Peaches , the scatological stewardess, bewailed:

The feathered, oxygen wasting pimple known as "Kadaitcha Man"
wrote in message
...
HW@..(Henri Wilson), the double-dealing gunsmith, urped:

Time is a scalar. It it always positive.

Why do you believe that time is always positive? Interacting
particles do not give a **** what direction time is running in so
what law of physics is violated if an interaction happens in
reverse, other than no law at all?

The time dilation factor of any massless particle is zero, so if we
can have positive time and zero time, and we can have twin particles
where each individual particle can experience different amounts of
time, ƒ = sqrt[1-(v/c)^2], why can't there be negative time? Hmmm?

If ƒ = sqrt[1-(v/c)^2] goes to zero when v = c, what happens if v is
greater than c? Hmmm? ƒ is the square root of a negative number, is
it not? Hmmm? Doesn't that make ƒ imaginary? Hmmm? What about E? Is E
also imaginary? Hmmm?

E = m0c^2/sqrt[(v/c)^2 –1]

That says the order of events can be reversed.

HTH & HAND

You did a lot of humming

Hmmm? Hummmmm!

You idiot.

in that post where you must've lifted most
of the content, but it keeps you occupied......................


--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005 and April 2006

ObHint: Just because you argue with a notorious ****wit netk0oK, it
does not necessarily follow that you are not also a ****wit netk0oK.



--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005 and April 2006

ObHint: Just because you argue with a notorious ****wit netk0oK, it
does not necessarily follow that you are not also a ****wit netk0oK.

On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:51:46 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:


"Jerry" wrote in message oups.com...
wrote:

I can get copies of the papers from my university library. Will
take a while to wrestle it through.

My brother

Tom, right?

Dirk Vdm

Gord!

Humour, Dinky style!


says that he owns Fox (1967). Assuming that he
can find it (not certain), I'll scan and post tonight.

Jerry




HW.
www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.

Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"Jerry" wrote in message oups.com...
wrote:

I can get copies of the papers from my university library. Will
take a while to wrestle it through.

My brother

Tom, right?

Yep, you're absolutely right, Tom and Jerry! :-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_and_Jerry_(MGM)
http://www.tomandjerryonline.com/
http://www.tomandjerrycartoons.com/

Except, of course, Jerry is only my handle, not my real name.

Jerry

"Jerry" wrote in message oups.com...
| Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
| "Jerry" wrote in message oups.com...
| wrote:
|
| I can get copies of the papers from my university library. Will
| take a while to wrestle it through.
|
| My brother
|
| Tom, right?
|
| Yep, you're absolutely right, Tom and Jerry! :-)
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_and_Jerry_(MGM)
| http://www.tomandjerryonline.com/
| http://www.tomandjerrycartoons.com/
|
| Except, of course, Jerry is only my handle, not my real name.
|
| Jerry

Oh dear... Now the Belgian arsehole will stalk you, pseudonyms are a crime
to Dork Van de merde. Expect a trojan in your computer, specifically targeted.



Androcles

"Jerry" wrote in message oups.com...
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"Jerry" wrote in message oups.com...
wrote:

I can get copies of the papers from my university library. Will
take a while to wrestle it through.

My brother

Tom, right?

Yep, you're absolutely right, Tom and Jerry! :-)

Yeep!
But we know that is not the reason why I asked, don't we?
Cheers and enjoy :-)

Dirk Vdm


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_and_Jerry_(MGM)
http://www.tomandjerryonline.com/
http://www.tomandjerrycartoons.com/

Except, of course, Jerry is only my handle, not my real name.

Jerry

wrote:
Jerry wrote:
wrote:

I looked over the 1977 Brecher article (Thanks!) and do see where
he dealt with extinction (to my satisfaction) in accordance with what
was thought to be known about it at the time. Still have to look over
the two J.G. Fox articles that I don't currently hold. Am. J. Phys.,
30, 297 (1962), and J. Opt. Soc. America, 57,967 (1967).

I can't help you on the J. Opt. Soc. America article, since the
local university library doesn't carry it.

Jerry

I can get copies of the papers from my university library. Will
take a while to wrestle it through.

My brother DID have the Fox (1967) article, which I scanned.
http://imaginary_nematode.home.comca...s/Fox_1967.pdf

On my web site, I've just uploaded another paper of interest that Fox
recommended as having properly controlled for extinction:
http://imaginary_nematode.home.comca...rgman_1964.pdf

I also have
http://imaginary_nematode.home.comca...ndics_1965.pdf
which Fox recommended as having meaningful data.

Jerry