I think : T=0K.

"socratus" wrote in message
ps.com...
|I think : T=0K.
|

Prove it (that you think, I mean).

Androcles

0=product(i*sin(k*pi))
k=-infinity - to+ infinity
checkyourself, using euler formula and
1=product(cos(k*pi))
i=+infinity=-infinity
0^N = prod (i*sin(k*pi), k=-N to+ N
0^0=0^-infinity=0^+infinity=1
Sorcerer wrote:
"socratus" wrote in message
ps.com...
|I think : T=0K.
|

Prove it (that you think, I mean).

Androcles

(10 x 60 x 60 ) + ( 10 x 60 ) + 10 = 36.000 + 600 + 10 = 36.610 s

Along a consideration of 10 hours 10 minutes and 10 seconds on a seconds

--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Best Regards!

"socratus" wrote in message
ps.com...
I think : T=0K.

socratus wrote:
I think : T=0K.
This equation assumes a definition of temperature. This is defined by
the thermal motion of molecules. If T=0K, there remain immobile
molecules.
kunzmilan

For Sorcerer/ Androcles
==================
My proofe.
1.
Now it is considered that the Universe, as an absolute frame of
reference
is in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests of relic radiation of the Big
Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change
and decrease down to Т=0К.
2.
We cannot reach T=0K because it is Universe of
heat and radiation death ( E=0).
3.
Death for us is an end of everything,
enter in the Empire of NOTHING.
4.
Classic physics says :
In NOTHING, in T=0K ( Energy =0) the moving of particles stops.
Quantum physics.
a)
Quantum physics says:
In NOTHING the moving is possible but only for “virtual particles�.
b)
Quantum physics respects the Classic physics very much.
Quantum physics does not want to quarrel with Classic physics
therefore it says modestly:
In NOTHING the Energy is not zero, but approximately zero.
To say so is like as some gynecologist says:
“She is approximately a pregnant woman�.
5.
In the Empire of NOTHING:
T=0K.
Energy =0.
Time=0.
But “virtual particles� exist.
6.
Why do the particles of Classic physics stop its moving in T=0K?
Why don,t the particles of Quantum physics stop its moving in T=0K?
Maybe they are absolute different particles?

"socratus" wrote in message
oups.com...

For Sorcerer/ Androcles
==================
My proofe.
1.
Now it is considered that the Universe, as an absolute frame of
reference
is in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests of relic radiation of the Big
Bang ).

You can stop right there and prove this imaginary "Big Bang".
Androcles.

First of all, along a fastidious a property over which resides no membre of
the left is a greater than or an equal to any membre along the right.

x = { L | R }

Secondly, one number is less than or an equal to another number, if and only
if, no membre of the first number on the left is a greater than or an equal
to the second number.

However, and when, no member of the second number on the right is less than
or an equal to the first number.

Therefore, along that moment would be the number zero 0, created along a
choosing both sides, the right and the left sides to be an empty side, Ø ,
then would be :

0 = { Ø | Ø }

Therefore, in the meantime, no membre along the empty side on the left is an
equal to or a greater than any membre along the right empty side, for the
simple reason, that the empty side has members.

However, 0 is less than or an equal to 0, along a making the other a natural
numbers.

Therefore, in the meantime, Ø and 0 along which appear a possible
combination along only two manners, when it would be added an I and - I,
then would be :

I = { Ø | 0 } and - I = { 0 | Ø }

However, even a positive number, for instance, N would make a possibility to
attain N + I, along a combination of an empty side, then would be :

{ N | Ø } = N + I

Therefore, along the negative would be as follows :

-N -I = { Ø | - N }


--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Best Regards!


"socratus" wrote in message
oups.com...

For Sorcerer/ Androcles
==================
My proofe.
1.
Now it is considered that the Universe, as an absolute frame of
reference
is in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests of relic radiation of the Big
Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change
and decrease down to ?=0?.
2.
We cannot reach T=0K because it is Universe of
heat and radiation death ( E=0).
3.
Death for us is an end of everything,
enter in the Empire of NOTHING.
4.
Classic physics says :
In NOTHING, in T=0K ( Energy =0) the moving of particles stops.
Quantum physics.
a)
Quantum physics says:
In NOTHING the moving is possible but only for "virtual particles".
b)
Quantum physics respects the Classic physics very much.
Quantum physics does not want to quarrel with Classic physics
therefore it says modestly:
In NOTHING the Energy is not zero, but approximately zero.
To say so is like as some gynecologist says:
"She is approximately a pregnant woman".
5.
In the Empire of NOTHING:
T=0K.
Energy =0.
Time=0.
But "virtual particles" exist.
6.
Why do the particles of Classic physics stop its moving in T=0K?
Why don,t the particles of Quantum physics stop its moving in T=0K?
Maybe they are absolute different particles?

"socratus" kirjoitti
glegroups.com...

For Sorcerer/ Androcles
==================
My proofe.
1.
Now it is considered that the Universe, as an absolute frame of
reference
is in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests of relic radiation of the Big
Bang ).
But, the relic radiation is extended and in the future will change
and decrease down to ?=0?.
2.
We cannot reach T=0K because it is Universe of
heat and radiation death ( E=0).
3.
Death for us is an end of everything,
enter in the Empire of NOTHING.
4.
Classic physics says :
In NOTHING, in T=0K ( Energy =0) the moving of particles stops.
Quantum physics.
a)
Quantum physics says:
In NOTHING the moving is possible but only for "virtual particles".
b)
Quantum physics respects the Classic physics very much.
Quantum physics does not want to quarrel with Classic physics
therefore it says modestly:
In NOTHING the Energy is not zero, but approximately zero.
To say so is like as some gynecologist says:
"She is approximately a pregnant woman".
5.
In the Empire of NOTHING:
T=0K.
Energy =0.
Time=0.
But "virtual particles" exist.
6.
Why do the particles of Classic physics stop its moving in T=0K?
Why don,t the particles of Quantum physics stop its moving in T=0K?
Maybe they are absolute different particles?

That is math thinking. It is interesting, but I think that it is misleading.
Or did I misunderstood something. Moving of particles is not significant,
their existence is. If any particle exists, then T=OK is impossible.

Henry Haapalainen

For Henry Haapalainen .
===========
1.
There are two parallel World:
a) T=0K / Classic physics /
b) T no 0K /Quantum physics /
2.
In T=0K only "virtual particles" exist.
Only they can moving in T=0K.
Moving of "virtual particles" is significant very much.
Only from them begin our existence.
==================
But Quantum physics " hesitate " to give to Vacuum
physical property T=0K.