the establishment are postulating for decades
that ether cant exists, becus if it were existing,
than it will be extremly rigid, so no motion is
possible in it

this is absolutly false, thank you very much

sopraner wrote:
the establishment are postulating for decades
that ether cant exists, becus if it were existing,
than it will be extremly rigid, so no motion is
possible in it

this is absolutly false, thank you very much

Luminiferous Aether was required to be extremely rigid to support
transverse EM waves, which are the only kind of EM waves, so you're
dead wrong.

Igor wrote:
sopraner wrote:
the establishment are postulating for decades
that ether cant exists, becus if it were existing,
than it will be extremly rigid, so no motion is
possible in it

this is absolutly false, thank you very much


Dear Sir

thank you for this e-mail

Luminiferous Aether was required to be extremely rigid to support
transverse EM waves, which are the only kind of EM waves, so you're
dead wrong.

lets cut tha crap,

are you tellin us that our motion
wold be imposible becus tha extremly
rigid ether?

you kno, motion, like takin the bus, go workin,
takin tha bus back from workin... and so on

please say yes, then i eill demonstrate ta you
hoe litle you kno about my physics

Igor wrote:
sopraner wrote:
the establishment are postulating for decades
that ether cant exists, becus if it were existing,
than it will be extremly rigid, so no motion is
possible in it

this is absolutly false, thank you very much


Dear Sir

thank you for this e-mail

Luminiferous Aether was required to be extremely rigid to support
transverse EM waves, which are the only kind of EM waves, so you're
dead wrong.

lets cut tha crap,

are you tellin us that our motion
wold be imposible becus tha extremly
rigid ether?

you kno, motion, like takin the bus, go workin,
takin tha bus back from workin... and so on

please say yes, then i eill demonstrate ta you
hoe litle you kno about my physics

sopraner wrote:
Igor wrote:
sopraner wrote:
the establishment are postulating for decades
that ether cant exists, becus if it were existing,
than it will be extremly rigid, so no motion is
possible in it

this is absolutly false, thank you very much


Dear Sir

thank you for this e-mail

Luminiferous Aether was required to be extremely rigid to support
transverse EM waves, which are the only kind of EM waves, so you're
dead wrong.

lets cut tha crap,

are you tellin us that our motion
wold be imposible becus tha extremly
rigid ether?

you kno, motion, like takin the bus, go workin,
takin tha bus back from workin... and so on

please say yes, then i eill demonstrate ta you
hoe litle you kno about my physics

Yeah, let's really cut the crap. Try moving through a brick wall, or
any other rigid solid.

Igor wrote:
sopraner wrote:
Igor wrote:
sopraner wrote:
the establishment are postulating for decades
that ether cant exists, becus if it were existing,
than it will be extremly rigid, so no motion is
possible in it

this is absolutly false, thank you very much


Dear Sir

thank you for this e-mail

Luminiferous Aether was required to be extremely rigid to support
transverse EM waves, which are the only kind of EM waves, so you're
dead wrong.

lets cut tha crap,

are you tellin us that our motion
wold be imposible becus tha extremly
rigid ether?

you kno, motion, like takin the bus, go workin,
takin tha bus back from workin... and so on

please say yes, then i eill demonstrate ta you
hoe litle you kno about my physics

Dear SIr

thenk you again for this new e-mail


Yeah, let's really cut the crap. Try moving through a brick wall, or
any other rigid solid.

this is too easy

you only say and think this becus you
dont know physics, and how tha motion
works

let me make it simple for yo and tha
establishment

when yo take tha bus, is easy, becus
you press the air molecules in the
direction of your propagation

so air overpressure in front and underpressure
back, this is easy

noe, we do tha same under tha surface of
the earth, in soil

same procedure, soil overpressure in front,
than same amount of underpressure back,
but now is not easy, not becus tha soil, but
becus tha friction, highere friction and viscosity

so in order ta move, we need slim, we dont
have much slim, worms have much slim,
for them is easy

we only do slim when we fok, thats whay we
like fok, becus is easy, the motion when fok
is easy, so we do more fok

so no problem with rigidity, the problem
is with tha work lost ta friction

so the fussy atoms are that fussy, just in order
ta make motion for ouer bus and bodies possible,
thru tha extremly rigid ether

if atoms were not fussy, than no motion were
possible, thats whay a dead cat cannot move
so easy

therfore, an object composed by less fussy
atoms, exhibits more inertia than a body
composed by more fussy atoms

now, i did tha thinking, yo do tha math, for my
thinkin

sopraner wrote:
the establishment are postulating for decades
that ether cant exists, becus if it were existing,
than it will be extremly rigid, so no motion is
possible in it

this is absolutly false, thank you very much

Looks like another fake imbecile.

standard deviation wrote:
Igor wrote:
sopraner wrote:
Igor wrote:
sopraner wrote:
the establishment are postulating for decades
that ether cant exists, becus if it were existing,
than it will be extremly rigid, so no motion is
possible in it

this is absolutly false, thank you very much


Dear Sir

thank you for this e-mail

Luminiferous Aether was required to be extremely rigid to support
transverse EM waves, which are the only kind of EM waves, so you're
dead wrong.

lets cut tha crap,

are you tellin us that our motion
wold be imposible becus tha extremly
rigid ether?

you kno, motion, like takin the bus, go workin,
takin tha bus back from workin... and so on

please say yes, then i eill demonstrate ta you
hoe litle you kno about my physics

Dear SIr

thenk you again for this new e-mail


Yeah, let's really cut the crap. Try moving through a brick wall, or
any other rigid solid.

this is too easy

you only say and think this becus you
dont know physics, and how tha motion
works

let me make it simple for yo and tha
establishment

when yo take tha bus, is easy, becus
you press the air molecules in the
direction of your propagation

so air overpressure in front and underpressure
back, this is easy

noe, we do tha same under tha surface of
the earth, in soil

same procedure, soil overpressure in front,
than same amount of underpressure back,
but now is not easy, not becus tha soil, but
becus tha friction, highere friction and viscosity

so in order ta move, we need slim, we dont
have much slim, worms have much slim,
for them is easy

we only do slim when we fok, thats whay we
like fok, becus is easy, the motion when fok
is easy, so we do more fok

so no problem with rigidity, the problem
is with tha work lost ta friction

so the fussy atoms are that fussy, just in order
ta make motion for ouer bus and bodies possible,
thru tha extremly rigid ether

if atoms were not fussy, than no motion were
possible, thats whay a dead cat cannot move
so easy

therfore, an object composed by less fussy
atoms, exhibits more inertia than a body
composed by more fussy atoms

now, i did tha thinking, yo do tha math, for my
thinkin

Oh, I'm sorry. You must have already tried running through that brick
wall. Head first, yet.

Plonk and gone...

Paul Cardinale wrote:
sopraner wrote:
the establishment are postulating for decades
that ether cant exists, becus if it were existing,
than it will be extremly rigid, so no motion is
possible in it

this is absolutly false, thank you very much

Looks like another fake imbecile.

you're a big country

Igor wrote:
standard deviation wrote:
Igor wrote:
sopraner wrote:
Igor wrote:
sopraner wrote:
the establishment are postulating for decades
that ether cant exists, becus if it were existing,
than it will be extremly rigid, so no motion is
possible in it

this is absolutly false, thank you very much


Dear Sir

thank you for this e-mail

Luminiferous Aether was required to be extremely rigid to support
transverse EM waves, which are the only kind of EM waves, so you're
dead wrong.

lets cut tha crap,

are you tellin us that our motion
wold be imposible becus tha extremly
rigid ether?

you kno, motion, like takin the bus, go workin,
takin tha bus back from workin... and so on

please say yes, then i eill demonstrate ta you
hoe litle you kno about my physics

Dear SIr

thenk you again for this new e-mail


Yeah, let's really cut the crap. Try moving through a brick wall, or
any other rigid solid.

this is too easy

you only say and think this becus you
dont know physics, and how tha motion
works

let me make it simple for yo and tha
establishment

when yo take tha bus, is easy, becus
you press the air molecules in the
direction of your propagation

so air overpressure in front and underpressure
back, this is easy

noe, we do tha same under tha surface of
the earth, in soil

same procedure, soil overpressure in front,
than same amount of underpressure back,
but now is not easy, not becus tha soil, but
becus tha friction, highere friction and viscosity

so in order ta move, we need slim, we dont
have much slim, worms have much slim,
for them is easy

we only do slim when we fok, thats whay we
like fok, becus is easy, the motion when fok
is easy, so we do more fok

so no problem with rigidity, the problem
is with tha work lost ta friction

so the fussy atoms are that fussy, just in order
ta make motion for ouer bus and bodies possible,
thru tha extremly rigid ether

if atoms were not fussy, than no motion were
possible, thats whay a dead cat cannot move
so easy

therfore, an object composed by less fussy
atoms, exhibits more inertia than a body
composed by more fussy atoms

now, i did tha thinking, yo do tha math, for my
thinkin

Oh, I'm sorry. You must have already tried running through that brick
wall. Head first, yet.

Plonk and gone...

why not arguing using arguments?

you have none?