"St.M" wrote in message
oups.com...

Bill Hobba wrote:
"Sue..." wrote in message
oups.com...

Bill Hobba wrote:
"Arthur Knight" wrote in message
news How simple
The universe and every single or individual body and phenomena in
it,
however large or small is made up of only Matter its Motion and
space.

Since modern physics suggests otherwise this simplicity is of no
relevance.
For example QM has cast doubts on objects having an actual motion.
Indeed! And magic squares offer nearly conclusive evidence of that.

Sue...

Learn the basics of science - QM has never been falsified.

Bill


Billy boy !!! when will you grow up son?

About the same time as cowards like yourself post under their own name and
not hide behind anonymity. But then again what can one say about someone
whose comment about Ken Tucker is 'Well, Ken has some fine concept of
gravity'.

Bill




Bill

Nothing else what so ever. Forget all the fancy names postulations
theories etc. Just "define" these three basic absolutes correctly
and
you
have the best chance of solving mysteries of what ever kind. I find
many
of the so called experts in science do not know this and even if so
knowing of them, still cannot define them correctly or hold to
them.
Thus
they continually contradict themselves going around in continuing
circles
They just cannot hold to the true nature of these three basic
absolutes.
"Why" simple because they cannot step back and see that some form or
degree of illusion is misleading them. It is only primary school
stuff
but
once in university their brains become addled and mislead by
educated
parrots or professors reading for text books that have never been
seriously challenged. The universe in all it phenomena is absolute,
like
it or not, i.e. time space, motion etc in their most basic nature,
and
relativity is based on an illusion. or at best is a secondary
concept.
Yes
we live in a world of secondaries, relatives and illusions and need
to
accept them for convience sake but that does not excuse us for
saying
they
are basic or absolute, because they are just not. Albert you were
not
the
genius they made you out to be anymore than the layperson I am. Good
luck
to you, you had your day for the convience to the establishment. now
it
is
someone else's turn, right or wrong to be glorified with Knight
hoods
and
Noble prizes. Thank you Albert for your relatively being right and
wrong
at the same time. It is hardly what I would expect of a kinder
garden
child. You have given me something laugh at every time it think of
it.
Arthur P.s. Bill Hobba if you read this, please no more snip snip
unless
it is to your defective reasoning. Grow up. Art

On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 00:25:22 +0000, Bill Hobba wrote:


"Themistocles" wrote in message
oups.com...

Bill Hobba wrote:
"Arthur Knight" wrote in message
news How simple
The universe and every single or individual body and phenomena in it,
however large or small is made up of only Matter its Motion and space.

Since modern physics suggests otherwise this simplicity is of no
relevance.
For example QM has cast doubts on objects having an actual motion.

how is that, the motion in QM is not random?

Motion - meaning move - meaning having a velocity - is not an observable in
QM. And even if it was an observable the Kochen-Specker theorem says

if its not about motion then its useless
are you sure you understand what QM is all
about?

observable can not be both value definite and non contextual. However I
have no doubt such is beyond you because you are simply a troll, possibly
another incarnation of the dyslexic troll returned to annoy us.

Bill



Bill

Nothing else what so ever. Forget all the fancy names postulations
theories etc. Just "define" these three basic absolutes correctly and
you
have the best chance of solving mysteries of what ever kind. I find
many
of the so called experts in science do not know this and even if so
knowing of them, still cannot define them correctly or hold to them.
Thus
they continually contradict themselves going around in continuing
circles
They just cannot hold to the true nature of these three basic
absolutes.
"Why" simple because they cannot step back and see that some form or
degree of illusion is misleading them. It is only primary school stuff
but
once in university their brains become addled and mislead by educated
parrots or professors reading for text books that have never been
seriously challenged. The universe in all it phenomena is absolute,
like
it or not, i.e. time space, motion etc in their most basic nature, and
relativity is based on an illusion. or at best is a secondary concept.
Yes
we live in a world of secondaries, relatives and illusions and need to
accept them for convience sake but that does not excuse us for saying
they
are basic or absolute, because they are just not. Albert you were not
the
genius they made you out to be anymore than the layperson I am. Good
luck
to you, you had your day for the convience to the establishment. now it
is
someone else's turn, right or wrong to be glorified with Knight hoods
and
Noble prizes. Thank you Albert for your relatively being right and
wrong
at the same time. It is hardly what I would expect of a kinder garden
child. You have given me something laugh at every time it think of it.
Arthur P.s. Bill Hobba if you read this, please no more snip snip
unless
it is to your defective reasoning. Grow up. Art