A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: ,

What is the formula of Nothing?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 14th 06 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Henry Haapalainen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 976
Default What is the formula of Nothing?


"socratus" kirjoitti
legroups.com...

For Henry Haapalainen .
===========
1.
There are two parallel World:
a) T=0K / Classic physics /
b) T no 0K /Quantum physics /
2.
In T=0K only "virtual particles" exist.
Only they can moving in T=0K.
Moving of "virtual particles" is significant very much.
Only from them begin our existence.
==================
But Quantum physics " hesitate " to give to Vacuum
physical property T=0K.


Thank you, it is possible that my english is too bad to understand it
exatly. To me a particle is not a point in space, it is the midmost part of
the fields surrounding it (gravity + EM). Without particles there is
nothing.

Henry Haapalainen


Ads
  #12  
Old August 21st 06 posted to sci.physics.relativity
socratus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 521
Default What is the formula of Nothing?


To Henry Haapalainen
=================
If you say your English is bad , it means
my explaining is wrong.
I will try to explain it again.
==================
You wrote :
Without particles there is nothing.
Ok.
Maybe everybody agree with you.
But you wrote :
To me a particle is not a point in space, it is the midmost part of
the fields surrounding it (gravity + EM).

I don't understand you.
It means that one particle has (gravity + EM) simultaneously together.
It is impossible.
Why?
==========
1.
For example take an electron.
An electron has a mass.
But there isn,t a theory about gravitational field of electron.
Why?
Because it is too small and isn,t necessity in it.
Everybody interested only in electrical forces of an electron.
So an electron is only electrical particle.
It is impossible that electron (gravity + EM) particle.
============================
2.
Quantum theory explain the space without
gravitational field ( electrical field ).
Classic theory explain the space with
gravitational field.
The laws of gravitational field is absolutely different from the laws
of electrical field.
It is necessary to understand their interaction.
===============

  #13  
Old August 21st 06 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Golden Helmet
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 75
Default What is the formula of Nothing?

O
"socratus" wrote in message
ups.com...

To Henry Haapalainen
=================
If you say your English is bad , it means
my explaining is wrong.
I will try to explain it again.
==================
You wrote :
Without particles there is nothing.
Ok.
Maybe everybody agree with you.
But you wrote :
To me a particle is not a point in space, it is the midmost part of
the fields surrounding it (gravity + EM).

I don't understand you.
It means that one particle has (gravity + EM) simultaneously together.
It is impossible.
Why?
==========
1.
For example take an electron.
An electron has a mass.
But there isn,t a theory about gravitational field of electron.
Why?
Because it is too small and isn,t necessity in it.
Everybody interested only in electrical forces of an electron.
So an electron is only electrical particle.
It is impossible that electron (gravity + EM) particle.
============================
2.
Quantum theory explain the space without
gravitational field ( electrical field ).
Classic theory explain the space with
gravitational field.
The laws of gravitational field is absolutely different from the laws
of electrical field.
It is necessary to understand their interaction.
===============



  #14  
Old August 23rd 06 posted to sci.physics.relativity
socratus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 521
Default What is the formula of Nothing?


I say : The Physics is first of all Vacuum: T=0K.
==========================================

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
formula for 1/1+1/2+1/3+1/4+1/5......+1/(L-1) borje@ludd.luth.se Physics - General Discussion 0 July 11th 06 10:00 PM
Formula #4: s=(vi)t + (a/2)t^2 Don1 Physics - General (alternative forum) 20 September 18th 05 08:36 PM
One formula for all of conduction, whether superconduction or normalconduction; Formula is a Coulomb-look-alike only with Temperature innumerator Archimedes Plutonium Physics - General Discussion 1 February 19th 05 08:50 AM
One formula for all of conduction, whether superconduction or normalconduction; Formula is a Coulomb-look-alike only with Temperature innumerator Archimedes Plutonium Electromagnetic Theory and Applications 1 February 19th 05 08:50 AM
I'd need a formula JJ Physics - General (alternative forum) 1 November 14th 03 12:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Unblock Myspace - Myspace Proxy - Remortgages - Best Credit Cards - Internet Advertising