Begin forwarded message:

From: Jack Sarfatti
Date: November 27, 2005 2:24:57 PM PST
To: Doc Savage
Subject: Your STAIF paper FTL communication in orthodox QM?


On Nov 27, 2005, at 2:07 PM, Kim Burrafato wrote:
This very much reminds of similar schemes, a number of which employed MZ
interferometers, that you came up with back in the late 70s and early
80s! I remember a number of designs very close to this one, with a MZI
on one end and various detector arrangements on the other side. Weird!


Yes, but I never had it exactly right in terms of the apparatus, but I
did have his eqs. 5 & 6! I was trying to "disentangle" his eq. 1 to get
his eq 3. So I had the same formal idea for sure, but did not really
know how to implement it in the total experimental design as he seems to
have done. However, let's see what Stapp et-al have to say about this.

On Nov 27, 2005, at 1:52 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

The key is his fig 2 & eq. 3. At the moment, without thinking about it
very much, I cannot refute what he claims about eq. 3. Does anyone see
the error there? If there is no way to tell which path photon 2 takes
then there should be local interference according to Feynman. And it
seems there is no way to tell what state photon 1 was in on the left. So
why won't it work? Any opinions?