![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: andrei, elasticityof, feynman, feynmans, gellmann, metric, murray, rainbow, richard, sakharov |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Nov 26, 2005, at 9:00 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: bcc B = Lp'd'(Goldstone1xGoldstone2x...) = curved part of Einstein-Cartan tetrad 1-form e.g. n independent Goldstone phases for V(order parameter) = G(unordered vacuum)/H(ordered vacuum) ~ S1xS1 ... (n times) nth Homotopy Group(S1xS1x...) ~ Z (or at least not simply the identity group) "The Greek approach brings with it the full force of the logical machinery of mathematics ... such as Murray's [Gell-Mann] classification of particles. The Babylonian approach allows a certain freedom of imagination ... without worrying about rigor and justification ... In fact, physicists employing this kind of thinking sometimes violate the formal rules of mathematics, or invent strange new (and unproved) math of their own based on their understanding of experimental data ... Feynman considered himself a Babylonian ... Murray was more a Greek" Feynman's Rainbow p. 25 http://www.fotuva.org/feynman/feynman's_rainbow.html On Nov 23, 2005, at 8:29 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: bcc OK thanks. :-) Remember, I derive GR from the coherent Goldstone phases of the vacuum order parameter. The basic formula is extremely simple B = Lpd(Goldstone Phase) B is non-trivial curved part of the tetrad 1-form. Lp^2 = hG/c^3 This is analogous to v = (h/m)Grad(Phase of Pilot Wave) in Bohm theory and in superfluid theory. That is, replace the quantum of circulation h/m for the "liquid" by the quantum of "length" for the covariant "supersolid" "metric elastic" (Sakharov) vacuum. Note that when there are multiple Goldstone phases in the Higgs-Goldstone field vacuum degenerate manifold V = G(incoherent false vacuum without gravity)/H(coherent vacuum with gravity) The basic zero form is the product of the independent Goldstone phases. For example: if V = G/H ~ S2 there are 2 independent Goldstone Phase Fields THETA & PHI for the geometrodynamic "monopole" stable topological defect from second homotopy group PI(S2) ~ Z Coherent vacuum 0-form is (THETA)(PHI) dL = B(S2) = Lpd[(THETA)(PHI)] = Lp[(dTHETA)(PHI) + (THETA)(dPHI)] length operator dA = LpdB(S2) = Lp^2(dTheta)/\(dPHI) =/= 0 area operator "Volume-without-volume" = World Hologram = Singular Gauss Theorem Closed surface integral of dA surrounding a point defect in the vacuum order parameter is quantized in units of Lp^2(integer) = Lp^2(Sphere Wrapping Number) from non-trivial second homotopy group ~ Z of V(S2) = G/H Therefore I TRIVIALLY DERIVE the Bekenstein "Black Hole Thermodynamics" conjecture. Similarly, the singular form of Gauss's theorem is Closed surface integral of dA surrounding a point defect in the vacuum order parameter = Interior volume integral of 'd'dA This is the Bohm-Aharonov effect for geometrodynamics. That is, 'd'V is the "Volume-without-volume" operator. That is, exactly like in the Bohm-Aharonov effect 'd'V is locally zero, but is globally non-zero. We are literally Edwin Abbott's "FLATLANDERS" in this theory, i.e. Holographic projections of 2D data. Forget Loop Quantum Gravity - we don't need it. Forget "Quantum Foam" - we don't need it and experiment will show it's not there - if I am right here. 'd'V is the holographic projection "image" of the data on dA. On the other hand, if we have THREE GOLDSTONE PHASES V(S3) = G/H Then dV =/= 0 even locally! On Nov 23, 2005, at 1:42 AM, Carlos Castro wrote: Dear Jack : Look at the appendix in hep-th/0203221. Tomboulis derives a Gravitational Action from an underlying dynamics involving fermions. He does not start with GR but instead GR emerges as an effective action This is why I thought of your work. Best wishes Carlos --- Jack Sarfatti wrote: Thanks. But what I am doing is different. They assume GR. I am DERIVING GR from the Higgs-Goldstone vacuum field. No one has ever even thought of that before I mean deriving the tetrad field from the Goldstone phases directly. On Nov 22, 2005, at 1:30 AM, Carlos Castro wrote: Dear Jack and Tony : For your interest in Cosmological models building, .....I am attaching a paper based on I.Segal and my work, where the conformal group, Anti de Sitter, etc is very important. The relevant part concerning my work is how I derived ( from first princples ) that the vacuum energy density is the geometric mean between the Planck and Hubble scale ( ref-[10 ]of attached paper ). You may want also to look at Tomboulis paper : Photons and Gravitons as Goldstone Bosons and the Cosmological Constant. hep-th/0203221. Best wishes Carlos |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Richard Feynman, Murray Gell-Mann in Feynman's Rainbow & Metric Elasticityof Andrei Sakharov | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | November 27th 05 06:04 AM |
| Has Lenny Susskind surpassed Richard Feynman? | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | September 7th 05 06:20 AM |
| Cold Fusion , Zero Point Energy, Hal Puthoff & Andrei Sakharov | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | January 22nd 05 12:42 AM |
| Gell-Mann didn't understand QM? | Paul | Physics - General Discussion | 4 | January 12th 04 11:42 PM |
| Richard Feynman and the Mole? | eki | The Theory of Relativity | 5 | December 29th 03 11:28 AM |