matrixes, but where the
author never addresses - or only pays lip-service
to - the question of what quantum mechanics
actually means. This is the approach often taken in
textbooks. The other, quite opposite, approach
focuses on the interpretative question - drawing all
kinds of conclusions and analogies, talking about
telepathy and other mysteries, and perhaps even
claiming that quantum mechanics transcends
Western philosophy.

I would say Von Neumann - Mathematical Foundations of QM does the math and
its meaning.

Thanks
Bill


Neither approach is very helpful when one wants
to understand what quantum mechanics really
means in a deep philosophical sense. Amir Aczel's
new book on entanglement - falling as it does into
neither category - avoids such pitfalls.

Anton Zeilinger from the Institute of Experimental
Physics at the University of Vienna reviews the
book in the May issue of Physics World

Why look at maths when I suggest anexperiment, the maths don't mean anything
without an experiment.

By the way have you seen any flowers the only bloom in the desert if no one
ses them?

And there are exactly 500 angels dancing on the head of my imaginary pin I
hold in my imaginary hand.

When you look they run away, look - there they go....

Through the ceiling.


"Bill Hobba" wrote in message
...

"Sam Wormley" wrote in message
news:VhoGg.146182$1i1.80044@attbi_s72...
Golden Helmet wrote:
Quantum entanglement test:

Take some tap water and put in a small pyrex beaker and stir.

Put two samples one in each of two test tubes.

Get two coils of wire and put the tubes of water one in each.

pass a pulse of current through one and with a cro detect the pulse in
the other.

If quantum enanglement takes place the second coil will give out a pulse
to the scope at the same time as the pulse in the exciter.

separation should not alter the pulse height of the recieved signal.

This is the basis of a quantum entanglement communication link.


Take a look at

Entanglement: The Greatest Mystery in Physics
Amir D Aczel
2002 John Wiley & Sons/Four Walls Eight
Windows 302pp 16.99/$28.00

There are two kinds of books about quantum
mechanics. There are those in which we learn
about abstract concepts such as Hilbert spaces,
state vectors and density matrixes, but where the
author never addresses - or only pays lip-service
to - the question of what quantum mechanics
actually means. This is the approach often taken in
textbooks. The other, quite opposite, approach
focuses on the interpretative question - drawing all
kinds of conclusions and analogies, talking about
telepathy and other mysteries, and perhaps even
claiming that quantum mechanics transcends
Western philosophy.

I would say Von Neumann - Mathematical Foundations of QM does the math and
its meaning.

Thanks
Bill


Neither approach is very helpful when one wants
to understand what quantum mechanics really
means in a deep philosophical sense. Amir Aczel's
new book on entanglement - falling as it does into
neither category - avoids such pitfalls.

Anton Zeilinger from the Institute of Experimental
Physics at the University of Vienna reviews the
book in the May issue of Physics World