Sam Wormley wrote: Androcles wrote:
"tadchem" wrote in message
oups.com...
Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...887412,00.html :
THE RESULTS

Royal Society scientists

Newton 86.2%
Einstein 13.8%

Members of the public

Newton 61.8%
Einstein 38.2%

This was an on-line (i.e. unscientific) poll of *perceived relative
merit* of the work of both individuals.

While I agree that Newton's work was more diverse and represented a
greater shift in thinking (compared to previous ideas) than Einstein's,
Einstein's relativity theory is a more accurate description of the
operation of the universe than Newton's.



Idiotic nonsense.




Where the difference between the theoretical predictions of the two
views is measurable, ALL measurements support Einstein over Newton.


How about the magnitude of V1493Aql? Isn't that a measurement?


To call the results of this crude poll representative of a 'conversion'
is myopic and arrogant.


Sagnac for the lab, and
http://www.britastro.org/vss/gifc/00918-ck.gif
Explanation:
http://www.ebicom.net/~rsf1/sekerin.htm (fig 3)

(Or stars explode twice in three months).
That explanation is Newtonian, myopic Einstein doesn't have an explanation,
none at all.

You are myopic, ignorant and arrogant, Davidson.

Androcles.



Androcles doesn't understand much of physics, let alone GTR. Just
ignore him.
http://www.google.com/search?q=Andro...ers.pandora.be

A *CRACKED pot* calls the kettle, "Black-ass.!!"

brian a m stuckless