A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , ,

absorbed mass of light ..MEASURED References.!!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 11th 05 posted to alt.bible.prophecy,alt.bible,sci.physics.relativity
brian a m stuckless
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,468
Default absorbed mass of light ..MEASURED References.!!

$ IAM THAT iAMBiA Him-in-it He-der THEORY (He-ALL-der):
"Sources" AND "emf" MAKE UP interSTELLAR MEDiA, dooOPs.!! NO void.!!
Avagadro's LAW is *PROOF* of an interFACE BETWEEN molar particles.!!
OTHERwise, ALL objects COMMONLY made manifest to us such as ROCKs or
interSTELLAR DUST would COLLAPSE to pointLiKE mass NEAR ZERO Kelvin.

ALL GUESS iSS (n - 1) CODATA mass is SUBMERGED in THAT iAMBiA MEDiA.

$ RED-and-BLUE-shifted RAW DATA
There is ONLY ONE painfully OBViOUS answer.!!
One would have to KNOW EXACT the VARiOUS pathWAY particle COUNTs.!!
The apparently RED-or-BLUE-shifted RAW DATA is due to *PEGGED* c.!!
RED & BLUE shift GOEs if one KNOWs the *ACTUAL AVERAGE* velocity.!!
For the PiONEER ANOMALY disappears with RAW DATA corrected for c.!!
[ A pathWAY THROUGH a STELLAR ambient GRADiENT, however, is EASY. ]
[ A pathWAY THROUGH UNknown interSTELLAR ambient is, NOT-so-EASY. ]

brian a m stuckless

wrote:
The universe is as it was and will be. Stars & galaxies etc explode,
reform etc. Gravity attracts many of these objects together, some
collide etc. The objects move wrt each other, some pass by and some
collide. This cosmic brew indefinitely continues on.... Thats is what
you call your "static" universe. Sources of EM waves far away from us
travel through the interstellar void, --


insert ..see top of [rePOST 2] PAGE.!!

-- hitting and being absorbed by
some debries (objects) hence further reducing their observed intensity.


Now I am trying to understand how this scenario produces redshift... Of
course some photons are absorbed by interstellar matter hence we count
less photons per unit time, but the ones that do make it to us still
have their initial frequency (energy)...? --


insert ..see top of [rePOST 2] PAGE.!!

-- Something I am missing here...Care to elaborate or to explain
further?

He-der THEORY (He-ALL-der) with RED-and-BLUE-shifted RAW DATA.!!


Autymn D. C. wrote: Tice with a J wrote: Y.Porat wrote:
energy is mas in motion and there is nothing but one kind
of mass rest mass relativistic mass is an
invention of ****en mathematicians. it will take another
100 years to stick it into the thick parroting skulls


Of course there's only one kind of mass. Mass is constant.
There is only relativistic kinetic energy.


Wrong, mass is variable with mechanic energy. Relativistic mass has
the same dimension as rest mass, so it must be mass also.

-Aut


PROTON mass mp CODATA standard NEW SI GUESS iSS ..definition:
_ _
| m1*v1^2 m1 G*M1*m1 m1^2*v1^2 |
|{-- - --( -- + 1)} + (-- -- -- -- --) - (-- -- -- --)| = mp
| 2*c^2 M1 (n - 1)*r1*c^2 2*M1*c^2 |
-- --
_ _
| G*M1*m1 m1*v1^2 | = [(a + 1)*u] = [a*u + u]
= |(-- -- -- -- --) + (-- - --)|
| (n - 1)*r1*c^2 2*c^2 | = [(a + 1)*(H_y - me)]
-- --

mN 2*mN Ub*mN Ub*me (a + 1)*me hbar*{e}
= -- - -- = -- -- = -- -- = -- -- = -- --- -- = -- -- --
(ae + 1) ge Ue Un 10^4*Qx 2*Un

= D_2 + a*u - mp = H_2 + a*u - me = u + a*u = eM_mp / c^2.

2. Let, eM = PROTON mass mp*c^2 ..to see 3 QUARK definitions.
GUESS iSS PROTON iNTRiNSiC REST energy eM FRAME-of-REFERENCE:
_ _
| m1*v1^2 m1 G*M1*m1 m1^2*v1^2 |
= |{-- - --( -- + 1)} + (-- -- - --) - (-- --- --)| = mp*c^2
| 2 M1 (n - 1)*r1 2*M1 |
-- --
= [ L + eG - eK ]

= [ L + eF ] = L + eF

= [ E - eK ] = E - eK
_ _
| G*M1*m1 m1*v1^2 |
= |(-- -- - --) + (-- - --)| = [(u + a*u)*c^2] = eG - eV
| (n - 1)*r1 2 |
-- -- = [(D_2 - u)*c^2]

= [ eG - eV ] = [(H_y + a*u - me)*c^2]

= [ eG + (L - eK) ] = [(D_2 + a*u - mp)*c^2]
_ _ _ _
|(mol part)*K*Volt*(sec)^2 | |(mol part)*K*A*Ohm*(sec)^2 |
= |-- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- |=|-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- |
| length | | length |
-- -- -- --
_ _ _ _
|(mol part)*K*Volt*(sec)^4*c^2| | (mol part)*K*Weber |
= |-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --|=|-- -- -- --- -- -- -- --|
| (length)^3 | | c |
-- -- -- --
_ _ _ _
|(mol part)*K*Volt*length| |mass*(meter)^2|
= | -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --| ..in the units |-- -- -- -- --|
| c^2 | | (sec)^2 |
-- -- -- --.

3. Note "length" can be a volume / surface area SHAPE FACTOR.

4. Equivalent iNTRiNSiC TEST REST mass, cavity (n) = mD / m1.

5 CHANGiNG a VELOCiTY's (DiRECTiON, MAGNiTUDE, or *SHAPE*) /
DURATiON, or SHAPE-change-RATE / DURATiON, is *ACCELERATiON*.

6. VELOCiTY = vector / DURATiON; SPEED = the path / DURATiON.
Of course, with a RADiAL velocity, DiRECTiON *CANNOT* CHANGE.
RADiAL velocity is 3*VELOCiTY volume / surface area*DURATiON.

7. Gravitational constant G has units (meter)^3 / kg*(sec)^2.
[ OBSERVE ( LEFT side, OVER ) / ( With no BOTTOM bracket ) ].

8. Gibb's free energy is eG; Hamiltonian ENTHALPY is E; Note,
Volt*Amp*sec is NEW SI GUESS icon + eV ..OR= - (m1*v1^2 / 2);
Kinetic *ionizational* energy is eK; And the LaGrangian is L.
Helmholtz FREE energy is (Gibb's free energy - Kinetic) = eF.

9. Corrected BOTTOM line of iTEM #2 ../ c^2 (NOT / c^4), duh.

10. Closing:
$ ^
*iNTRiNSiC ENERGY e=RESTmass*c^2=(mol part)*K*Volt*length/c^2.
$ brian a m stuckless
$ _ My GUESS iSS STANDARD
$ /\
$ __ _\/_ __
$ \_\/_/\_\/_/
$ /\_\/_/\ ("`-/")_.-'"``-._
$ _\/_/\_\/_ \. . `; -._ )-;-, `)
$ /_/\_\/_/\_\ \ / (v_,) _ )`-.\ ``-'
$ /\ - O - _ .- _..-_/ / ((.'
$ \/ / \ ((,.-' ((,/ By: Toe.!
$ By deeds you know them.!!
THAT IAM circumcising the FORESKiNs of your hearts.!!
:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'`
____ _ _ _ _
| _ \ | | ___ _ __ | | __ | | | |
| |_) | | | / _ \ | '_ \ | |/ / | | | |
My BiG | __/ | | | (_) | | | | | | _ |_| |_|
|_| |_| \___/ |_| |_| |_|\_\ (_) (_) (_)

:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_
IAM THAT IAM WHOLLY WHOLLY WHOLLY He and No more is more.


Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
absorbed mass of light ..MEASURED References.!! brian a m stuckless Physics - General Discussion 5 November 11th 05 01:01 PM
absorbed mass of light ..MEASURED References.!! brian a m stuckless The Theory of Relativity 0 November 11th 05 01:01 PM
TomGee? About the evidence for light's measured mass? Nick Physics - General Discussion 42 July 6th 05 09:36 PM
TomGee? About the evidence for light's measured mass? Y.Porat The Theory of Relativity 11 July 2nd 05 08:47 PM
TomGee? About the evidence for light's measured mass? Tom Roberts The Theory of Relativity 6 July 2nd 05 01:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Gourmet Chocolate Assortments - Debt Consolidation - vBulletin Hacks - Loans - MPAA