A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 15th 05 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,alt.philosophy,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,sci.math
AllYou!
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,311
Default MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM.

Hello All,

Please respect that Moving Dimensions Theory is just a theory.




As opposed to what?



The speed of light only exists for light. Nothing does anything at the speed of
light.





Why does time's arrow point in the direction it points in? Why
entropy?




Time is a mathematical tool established to chart the progress of any and all
processes. Entropy is just a process.







What deeper reality underlies Einstein's postulates of relativity?




Physics is not about reality.





What deeper reality underlies Newton's laws?




See the above.



Why does general relativity fail at short distances?




What makes you think it does? Define *short*.



Why does quantum
mechanics dominate at short distances?




See the above.



Why have so many great minds, Einestin, Godel, Wheeler, Hawking, and
Penrose called for a new conception of time?




Do they?

Ads
  #2  
Old November 20th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Daniel Weston
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 947
Default MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but anemerg...


Time, means aging.

Time keeping, means to set up a method of tracking aging.

Time utilization, is the use of time and time keeping, for the use of
mankind in its numerous applications. (e.g. pico second,
minute, hour, day, year, century, etc.)





































  #3  
Old November 20th 05 posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.chem,sci.physics.particle,sci.math
brian a m stuckless
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,468
Default MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but anemerg...

TiME is.
brian a m stuckless

Daniel Weston wrote:

Time, means aging.

Time keeping, means to set up a method of tracking aging.

Time utilization, is the use of time and time keeping, for the use of
mankind in its numerous applications. (e.g. pico second,
minute, hour, day, year, century, etc.)
.


  #4  
Old November 21st 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
AllYou!
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,311
Default MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but anemerg...


"Daniel Weston" wrote in message
...

Time, means aging.


Time is a means of tracking aging, dufus, just like it's used to track every
other physical process. It doesn't *mean* it.


Time keeping, means to set up a method of tracking aging.


Time is that method, dip****.


Time utilization, is the use of time and time keeping, for the use of
mankind in its numerous applications. (e.g. pico second,
minute, hour, day, year, century, etc.)



Time utilization means to do complete one process as quickly as possible WRT
other processes.

Are you really that stupid?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM. Paul Cardinale Physics - General Discussion 2 December 2nd 05 03:31 AM
MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM. rehamkcirtap@gmail.com The Theory of Relativity 2 November 22nd 05 09:14 AM
MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM. AllYou! Physics - General Discussion 1 November 20th 05 02:13 AM
MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM. Black Knight Physics - General Discussion 2 November 15th 05 04:52 PM
MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emergent property of the fourth dimension expanding relative to the three spatial dimensions: unifying GR, SR, and QM. donstockbauer@hotmail.com Physics - General Discussion 0 November 15th 05 12:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Christian college online degrees - PrePaid Credit Cards - MPAA - Problem Mortgage - Loans