![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: energyquot, gravitational, quotthe, source |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rdc wrote: Singularity. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
To all,
The source of gravitational energy is the uneven radiation of gravitons, when two bodies are in relative close proximity to each other. Since each body emits more gravitons away from the other body than towards it, the backpressure created by the uneven transmission of gravitons by each body, pushes it towards the adjacent body. For a more complete explanation see the third of my 'Selected Papers' titled: 'Foundations for Proposed Unified Field Theory' which you will find at my website at: http://www2.rideau.net/gaasbeek Enjoy, Len. .................................................. ......................... "Rdc" wrote in message .. . |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Len Gaasenbeek" wrote in message ... To all, YAWNNNNNnnnnnnn................. Andro....(snoooooooozzzeeee) |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The source of gravitational energy is the uneven radiation of gravitons,
when two bodies are in relative close proximity to each other. Len, You are leaving out the source of gravitational energy, precisley that being what the source(s) of gravitons is as a whole, meaning all remaining physical and nonphysical "anomalies" within such conclusion. Colin Murphy Franklin, NC |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Len,
And I see no such thing as backpressure as to propose a sort of suction. Though there certainly is an interaction which proposes "interaction" rather than mearly an attraction/pull............. The science of which may be obtained by way of constant searching within your own mind assisted by pen and paper. Perhaps the subject upon a fallen leaf to start your journey. Your roots lie further than he, and even further lies the answer. Sorry. Colin Murphy Franklin, NC |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:08:25 GMT, "Black Knight" wrote:
"Len Gaasenbeek" wrote in message ... To all, YAWNNNNNnnnnnnn................. Andro....(snoooooooozzzeeee) It's not such a bad idea, A. 'Gravity shielding' actually works. HW. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm see: www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/variablestars.exe "Sometimes I feel like a complete failure. The most useful thing I have ever done is prove Einstein wrong". |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
To C.A.M.
"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" Len. .................................................. "C.A.M" wrote in message ups.com... Len, And I see no such thing as backpressure as to propose a sort of suction. Though there certainly is an interaction which proposes "interaction" rather than mearly an attraction/pull............. The science of which may be obtained by way of constant searching within your own mind assisted by pen and paper. Perhaps the subject upon a fallen leaf to start your journey. Your roots lie further than he, and even further lies the answer. Sorry. Colin Murphy Franklin, NC |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... The source of gravitational energy is the uneven radiation of gravitons, when two bodies are in relative close proximity to each other. Len, You are leaving out the source of gravitational energy, precisley that being what the source(s) of gravitons is as a whole, meaning all remaining physical and nonphysical "anomalies" within such conclusion. Colin Murphy Franklin, NC .................................................. ............ To Colin, To answer your above question, read my paper 'Foundation for Proposed Unified Field Theory' at: http://www2.rideau.net/gaasbeek For a more complete understanding, read all my 'Selected Papers'. Len. .................................................. ............. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message news ![]() On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:08:25 GMT, "Black Knight" wrote: "Len Gaasenbeek" wrote in message ... To all, YAWNNNNNnnnnnnn................. Andro....(snoooooooozzzeeee) It's not such a bad idea, A. 'Gravity shielding' actually works. HW. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm see: www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/variablestars.exe "Sometimes I feel like a complete failure. The most useful thing I have ever done is prove Einstein wrong". ............................................. To Henri, Could you give me an example of 'gravity shielding' you know of please? Enjoy, Len. ............................................ |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "The Source of Gravitational Energy" | Skrow | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | January 1st 06 11:13 PM |
| "The Source of Gravitational Energy" | Rdc | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | November 17th 05 02:59 AM |
| "The Source of Gravitational Energy" | Einsteinhoax | Physics - General Discussion | 4 | September 28th 05 01:48 AM |
| "The Source of Gravitational Energy" | Tpa | Physics - General Discussion | 4 | August 16th 05 03:47 AM |
| "The Source of Gravitational Energy" | Tpa | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | August 15th 05 08:44 PM |