A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Biological Evolution vs. Theological Creation



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 3rd 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
jdee@adexec.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Biological Evolution vs. Theological Creation


Bilge wrote:
, babbling space kadett:

In math, axiom IS used in that way.


No, it isn't. Axioms cannot be proven to be true. If you think so,
prove the following axioms:

(1) There is a natural number 0.


actually {0} is not a natural number, becus if it were, then it
had been a very wird natural number, very unnatural, therefore
it cant be a natural number

and this on my planet, i don know about your planet

(2) Every natural number a has a successor.


some people when explaining "a thing" usually include beside the N
natural number the {0} number, but this just becus tha explanation of
the "thing"

(3) There is no natural number whose successor is 0.

I await your proof (by the way - those come from the discipline known
as mathematics, if that helps.)


ary you awake dirk, bilge did it again



But I'm not a native speaker, may be I'm wrong. I don't like to argue about
the meaning of words. Feel free to replace "axiom" with "postulate".


But even then, the postulates need to be shown to be true/valid. Otherwise,
the theory is useless.


Stop taking advantage of people whose first language isn't english.
Ilja is correct. You are on some other planet. Don't forget to show
how those axioms are proved on your planet. On the other hand, if you


all this planets are confusing me as well

where am i?

where are we?

can't come up with a proof, then I suppose arithmetic is useless. in
which case you will have at least invalidated all of the physical theories
you don't like along with the rest.


Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Biological Evolution vs. Theological Creation main_engineering The Theory of Relativity 3 November 30th 05 03:54 PM
Biological Evolution vs. Theological Creation zzbunker@netscape.net The Theory of Relativity 0 November 28th 05 12:01 PM
Biological Evolution vs. Theological Creation litsohate@hotmail.com The Theory of Relativity 1 November 23rd 05 07:44 PM
Biological Evolution Rank Statistics Approximate Riccati Differential Equation OsherD Physics - General Discussion 1 October 3rd 05 07:18 AM
Bookmark my Ideas (Blogs) on Creation and Evolution of this Universe. Saravanan Physics - General Discussion 1 January 10th 05 07:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Internet Advertising - Bad Credit Mortgages - CPUs, Motherboards & RAM - Internet Advertising - Myspace Layouts