"Mathlete" wrote in message
oups.com...
Let two hypothetical observers exist in space
(wearing space suits) far from any large concentration of mass/energy
that would "warp"
space-time. Let one observer (using rocket power) start moving with
uniform acceleration in a
straight line from the other. Is there any simple
set of invariant coordinate transformation equations from a fixed
coordinate system to a
coordinate system moving with the uniformly
accelerated observer? Can we address this simple type of problem
outside of the umbrella of GR?


Hey moron!
You asked the same question in sci.physics.relativity, now you post it again
in sci.physics. Read the same answer.
Androcles

Androcles wrote:
"Mathlete" wrote in message
oups.com...

Androcles wrote:
"Mathlete" wrote in message
oups.com...
Let two hypothetical observers exist in space
(wearing space suits) far from any large concentration of mass/energy
that would "warp"
space-time. Let one observer (using rocket power) start moving with
uniform acceleration in a
straight line from the other. Is there any simple
set of invariant coordinate transformation equations from a fixed
coordinate system to a
coordinate system moving with the uniformly
accelerated observer? Can we address this simple type of problem
outside of the umbrella of GR?


Hey moron!
You asked the same question in sci.physics.relativity, now you post it
again
in sci.physics. Read the same answer.
Androcles

Actually, I may have answered my own question. See my post on
Cubic Complex Variables / Applications. Now there exists a
generalization
of the Lorentz Transforms to the case of Uniformly Accelerated Motion!

If a boson is bosonic
then is Androcles moronic?
Or is he still just Neanderthonic!?

If you were a math expert as you claim, you would know that
the distance from A to B has the opposite sign to the distance
from B to A.
If you were a math expert as you claim, you would know that
division by zero is undefined.

I never stated anything that is contrary to that.

But you are not a math expert, you are just another phuckwit
with his head up his arse, blowing cuckoo transformation smoke.
Androcles.

Somewhere within your 4 letter words
there is a clear voice to be heard.
So be quiet and let that voice speak.
Go ahead and try it at least for a week.

Do a Web Search on the Acceleration of Light!
It is an idea whose time has come.

"Mathlete" wrote in message
oups.com...

Androcles wrote:
"Mathlete" wrote in message
oups.com...

Androcles wrote:
"Mathlete" wrote in message
oups.com...
Let two hypothetical observers exist in space
(wearing space suits) far from any large concentration of
mass/energy
that would "warp"
space-time. Let one observer (using rocket power) start moving with
uniform acceleration in a
straight line from the other. Is there any simple
set of invariant coordinate transformation equations from a fixed
coordinate system to a
coordinate system moving with the uniformly
accelerated observer? Can we address this simple type of problem
outside of the umbrella of GR?


Hey moron!
You asked the same question in sci.physics.relativity, now you post it
again
in sci.physics. Read the same answer.
Androcles

Actually, I may have answered my own question. See my post on
Cubic Complex Variables / Applications. Now there exists a
generalization
of the Lorentz Transforms to the case of Uniformly Accelerated Motion!

If a boson is bosonic
then is Androcles moronic?
Or is he still just Neanderthonic!?

If you were a math expert as you claim, you would know that
the distance from A to B has the opposite sign to the distance
from B to A.
If you were a math expert as you claim, you would know that
division by zero is undefined.

I never stated anything that is contrary to that.

You said:
"Now there exists a generalization of the Lorentz Transforms to the case of
Uniformly Accelerated Motion!"

If you were math expert as you claim you'd know the cuckoo transforms that
Einstein blamed Lorentz for we derived from c = 0, and division by zero is
undefined.

The inspiration for Einstein was:
H.G. Wells "Time Machine", a best-seller when Einstein was a teenager.
Swiss cheese with holes in it like his math.
Swiss cuckoo clocks he examined patent applications for.
And this: http://www.jimloy.com/geometry/every.htm, (Rouse Ball in 1892),
modified as:
[quote]
we establish by definition that the "time" required by a turtle to travel
from A to B equals the "time" it requires to travel from B to A.
[end quote]
Ref: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
Einstein can prove nothing can go faster than a turtle, just as Rouse Ball
proved all triangles are isosceles.

Oops!... Did I say 'a turtle'? Sorry...'light'.

"In agreement with experience we further assume the quantity
2AB/(t'A-tA) = c,
to be a universal constant--the velocity of light in empty space." --
Einstein.

In agreement with experience,
x = AB
-x = BA,
x + (-x) = 0.
Hence c = 0.

"Hagrid had Norbert packed and ready in a large crate.
'He's got lots o' rats an' some brandy fer the journey',
said Hagrid in a muffled voice. 'An' I packed his teddy
bear in case he gets lonely'.
From inside the crate came ripping noises that sounded to
Harry as though teddy was having his head torn off."
--J.K. Rowling, "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone.".


But you are not a math expert, you are just another phuckwit
with his head up his arse, blowing cuckoo transformation smoke.
Androcles.

Somewhere within your 4 letter words
there is a clear voice to be heard.
So be quiet and let that voice speak.
Go ahead and try it at least for a week.

Ok...


Do a Web Search on the Acceleration of Light!
It is an idea whose time has come.

"Someday some enterprising engineer will construct a light accelerator for
interplanetary communication, and Einstein's crackpot notions will fall
apart by ..."
sci.physics.relativity - Nov 3 1999, 8:01 am by Androcles


From: "Androcles"
Subject: WHY SHOULD THE SPEED OF LIGHT BE CONSTANT? WHY SHOULD THERE BE
A LEAST UPPER BOUND FOR SPEEDS?
Date: 1999/11/03
Message-ID: #1/1
X-Deja-AN: 544143336
References:


















X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: news.rdc1.pa.home.com 941668994 24.1.47.166 (Wed, 03 Nov 1999
14:43:14 PST)
Organization: @Home Network
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Reply-To: "Androcles"
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 14:43:14 PST
Newsgroups:
sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.sci.physics .new-theories,alt.sci.time-travel,sci.astro,sci.math,sci.logic



Was I pre-dated by someone? :-)

Androcles.