If you compare Dr. Hansik Yoon's cosmology with the result of NASA's
Chandra X-ray Observatory about the formation of new stars from the
so-called black holes.

You will find how exactly Dr. Yoon's cosmology agrees with it, while
today's particle physics cannot explain it.

Based on "Natural Science Founded on A New Atomic Model" by Hansik
Yoon.
( http://www.yoonsatom.net and http://yoonsphysics.blogspot.com/ )

Lloyd Parker wrote:
In article ,
Happy Hippy wrote:

PD wrote:

Happy Hippy wrote:


PD wrote:


Happy Hippy wrote:



Lloyd Parker wrote:



In article ,
Happy Hippy wrote:




Sam Wormley wrote:




Happy Hippy wrote:





The only question is
'Whence the spin?'
The answer:
The Universe is spinning.


There is plenty of spinning going on *within* the universe, but the
universe as a whole....

Assuming the inflationary scenario is correct, one would expect any
universal rotation to be extremely small.

Some Papers involving "Rotation of the Universe"



http://www.google.com/search?q=%22ro...%22+site%3AarX

iv.org



Yes, there is lots of spinning in the Universe.
The Universe continues at larger and smaller scales infinitely.
But the scale we are concerned with
is the next up from Black Holes.

Consider the neutron star; collections of electrons
melded to protons fall back into the BH to be spun
back up into plasma, stuff of stars.

What is this Black Hole? It is itself a nucleus
composed of protons and neutrons. It is spin.


No. There are no protons and neutrons on a BH. It is a singularity.

Zero

volume, infinite density.


hahaha




Where did it get its spin?


From the spinning star that collapsed. Conservation of angular

momentum.

Which star was that?
Is there a *preferred* star that collapses and then
becomes the central BH of each galaxy?
After this preferred star collapses then no
more stars collapse to form BHs...ever? Why?


I don't know why you would think that. Just because a galaxy has a Big
Old Black Hole in the core does not mean that there are no other black
holes in the galaxy.


Why wouldn't there be?

So why are they only seeing one at
the center of spiral galaxies?


The one at the center of a galaxy did not come from the collapse of one
star necessarily. These typically have a mass of thousands to millions
of suns, which means that several black holes near each other coalesced
or that the black hole consumed a large number of stars (some of which
would have collapsed into a black hole and some of which would not
have) or both.



Stars are collapsing ALL the time.
Where are all these black holes?


In the arms of the spiral galaxy there are some that haven't been
sucked into the big one in the middle.



On the other hand, if spiral galaxies
are atoms and ellipticals are molecules
the former will have one at the center
and the latter more than one.


You'll note that the protons in atoms and the atoms in molecules do not
coalesce the way that black holes do. There goes that model!

You got it backwards again, PD.
Hint: we *see* that "the protons in atoms and the atoms in molecules do
not coalesce". OK so far.
Now.
"(T)he way that black holes do."
Hmm. Are you saying we have seen this?
Because if we have, then you're right.

You see, I'm saying that BHs do what atomic nuclei
do.

No such thing as a singularity, Dude.
(Or DM.
Or DE.)

Nuclei have dimensionality; they are not a singularity.



John
Galaxy Model for the Atom
http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/

Happy Hippy wrote:

No such thing as a singularity, Dude.
(Or DM.
Or DE.)


Singularity Theorem
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...tyTheorem.html

Sam Wormley wrote:
Happy Hippy wrote:

No such thing as a singularity, Dude.
(Or DM.
Or DE.)


Singularity Theorem
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...tyTheorem.html

Singularity
Flat Earth
Hollow Earth
Universe in the volume of an atom
Idiots abound.

Happy Hippy wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:

Happy Hippy wrote:

No such thing as a singularity, Dude.
(Or DM.
Or DE.)


Singularity Theorem
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...tyTheorem.html


Singularity
Flat Earth
Hollow Earth
Universe in the volume of an atom
Idiots abound.

Welcome to the wold of idiots, or should I say, untutored fools, John!

Happy Hippy writes:
So why are they only seeing one at
the center of spiral galaxies?

In a science brief a few weeks back it was reported that a ring of black
holes has been discovered orbiting the central SMBH of our galaxy, at a
distance out from the event horiz of just a few light years, IIRC.
--
John Savage (my news address is not valid for email)