"Juan R." wrote in
oups.com:

Lin Xiong, . Dirk Van de moortel,

Curiously, a debate was launched in sci.physics.research about EinsteIn
supposed priorities and nobody was able to *prove* with ***data*** that
Einstein was the father of special or general relativity. Many people
there agree with 'my' point of view.

snip

One day several great scientists met at the edge of a meadow. Each one
of them brought an apple seed. One wearing boots poked a hole in the
ground and each scientist dropped his seed into the little hole. Then
the hole was covered and the scientists went their own way.

About 100 years later I am at the same (relative:-) spot gathering apples.

It doesn't matter to me, nor do I see any legitimate reason anyone would
care at this late date, which seed grew into the tree. I am quite happy
to harvest the fruit knowing each of those personal heros had some hand
in the tree being there for me.

On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:42:56 -0500, Al Zenner wrote:

"Juan R." wrote in
roups.com:

Lin Xiong, . Dirk Van de moortel,

Curiously, a debate was launched in sci.physics.research about EinsteIn
supposed priorities and nobody was able to *prove* with ***data*** that
Einstein was the father of special or general relativity. Many people
there agree with 'my' point of view.

snip

One day several great scientists met at the edge of a meadow. Each one
of them brought an apple seed. One wearing boots poked a hole in the
ground and each scientist dropped his seed into the little hole. Then
the hole was covered and the scientists went their own way.

About 100 years later I am at the same (relative:-) spot gathering apples.

It doesn't matter to me, nor do I see any legitimate reason anyone would
care at this late date, which seed grew into the tree. I am quite happy
to harvest the fruit knowing each of those personal heros had some hand
in the tree being there for me.

IOW, you're just an ass kisser, like Dick van de merde and the others.
ahahaha...

Louis Savain

Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm

Traveler wrote in
:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:42:56 -0500, Al Zenner wrote:

snip

IOW, you're just an ass kisser, like Dick van de merde and the others.
ahahaha...

Louis Savain

Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm

I already knew you for a fool, thanks for appearing on cue.
I expect to make your day quite often. You might want to
save your (ascii) halitosis for someone who cares or at
least flinches. Aw heck, you'd even settle for someone
who might think twice about what you have to say even if
they change their mind quickly.

On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:00:25 -0500, Al Zenner wrote:

Traveler wrote in
:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:42:56 -0500, Al Zenner wrote:

snip

IOW, you're just an ass kisser, like Dick van de merde and the others.
ahahaha...

Louis Savain

Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm

I already knew you for a fool, thanks for appearing on cue.
I expect to make your day quite often. You might want to
save your (ascii) halitosis for someone who cares or at
least flinches. Aw heck, you'd even settle for someone
who might think twice about what you have to say even if
they change their mind quickly.

ahahaha... I cranked you big time. ahahaha...

Louis Savain

Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm

Traveler wrote in
:

snip same old same old hallucination

Savin, if you're actually trying to torque someone you should try
to make it original and interesting. Try to make your posts worth
a chuckle at the very least. So far you come off as merely pathetic.
I realize my standards might be beyond your capabilities, but you
could try to give it a better shot next time. Make it really good
and make it soon, ok kiddo? I'll be watching.

You know, Savin, Einstein has been dead for a while, and even dead
he's a lot smarter than you.

Get it?

On the other hand, if you knew anything at all about physics you
might try to get involved on that level. Personally I prefer physics
to insults, but sometimes the course of a discussion affords no other
reasonable choice. Either approach you decide to take I expect great
improvement in your future posts.

Al Zenner wrote:
Traveler wrote in
:

snip same old same old hallucination

Savin, if you're actually trying to torque someone you should try
to make it original and interesting. Try to make your posts worth
a chuckle at the very least. So far you come off as merely pathetic.
I realize my standards might be beyond your capabilities, but you
could try to give it a better shot next time. Make it really good
and make it soon, ok kiddo? I'll be watching.

You know, Savin, Einstein has been dead for a while, and even dead
he's a lot smarter than you.

Get it?

On the other hand, if you knew anything at all about physics you
might try to get involved on that level. Personally I prefer physics
to insults, but sometimes the course of a discussion affords no other
reasonable choice. Either approach you decide to take I expect great
improvement in your future posts.

Albert E meets (say Humboldt coming back from the New World):
"May I have one of those seeds? What are they?"
(plants seed)
"Hey World, look what _I_ have produced!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not only was AE a plagiarist, he was too bloody dumb to notice the
mistakes and contradictions in the stuff he was stealing!

Jim G
c'=c+v

" wrote in
oups.com:

Albert E meets (say Humboldt coming back from the New World):
"May I have one of those seeds? What are they?"
(plants seed)
"Hey World, look what _I_ have produced!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not only was AE a plagiarist, he was too bloody dumb to notice the
mistakes and contradictions in the stuff he was stealing!


I don't care if AE or someone else noticed that apple seed in
horse**** and picked it out, or whose hands it was in enroute
or who actually planted it to make the tree which bears apples
I use today.

That your opinion is based on something other than the usefulness
of the apples (tools) isn't a problem to me. But I am not going
to get all wrapped up in your nonissue.

"Al Zenner" wrote in message ...
" wrote in
oups.com:

Albert E meets (say Humboldt coming back from the New World):
"May I have one of those seeds? What are they?"
(plants seed)
"Hey World, look what _I_ have produced!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Not only was AE a plagiarist, he was too bloody dumb to notice the
mistakes and contradictions in the stuff he was stealing!


I don't care if AE or someone else noticed that apple seed in
horse**** and picked it out, or whose hands it was in enroute
or who actually planted it to make the tree which bears apples
I use today.

That your opinion is based on something other than the usefulness
of the apples (tools) isn't a problem to me.

hm, his opinion is highly based on a lack of usefulness:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...ityCancer.html
| "If Relativity were 100% correct, long before now everything
| from a cancer cure to no world food shortage (anywhere)
| should have been achieved."

But I am not going
to get all wrapped up in your nonissue.

But it can be rather entertaining :-)

Dirk Vdm

On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:16:09 -0500, Al Zenner wrote:

Traveler wrote in
:

snip same old same old hallucination

Savin, if you're actually trying to torque someone you should try
to make it original and interesting. Try to make your posts worth
a chuckle at the very least. So far you come off as merely pathetic.
I realize my standards might be beyond your capabilities, but you
could try to give it a better shot next time. Make it really good
and make it soon, ok kiddo? I'll be watching.

You know, Savin, Einstein has been dead for a while, and even dead
he's a lot smarter than you.

Get it?

On the other hand, if you knew anything at all about physics you
might try to get involved on that level. Personally I prefer physics
to insults, but sometimes the course of a discussion affords no other
reasonable choice. Either approach you decide to take I expect great
improvement in your future posts.

ahahaha... You're crankier than I thought. ahahahaha...the mark of an
ass kisser. ahahaha... just like Sam Wormley and Dick van de ****...
ahahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...

Louis Savain

Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm

"Traveler" wrote in message ...
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:16:09 -0500, Al Zenner wrote:

Traveler wrote in
:

snip same old same old hallucination

Savin, if you're actually trying to torque someone you should try
to make it original and interesting. Try to make your posts worth
a chuckle at the very least. So far you come off as merely pathetic.
I realize my standards might be beyond your capabilities, but you
could try to give it a better shot next time. Make it really good
and make it soon, ok kiddo? I'll be watching.

You know, Savin, Einstein has been dead for a while, and even dead
he's a lot smarter than you.

Get it?

On the other hand, if you knew anything at all about physics you
might try to get involved on that level. Personally I prefer physics
to insults, but sometimes the course of a discussion affords no other
reasonable choice. Either approach you decide to take I expect great
improvement in your future posts.

ahahaha... You're crankier than I thought. ahahahaha...the mark of an
ass kisser. ahahaha... just like Sam Wormley and Dick van de ****...
ahahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...

Louis Savain

Savain, you can do better:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di.../Insanity.html

Dirk Vdm