Sue... wrote:
Exactly what you stated. Composite particles have within their
*stucture* sufficient mechanism for attractive and repulsive forces
between neutrally charged particles.
http://www.fz-juelich.de/zam/docs/autoren2002/gibbon

one platitude, different theory

Autymn D. C. wrote:
Sue... wrote:
Exactly what you stated. Composite particles have within their
*stucture* sufficient mechanism for attractive and repulsive forces
between neutrally charged particles.
http://www.fz-juelich.de/zam/docs/autoren2002/gibbon

one platitude, different theory
platitude - platypus

As a Higgs mechanism it has all the specificity
that a photonic mechanism has. Is it a quantum
theory of gravity? Probably not... but the arguments
it makes against the utility of such a theory can be
helpful in the theorist's peripheral view.
("stay the course" is not an investigative technique
either ) ;-)

Many different physical ideas can describe
the same physical reality. Thus, classical
electrodynamics can be described by a field
view, or an action at a distance view, etc.
Originally, Maxwell filled space with idler wheels,
and Faraday with fields lines, but somehow the
Maxwell equations themselves are pristine and
independent of the elaboration of words attempting
a physical description. The only true physical
description is that describing the experimental
meaning of the quantities in the equation - or
better, the way the equations are to be used in
describing experimental observations. This being
the case perhaps the best way to proceed is to
try to guess equations, and disregard physical
models or descriptions.
http://nobelprize.org/physics/laurea...n-lecture.html

Sue...

There are NO arbitrary fundamental physical constants of NATURE, now.
SI GUESS iSS units are meter, kilogram, second, Ampere, Kelvin & Mol.

(PLANCK mass Mp)*lp = {mph}*ls = me*wls = hbar / c = m1*rA / nA

Moo Moo*loo hbar G*Mp^2 G*M1*m1
= -- -- -- = -- - -- = ---- = --- -- = -- -- --- -- --
4*pi*Roo 4*pi c c^2 nA*(n - 1)*v1^2

G*Mp*{mph} m1*rA (h + 2*hbar) k*{e}
= -- -- -- --- -- -- -- -- = -- -- = -- --- -- -- = -- --
4*(pi)^2*nA*(n - 1)*v1^2 nA Ra*c 2*pi

m1*(wavelength wl) m1*c me*wlc Planck's h eH*loo
= -- -- --- -- -- -- = -- - -- = --- -- = -- -- -- -- = -- - --
2*pi*nL 2*pi*fL 2*pi 2*pi*c 4*pi*c^2.

Maxwell's authentic equations applied ONLY between FLAT PLATEs.!!
But that doesn't matter for a point-ONLY on a WORLD-line in GR.!!
A WORLD-point in SPACE-time has NO iNSiDE, or OUTside, ANYways.!!
The SHORTEST GR-geodesic iN the SPACE ON the SURFACE of the POiNT
ON a WORLD-line in GR SPACE-time is NOT UNCLE AL's "other, LONGER
way round" GR-geodesic. Go go Google GROUP SEARCH My BiGGER bang.


Autymn D. C. wrote: brian a m stuckless wrote: Sue... wrote:
Ken S. Tucker wrote: Hi Sue, mostly agree with you...
Sue... wrote: Ken S. Tucker wrote: Ken S. Tucker
wrote: FrediFizzx wrote: "Jay R. Yablon"
wrote in message
...

Stop cascading or, if I ever find you, I'll beat your head in.

Greek YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo, mu*eps, in SI GUESS= Uo*Eo = 1 / c^2.
$ 3*VOLUME / AREA, per DURATiON = RADiAL velocity.!!
Delta VOLUME / surface AREA, per second = RADiAL DiSTANCE / 3*sec.
Unit TRiAKiSicosa VOLUME / (surf AREA*sec) is TiP-to-TiP / 6*sec.
Unit SPHERiCAL VOLUME / (surface AREA*sec) is, DiAMETER / 6*sec.
Unit CUBiCAL VOLUME / (surface AREA*second) = EDGEside / 6*sec.
GRAViTATiONAL impulse per VOLUME; iNERTiAL impulse, per AREA.

No, they're not. You need more subscripts. You should also read
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_salad_(mental_health).

The force between two charges and the force between
two masses represents no energy exchange.

Since "force" x DiSTANCE = "energy exchange" ("force" isn't "energy
exchange" EVEN if "viewed with a CAUTiON", MAY be WHY Sue said SO).

The GUESS iSS SERiAL index of OBSERVED scale-invariance, follows...


The NEW SI GUESS iSS STATiSTiCAL system of SCALE-invariance:

(h + 2*hbar) (pi + 1) (X + 2*Y)
-- -- -- -- = -- --- = -- -- -- = STATiSTiCAL *tensors* ;
h pi X

nL*(h + nA*hbar) nL*(2*pi + nA) nL*(X + nA*Y)
-- -- -- -- -- = -- -- --- -- = -- --- -- -- = nL*Ni.
h 2*pi X

Planck scale ; LOCAL scale ; Each WAY, and BEYOND.!!

So, NATURE doesn't CARE, if we have COHERENT SI STANDARDs.!!

Therefore, AS per WiTH the BOHR Atom, "AS above SO below".!!

G*{mph)*Mp 4*(pi)^2*{mph}*ls^3 2*pi*ls
-- ---- -- = -- -- -- - -- -- -- = me*(-- --- --)^2*wls .!!
(n - 1) ts^2 ts

brian a m stuckless

no caution -Aut. AS above SO below.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Sue... wrote:
The only true physical description is that describing
the experimental meaning of the quantities in the equation
- or better, the way the equations are to be used in
describing experimental observations. This being the case
perhaps the best way to proceed is to try to guess equations,
and disregard physical models or descriptions.
http://nobelprize.org/physics/laurea...n-lecture.html

Sue...
New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the
Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter
(gr-qc/0511050).

There are NO arbitrary fundamental physical constants of NATURE, now.
SI GUESS iSS units are meter, kilogram, second, Ampere, Kelvin & Mol.

(PLANCK mass Mp)*lp = {mph}*ls = me*wls = hbar / c = m1*rA / nA

Moo Moo*loo hbar G*Mp^2 G*M1*m1
= -- -- -- = -- - -- = ---- = --- -- = -- -- --- -- --
4*pi*Roo 4*pi c c^2 nA*(n - 1)*v1^2

G*Mp*{mph} m1*rA (h + 2*hbar) k*{e}
= -- -- -- --- -- -- -- -- = -- -- = -- --- -- -- = -- --
4*(pi)^2*nA*(n - 1)*v1^2 nA Ra*c 2*pi

m1*(wavelength wl) m1*c me*wlc Planck's h eH*loo
= -- -- --- -- -- -- = -- - -- = --- -- = -- -- -- -- = -- - --
2*pi*nL 2*pi*fL 2*pi 2*pi*c 4*pi*c^2.

Maxwell's authentic equations applied ONLY between FLAT PLATEs.!!
But that doesn't matter for a point-ONLY on a WORLD-line in GR.!!
A WORLD-point in SPACE-time has NO iNSiDE, or OUTside, ANYways.!!
The SHORTEST GR-geodesic iN the SPACE ON the SURFACE of the POiNT
ON a WORLD-line in GR SPACE-time is NOT UNCLE AL's "other, LONGER
way round" GR-geodesic. Go go Google GROUP SEARCH My BiGGER bang.


Autymn D. C. wrote: brian a m stuckless wrote: Sue... wrote:
Ken S. Tucker wrote: Hi Sue, mostly agree with you...
Sue... wrote: Ken S. Tucker wrote: Ken S. Tucker
wrote: FrediFizzx wrote: "Jay R. Yablon"
wrote in message
...

Stop cascading or, if I ever find you, I'll beat your head in.

Greek YAB-a-dab-a-Sue-doo, mu*eps, in SI GUESS= Uo*Eo = 1 / c^2.
$ 3*VOLUME / AREA, per DURATiON = RADiAL velocity.!!
Delta VOLUME / surface AREA, per second = RADiAL DiSTANCE / 3*sec.
Unit TRiAKiSicosa VOLUME / (surf AREA*sec) is TiP-to-TiP / 6*sec.
Unit SPHERiCAL VOLUME / (surface AREA*sec) is, DiAMETER / 6*sec.
Unit CUBiCAL VOLUME / (surface AREA*second) = EDGEside / 6*sec.
GRAViTATiONAL impulse per VOLUME; iNERTiAL impulse, per AREA.

No, they're not. You need more subscripts. You should also read
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_salad_(mental_health).

The force between two charges and the force between
two masses represents no energy exchange.

Since "force" x DiSTANCE = "energy exchange" ("force" isn't "energy
exchange" EVEN if "viewed with a CAUTiON", MAY be WHY Sue said SO).

The GUESS iSS SERiAL index of OBSERVED scale-invariance, follows...


The NEW SI GUESS iSS STATiSTiCAL system of SCALE-invariance:

(h + 2*hbar) (pi + 1) (X + 2*Y)
-- -- -- -- = -- --- = -- -- -- = STATiSTiCAL *tensors* ;
h pi X

nL*(h + nA*hbar) nL*(2*pi + nA) nL*(X + nA*Y)
-- -- -- -- -- = -- -- --- -- = -- --- -- -- = nL*Ni.
h 2*pi X

Planck scale ; LOCAL scale ; Each WAY, and BEYOND.!!

So, NATURE doesn't CARE, if we have COHERENT SI STANDARDs.!!

Therefore, AS per WiTH the BOHR Atom, "AS above SO below".!!

G*{mph)*Mp 4*(pi)^2*{mph}*ls^3 2*pi*ls
-- ---- -- = -- -- -- - -- -- -- = me*(-- - --)^2*wls .!!
(n - 1) ts^2 ts

ADDENDUM:
G*{mph)*Mp 4*(pi)^2*{mph}*ls^3 4*(pi)^2*Mp*lp*ls^2
-- ---- -- = -- -- --- --- -- -- = -- --- --- -- -- -- .!!
(n - 1) ts^2 ts^2

G*{mph)*Mp 4*(pi)^2*{mph}*ls*c^2 4*(pi)^2*Mp*lp*c^2
-- ---- -- = -- -- --- --- -- -- = -- --- --- -- -- -- .!!
(n - 1) 1 1

Note, (n -1) ..in the event mass m1, at rA, has a CAViTY.!!

brian a m stuckless

no caution -Aut. AS above SO below.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Sue... wrote:
The only true physical description is that describing
the experimental meaning of the quantities in the equation
- or better, the way the equations are to be used in
describing experimental observations. This being the case
perhaps the best way to proceed is to try to guess equations,
and disregard physical models or descriptions.
http://nobelprize.org/physics/laurea...n-lecture.html

Sue...
New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the
Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter
(gr-qc/0511050). ; Sue to try GUESS equations.