![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: field |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#61
|
|||
|
|||
|
kenseto wrote: kenseto wrote: ROTFLOL.....this idiot said that space is not a material substance though it does have properties. It can push things around and it can expand faster than light and carries the galaxies along with it as it expands. PD: That's right. KS: Only an idiot would say that and at the time time claim that space is not a material substance. Really? And you, as a layman, are equipped to make that judgement? Do you expect us laymen to accept any bull **** that you spew out?? PD: That depends on the layman. In your case, I have no expectations whatsoever. You seem to equate "correct" with "obvious even to an idiot". That would be an incorrect equation. Something can be quite correct, even though it is not obvious to an idiot. KS: Your idiocy is based on the following: 1. You admitted that space is not nothingness but you refuse to call space a material medium. That's right. You seem to have difficulty with that concept. 1. you rejected the existence of an ether and you reject the notion that space can be called the ether. Ether is a material substance. There is no experimental evidence whatsoever that space is a material substance. 2. at the same time you endowed the empty space (non-existence of the ether) with lots of physical properties that are properties of the ether. And yet space is also absent the properties of a material ether; for example, a compressive modulus, mass density, or frequency-dependent dispersion. Space certainly has physical properties, but not those of a *material* medium that an ether would be required to have. Furthermore, none of the physical properties of space require a material medium for the presence of those properties. Your truly are a brainwashed idiot. Well, I'd put it a different way. I'd say I've been sufficiently educated to be able to distinguish the properties of space and the properties of a material medium. This is something you seem to have difficulty with. It's not too late to correct that, however. PD |
| Ads |
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
|
ROTFLOL....so calling ether by a different name is a refutation of the
ether. You are an idiot. |
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
|
"kenseto" wrote in message oups.com... ROTFLOL....so calling ether by a different name is a refutation of the ether. You are an idiot. Why is that those who have plenty of back up for their positions generally avoid such rudeness and blatant insults, and those who have no support for their positions resort to such tactics as a normal part of their debating style? (BTW, no answer to that question is required) |
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
|
kenseto wrote: ROTFLOL....so calling ether by a different name is a refutation of the ether. You are an idiot. No, it is not calling ether by a different name. Let me repeat my statement, more slowly. A n e t h e r i s a m a t e r i a l s u b s t a n c e w i t h m a t e r i a l p r o p e r t i e s t h a t s p a c e d o e s n o t s h a r e . T h e p r o p e r t i e s o f s p a c e d o n o t i m p l y a m a t e r i a l m e d i u m . PD |
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
|
Let me repeat what I said slowly....you don't know what material
substance mean. You assigned the term material substance to ether but you have no idea what is an ether. You said that space is not the ether but since you don't know what is space so how can you made such a stupid statement????? |
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
|
kenseto wrote: Steven Weinberg said that a field is stress in space. Doesn't that sound like that space is a material medium that can have stress? If so how is a field different than the ether? No since a field is not a stress. It's a stress-strain transformation as Einstein quite clearly showed. Since a stress is nothing but a volume conataining a volatile mixture of mass and energy as E=MC^2 also ahows. The ether is diiferent from a field since it's Maxwell's theory of light, not a field. |
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
|
kenseto wrote: Let me repeat what I said slowly....you don't know what material substance mean. You assigned the term material substance to ether but you have no idea what is an ether. You said that space is not the ether but since you don't know what is space so how can you made such a stupid statement????? On the contrary, I listed several properties of space, and I listed several properties of a material medium (like an ether). I understand the difference. You apparently do not. I'm not surprised. You have not taken the effort to learn the basics or read enough to be able to make the distinction. PD |
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
|
kenseto wrote: Let me repeat what I said slowly....you don't know what material substance mean. You assigned the term material substance to ether but you have no idea what is an ether. You said that space is not the ether but since you don't know what is space so how can you made such a stupid statement????? PD wrote: On the contrary, I listed several properties of space, and I listed several properties of a material medium (like an ether). I understand the difference. You apparently do not. I'm not surprised. You have not taken the effort to learn the basics or read enough to be able to make the distinction. KS: Hey idiot those properties of space that you listed are the properties of an ether. All the properties you listed for a material substance can be the properties of a material substance (such as the electron) interacting with the structure (the geometry) of the ether. |
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
|
kenseto wrote: kenseto wrote: Let me repeat what I said slowly....you don't know what material substance mean. You assigned the term material substance to ether but you have no idea what is an ether. You said that space is not the ether but since you don't know what is space so how can you made such a stupid statement????? PD wrote: On the contrary, I listed several properties of space, and I listed several properties of a material medium (like an ether). I understand the difference. You apparently do not. I'm not surprised. You have not taken the effort to learn the basics or read enough to be able to make the distinction. KS: Hey idiot those properties of space that you listed are the properties of an ether. Really? List the properties I gave you and explain how they are properties of an ether. All the properties you listed for a material substance can be the properties of a material substance Gotta love that statement... (such as the electron) interacting with the structure (the geometry) of the ether. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Magnetic field problem, (a proof of uniqueness of field potential) | Harry | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | November 30th 05 02:53 AM |
| Smart Model Prediction - Spiritual Life Particle Field Exists in Gravitational Field .... | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 11 | May 10th 04 08:18 PM |
| Smart Model Prediction - Spiritual Life Particle Field Exists in Gravitational Field .... | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 31 | May 10th 04 08:13 PM |
| Smart Model Prediction - Spiritual Life Particle Field Exists in Gravitational Field .... | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | April 29th 04 10:03 PM |
| Smart Model Prediction - Spiritual Life Particle Field Exists in Gravitational Field .... | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - New Theories | 0 | April 26th 04 02:20 PM |