"The Einstein Hoax"

The Einstein Hoax was written to counter an intellectual "fast shuffle"
which used Dr. Einstein's Special Relativity (which is easily seen to be a
mathematical copy of the earlier Lorentz Transformations Aether Theory) to
propagate the idea that our physical reality was too subtle to be understood
by mortal men and could only be dealt with using sophisticated mathematics.
This ploy served the academic community very well. The quote was made that
Dr. Einstein's principle contribution was not Special Relativity but rather
the showing that mathematics could used to make advances in the physical
sciences and "it was no longer necessary to wait for "the few great minds
that arise in each century" to make progress. Since the availability of such
intelligent men could not be expanded but mathematics can be taught to
anyone, the approach not only made the physical sciences more mysterious,
but allowed an unlimited expansion of the contributing scientific community.

The phenomena associated with both Special and General Relativity seem,
to a large degree, to be incomprehensible and the conclusions contradictory.
There is a simple reason for this. The explanations which are provided lead
the mind to recognize inherent contradictions which are not apparent in the
mathematics. Since the contradictions do not appear in the mathematics it
was considered obvious that did not exist! These contradictions have led to
the continuous confusion appearing in the Newsgroups and elsewhere. The
reality is that, when an expert(s) cannot explain his(their) knowledge to an
intelligent layman (laymen), there can only be one explanation. The
expert(s) do not actually understand their subject matter. IT IS NOT BECAUSE
OF THE LIMITATIONJS OF THE LAYMEN.

"The Einstein Hoax", http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm, was written to
provide an understanding of our physical reality which is in agreement with
all known physical observations and mathematical logic and , most
importantly, pass the "intelligent layman" test. The chapters of "The
Einstein Hoax" are listed below:

Chapter Titles

1. - Introduction
2. - Historical Background
3. - The Nature of the Einstein Hoax
4. - Does the Aether Exist?
5. - The Resurrection of Absolute Velocity by Quantum Experiments
6. - The Nature of Reality
7. - Applying the Lorentz Transformations Properly
8. - Generating the Gravity Transformations
9. - Dr. Einstein's Error and the Introduction of Curved Space
10. - Gravitational Contraction and Collapse
11. - Gravitational Collapse and the Creation of a Universe
12. - The Space Time Continuum
13. - The Nature of Particles
14. - Adding Quantum Effects to Our Understanding
15. - Changing the Paradigms
16. - What Can We Conclude?

There are 57,000 words and 53 illustrations.


The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.

All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

E-mail:- . If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.

The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.

--
Danny Dot
www.mobbinggonemad.org


"Gua" wrote in message
.. .
"The Einstein Hoax"

The Einstein Hoax was written to counter an intellectual "fast
shuffle" which used Dr. Einstein's Special Relativity (which is easily
seen to be a mathematical copy of the earlier Lorentz Transformations
Aether Theory)

Don't forget the derivation of e=m^2 from Maxwell's equations and the
derivation of the Lorentz tranformation from Maxwell's equation. The key
the Einstien's guinuis was he derived it all from Maxwell's equations.

Danny Dot
www.mobbinggonemad.org



to
propagate the idea that our physical reality was too subtle to be
understood by mortal men and could only be dealt with using sophisticated
mathematics. This ploy served the academic community very well. The quote
was made that Dr. Einstein's principle contribution was not Special
Relativity but rather the showing that mathematics could used to make
advances in the physical sciences and "it was no longer necessary to wait
for "the few great minds that arise in each century" to make progress.
Since the availability of such intelligent men could not be expanded but
mathematics can be taught to anyone, the approach not only made the
physical sciences more mysterious, but allowed an unlimited expansion of
the contributing scientific community.

The phenomena associated with both Special and General Relativity
seem, to a large degree, to be incomprehensible and the conclusions
contradictory. There is a simple reason for this. The explanations which
are provided lead the mind to recognize inherent contradictions which are
not apparent in the mathematics. Since the contradictions do not appear in
the mathematics it was considered obvious that did not exist! These
contradictions have led to the continuous confusion appearing in the
Newsgroups and elsewhere. The reality is that, when an expert(s) cannot
explain his(their) knowledge to an intelligent layman (laymen), there can
only be one explanation. The expert(s) do not actually understand their
subject matter. IT IS NOT BECAUSE OF THE LIMITATIONJS OF THE LAYMEN.

"The Einstein Hoax", http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm, was written to
provide an understanding of our physical reality which is in agreement
with all known physical observations and mathematical logic and , most
importantly, pass the "intelligent layman" test. The chapters of "The
Einstein Hoax" are listed below:

Chapter Titles

1. - Introduction
2. - Historical Background
3. - The Nature of the Einstein Hoax
4. - Does the Aether Exist?
5. - The Resurrection of Absolute Velocity by Quantum Experiments
6. - The Nature of Reality
7. - Applying the Lorentz Transformations Properly
8. - Generating the Gravity Transformations
9. - Dr. Einstein's Error and the Introduction of Curved Space
10. - Gravitational Contraction and Collapse
11. - Gravitational Collapse and the Creation of a Universe
12. - The Space Time Continuum
13. - The Nature of Particles
14. - Adding Quantum Effects to Our Understanding
15. - Changing the Paradigms
16. - What Can We Conclude?

There are 57,000 words and 53 illustrations.


The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997);
http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm (1987); and
http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE ACCEPT AS
TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS TRUE, IT
MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE MATHEMATICALLY
VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD
IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM THOSE IT HAS GRANTED
WORLD CLASS STATUS.

All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.

Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same
courtesy as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of
our parts, please do not raise objections that are not related to material
that you have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.

E-mail:- . If you wish a reply, be sure that your
mail reception is not blocked.

The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.

"Danny Dot" wrote in message
...

| Don't forget the derivation of e=m^2 from Maxwell's equations and the
| derivation of the Lorentz tranformation from Maxwell's equation. The key
| the Einstien's guinuis was he derived it all from Maxwell's equations.
|
| Danny Dot
| www.mobbinggonemad.org
|

The key the Einstein's Guinness is an Irish brewery.
Androcles

On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:06:49 +0000, "Danny Dot"
wrote in :

"Gua" wrote in message
.. .
"The Einstein Hoax"

The Einstein Hoax was written to counter an intellectual "fast
shuffle" which used Dr. Einstein's Special Relativity (which is easily
seen to be a mathematical copy of the earlier Lorentz Transformations
Aether Theory)

Don't forget the derivation of e=m^2 from Maxwell's equations and the

Huh? The units are wrong: charge is not the same as mass squared.

derivation of the Lorentz tranformation from Maxwell's equation. The
key the Einstien's guinuis was he derived it all from Maxwell's
equations.

I doubt it. First of all, the equation can't be right since
the units don't check. Secondly, Maxwell's equations are
derivable from Special Relativity, not the other way around.

[...]

--
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens, and they are us!

--
Danny Dot
www.mobbinggonemad.org


"The TimeLord" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:06:49 +0000, "Danny Dot"
wrote in :

"Gua" wrote in message
.. .
"The Einstein Hoax"

The Einstein Hoax was written to counter an intellectual "fast
shuffle" which used Dr. Einstein's Special Relativity (which is easily
seen to be a mathematical copy of the earlier Lorentz Transformations
Aether Theory)

Don't forget the derivation of e=m^2 from Maxwell's equations and the

Huh? The units are wrong: charge is not the same as mass squared.

derivation of the Lorentz tranformation from Maxwell's equation. The
key the Einstien's guinuis was he derived it all from Maxwell's
equations.

I doubt it. First of all, the equation can't be right since
the units don't check. Secondly, Maxwell's equations are
derivable from Special Relativity, not the other way around.


Maybe I have it backwards. Maybe it was that Einstien showed a derivation
of Maxwell's equations from SR. But I am very sure he somehow tied SR and
Maxwell's equations together in a simple way in his paper on SR in 1905. I
have seen the derivation in the past and the math was not that difficult to
follow.

Danny Dot
www.mobbinbgonemad.org



[...]

--
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens, and they are us!

Danny Dot wrote:
"The TimeLord" wrote:
Maxwell's equations are
derivable from Special Relativity, not the other way around.

Maybe I have it backwards. Maybe it was that Einstien showed a derivation
of Maxwell's equations from SR. But I am very sure he somehow tied SR and
Maxwell's equations together in a simple way in his paper on SR in 1905.

Neither direction is possible without additional assumptions. To derive
SR from Maxwell's equations one must assume the Principle of Relativity.
To derive Maxwell's equations from SR one must assume Coulomb's law.

In his 1905 paper, Einstein used the PoR and the source-independence of
the speed of light to derive the equations of SR. That second postulate
is easily derivable from Maxwell's equations, but he did not do that, he
just stated it as a postulate. Einstein also showed that Maxwell's
equations are valid in all inertial coordinates, as long as the
coordinates in different frames are related by Lorentz transforms.


Tom Roberts