A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old November 10th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Dirk Van de moortel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,355
Default SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.


"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message ...
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:26:24 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message ...
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:38:16 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:



Don't skip any of these exercises.
Work for it.

answer my question or go away.


Answering your question requires knowing that you understand
the concept of closing speed. It is crystal clear that you don't
understand it. That is why I gave you these exercises. When you
make them, you will understand and then you can move on. If
you refuse to make them, that means that you enjoy your state
of not-understanding and that you don't want to move on.
Meanwhile anyone who tries to answer your question, is
wasting his and your time.

The exercises are on my first reply in this thread.
You know where to find them.


You are a pathetic waste of time and space.

It should be obvious to any normal person that my question relates to the
different closing speeds of the pulses and the two observers.


Yes indeed, and your text was a tragical mix of closing speeds
and ordinary speeds, demonstrating that you have no idea when
which is what. That is why I gave you the exercises. You know
where to find them. But I think you don't have the guts to make
them...

Dirk Vdm


Ads
  #12  
Old November 11th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Black Knight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 345
Default SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.


"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message
...
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 11:26:24 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 22:38:16 GMT, "Dirk Van de moortel"
wrote:



Don't skip any of these exercises.
Work for it.

answer my question or go away.


Answering your question requires knowing that you understand
the concept of closing speed. It is crystal clear that you don't
understand it. That is why I gave you these exercises. When you
make them, you will understand and then you can move on. If
you refuse to make them, that means that you enjoy your state
of not-understanding and that you don't want to move on.
Meanwhile anyone who tries to answer your question, is
wasting his and your time.

The exercises are on my first reply in this thread.
You know where to find them.


You are a pathetic waste of time and space.

It should be obvious to any normal person that my question relates to the
different closing speeds of the pulses and the two observers.

The question asks why they should both calculate the same value for c,
using
Maxwell, when the closing speeds are clearly not the same.


Dirk Vdm



HW.

Message rating several casks.
Androcles.


  #13  
Old November 11th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Black Knight
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 345
Default SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.


"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message
...
On 10 Nov 2005 01:27:21 -0800, "Eric Gisse" wrote:


Henri Wilson wrote:

[snip]


answer my question or go away.


He asked the questions before you did, ****wit.

I'll give you a hint: Think about the nature of the solution to the
linear wave equation. Does the speed of the wave depend on anything or
is it, in fact, constant?


speed wrt what, idiot?



HW.

Message rating several casks.
Androcles.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sci.Physics in a nutshell. Jeff_Relf Physics - General Discussion 15 June 22nd 05 04:28 AM
Sci.Physics in a nutshell. Jeff_Relf Physics - General Discussion 0 May 1st 05 07:01 PM
The Universe in a nutshell Rick Physics - General Discussion 13 October 6th 04 03:59 AM
Universe in a Nutshell Series Jack Sarfatti Physics - General Discussion 0 July 4th 03 01:34 AM
Universe in a Nutshell Series Jack Sarfatti The Theory of Relativity 0 July 4th 03 01:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Credit Cards - Mortgages - 0% Balance Transfers - Gaia Online Cheats - Mortgages