A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Richard Feynman, Murray Gell-Mann in Feynman's Rainbow & Metric Elasticityof Andrei Sakharov



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 27th 05 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,sci.skeptic,sci.philosophy.tech
Jack Sarfatti
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,218
Default Richard Feynman, Murray Gell-Mann in Feynman's Rainbow & Metric Elasticityof Andrei Sakharov


On Nov 26, 2005, at 9:00 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

bcc



B = Lp'd'(Goldstone1xGoldstone2x...) = curved part of Einstein-Cartan
tetrad 1-form

e.g. n independent Goldstone phases for

V(order parameter) = G(unordered vacuum)/H(ordered vacuum) ~ S1xS1 ...
(n times)

nth Homotopy Group(S1xS1x...) ~ Z (or at least not simply the identity
group)

"The Greek approach brings with it the full force of the logical
machinery of mathematics ... such as Murray's [Gell-Mann] classification
of particles. The Babylonian approach allows a certain freedom of
imagination ... without worrying about rigor and justification ... In
fact, physicists employing this kind of thinking sometimes violate the
formal rules of mathematics, or invent strange new (and unproved) math
of their own based on their understanding of experimental data ...
Feynman considered himself a Babylonian ... Murray was more a Greek"
Feynman's Rainbow p. 25
http://www.fotuva.org/feynman/feynman's_rainbow.html

On Nov 23, 2005, at 8:29 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:

bcc
OK thanks. :-)

Remember, I derive GR from the coherent Goldstone phases of the vacuum
order parameter. The basic formula is extremely simple

B = Lpd(Goldstone Phase)

B is non-trivial curved part of the tetrad 1-form.

Lp^2 = hG/c^3

This is analogous to

v = (h/m)Grad(Phase of Pilot Wave)

in Bohm theory and in superfluid theory.

That is, replace the quantum of circulation h/m for the "liquid" by the
quantum of "length" for the covariant "supersolid" "metric elastic"
(Sakharov) vacuum.

Note that when there are multiple Goldstone phases in the
Higgs-Goldstone field vacuum degenerate manifold

V = G(incoherent false vacuum without gravity)/H(coherent vacuum with
gravity)

The basic zero form is the product of the independent Goldstone phases.

For example: if

V = G/H ~ S2

there are 2 independent Goldstone Phase Fields THETA & PHI for the
geometrodynamic "monopole" stable topological defect from second
homotopy group PI(S2) ~ Z

Coherent vacuum 0-form is (THETA)(PHI)

dL = B(S2) = Lpd[(THETA)(PHI)] = Lp[(dTHETA)(PHI) + (THETA)(dPHI)]
length operator

dA = LpdB(S2) = Lp^2(dTheta)/\(dPHI) =/= 0 area operator

"Volume-without-volume" = World Hologram = Singular Gauss Theorem

Closed surface integral of dA surrounding a point defect in the vacuum
order parameter

is quantized in units of Lp^2(integer) = Lp^2(Sphere Wrapping Number)

from non-trivial second homotopy group ~ Z of V(S2) = G/H

Therefore I TRIVIALLY DERIVE the Bekenstein "Black Hole Thermodynamics"
conjecture.

Similarly, the singular form of Gauss's theorem is

Closed surface integral of dA surrounding a point defect in the vacuum
order parameter

= Interior volume integral of 'd'dA

This is the Bohm-Aharonov effect for geometrodynamics. That is,

'd'V is the "Volume-without-volume" operator. That is, exactly like in
the Bohm-Aharonov effect 'd'V is locally zero, but is globally non-zero.

We are literally Edwin Abbott's "FLATLANDERS" in this theory, i.e.
Holographic projections of 2D data.

Forget Loop Quantum Gravity - we don't need it.

Forget "Quantum Foam" - we don't need it and experiment will show it's
not there - if I am right here.

'd'V is the holographic projection "image" of the data on dA.

On the other hand, if we have THREE GOLDSTONE PHASES

V(S3) = G/H

Then dV =/= 0 even locally!

On Nov 23, 2005, at 1:42 AM, Carlos Castro wrote:

Dear Jack :

Look at the appendix in hep-th/0203221. Tomboulis
derives
a Gravitational Action from an underlying dynamics
involving fermions.
He does not start with GR but instead GR emerges as an
effective action

This is why I thought of your work.

Best wishes

Carlos



--- Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Thanks.

But what I am doing is different. They assume GR. I
am DERIVING GR
from the Higgs-Goldstone vacuum field. No one has
ever even thought
of that before I mean deriving the tetrad field from
the Goldstone
phases directly.

On Nov 22, 2005, at 1:30 AM, Carlos Castro wrote:

Dear Jack and Tony :

For your interest in Cosmological models building,
.....I am attaching a paper based on I.Segal and my
work, where the conformal group, Anti de Sitter,
etc
is very important. The relevant part concerning
my
work is how I derived ( from first princples )
that
the vacuum energy density is the geometric mean
between the Planck and Hubble scale ( ref-[10 ]of
attached paper ).

You may want also to look at Tomboulis paper :
Photons and Gravitons as Goldstone Bosons and the
Cosmological Constant.
hep-th/0203221.

Best wishes

Carlos







Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Richard Feynman, Murray Gell-Mann in Feynman's Rainbow & Metric Elasticityof Andrei Sakharov Jack Sarfatti Physics - General Discussion 0 November 27th 05 05:04 AM
Has Lenny Susskind surpassed Richard Feynman? Jack Sarfatti Physics - General Discussion 0 September 7th 05 05:20 AM
Cold Fusion , Zero Point Energy, Hal Puthoff & Andrei Sakharov Jack Sarfatti Physics - General Discussion 5 January 21st 05 11:42 PM
Gell-Mann didn't understand QM? Paul Physics - General Discussion 4 January 12th 04 10:42 PM
Richard Feynman and the Mole? eki The Theory of Relativity 5 December 29th 03 10:28 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Comprar vivienda Denia - Personal Loans - Repair Bad Credit - Vegas Hotel - Remortgages