Without the frilly bits the only way that I can see that force can be
tansmited over a time/space distance is by modification of that very
same time/space distance either by field or foot, anybody with other
ideas ?

Sig ZZzzzzz (:-)

significant zero wrote:
Without the frilly bits the only way that I can see that force can be
tansmited over a time/space distance is by modification of that very
same time/space distance either by field or foot, anybody with other
ideas ?

Sig ZZzzzzz (:-)

Yes...
I have an idea that if Mendleev had made a study of unknown elements
....they would still be unknown. )

Sue...

Sue... wrote:
significant zero wrote:
Without the frilly bits the only way that I can see that force can be
tansmited over a time/space distance is by modification of that very
same time/space distance either by field or foot, anybody with other
ideas ?

Sig ZZzzzzz (:-)

Yes...
I have an idea that if Mendleev had made a study of unknown elements
...they would still be unknown. )

Sue...

Thats a bit of a put down on old M. aint it as the study of something
tends to make it less unknown ? dont it ? your begining to convince me
that you are a confirmed romantic Sue (:-)

BTW Opera 8.5 has a printing bug in it so that it only prints the first
page of multipage doc's. I tried to tell them but lost concentration.
My speeling will be all over the shop now as I cant easily check the
spelling of my posts in google, blast!!!

Sig ZZzzzzz

significant zero wrote:
Sue... wrote:
significant zero wrote:
Without the frilly bits the only way that I can see that force can be
tansmited over a time/space distance is by modification of that very
same time/space distance either by field or foot, anybody with other
ideas ?

Sig ZZzzzzz (:-)

Yes...
I have an idea that if Mendleev had made a study of unknown elements
...they would still be unknown. )

Sue...

Thats a bit of a put down on old M. aint it as the study of something
tends to make it less unknown ? dont it ? your begining to convince me
that you are a confirmed romantic Sue (:-)

That isn't a put down. That is really how he did it.
Mendeleev's periodic table--notice the gaps. ...
His work was published in 1871 some 25 years before
the discovery of the electron. The families of elements in
his chart have similar properties with these properties
changing in a systematic way as we proceed from one
element to another within each family. One of the things that
Mendeleev was successful at doing was to predict the properties
of unknown elements. In fact, he even instructed investigators
where to look for these undiscovered elements.
http://chem.lapeer.org/Chem1Docs/Mendeleev.html



BTW Opera 8.5 has a printing bug in it so that it only prints the first
page of multipage doc's. I tried to tell them but lost concentration.
My speeling will be all over the shop now as I cant easily check the
spelling of my posts in google, blast!!!
That isn't a problem.
In this ng orhter posters will do that for you.


Sue...

Sig ZZzzzzz

"significant zero" wrote in message
oups.com...
Without the frilly bits the only way that I can see that force can be
tansmited over a time/space distance is by modification of that very
same time/space distance either by field or foot, anybody with other
ideas ?

Sig ZZzzzzz (:-)


The first frill to strip out out that is the "time/space" bull****.
Don't start a thread with the very crap you want stripped.
Fields are, so start there.
Androcles.

"significant zero" wrote in message
ups.com...
Sue... wrote:
significant zero wrote:
Without the frilly bits the only way that I can see that force can be
tansmited over a time/space distance is by modification of that very
same time/space distance either by field or foot, anybody with other
ideas ?

Sig ZZzzzzz (:-)

Yes...
I have an idea that if Mendleev had made a study of unknown elements
...they would still be unknown. )

Sue...

Thats a bit of a put down on old M. aint it as the study of something
tends to make it less unknown ? dont it ?


Fields exist. Sue thinks they can't unless she has some charge whizzing
around to create them.
Which came first, the meadow in the forest or the forest around the meadow?
Androcles.





your begining to convince me
that you are a confirmed romantic Sue (:-)

BTW Opera 8.5 has a printing bug in it so that it only prints the first
page of multipage doc's. I tried to tell them but lost concentration.
My speeling will be all over the shop now as I cant easily check the
spelling of my posts in google, blast!!!

Sig ZZzzzzz

"significant zero" wrote in message
oups.com...
Without the frilly bits the only way that I can see that force can be
tansmited over a time/space distance is by modification of that very
same time/space distance either by field or foot, anybody with other
ideas ?

See http://web.pdx.edu/~hedberg/files/di...rodynamics.pdf

Bill


Sig ZZzzzzz (:-)

Bill Hobba wrote:
"significant zero" wrote in message
oups.com...
Without the frilly bits the only way that I can see that force can be
tansmited over a time/space distance is by modification of that very
same time/space distance either by field or foot, anybody with other
ideas ?

See http://web.pdx.edu/~hedberg/files/di...rodynamics.pdf

No wonder so many students of Einstein come down with the dt's.
A separate space:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_integral
A separate time:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_Theorem

BB, intelligent design and creationism is entirely optional.
http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle1629.htm

:-)

Sue...


Bill


Sig ZZzzzzz (:-)

Androcles wrote:
"significant zero" wrote in message
oups.com...
Without the frilly bits the only way that I can see that force can be
tansmited over a time/space distance is by modification of that very
same time/space distance either by field or foot, anybody with other
ideas ?

Sig ZZzzzzz (:-)


The first frill to strip out out that is the "time/space" bull****.
Don't start a thread with the very crap you want stripped.
Fields are, so start there.
Androcles.

Great, but then we have describe a field in terms that provide a
mechanism for force and as this works across time/space we have to
include them in any explanation. If you wish to rename, describe and
quantifiy time and space then be my guest but I have done my best by
using time/space instead of space/time etc as the ingredients and
transmiters of force.
How now brown cow (:-) ****

sig zzzz

Bill Hobba wrote:
"significant zero" wrote in message
oups.com...
Without the frilly bits the only way that I can see that force can be
tansmited over a time/space distance is by modification of that very
same time/space distance either by field or foot, anybody with other
ideas ?

See http://web.pdx.edu/~hedberg/files/di...rodynamics.pdf

Bill

Thanks Bill seems fairly frilly.


Sig ZZzzzzz (:-)