A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Is GR and QM "Coulomb blind" to satisfy PoR?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 6th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Sue...
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,404
Default Is GR and QM "Coulomb blind" to satisfy PoR?



The Lorenz gauge and the Coulomb gauge are in
some sense the extremes in behavior of
the scalar potential. In the one the effects of
a source point propagate with the speed c; in the
other the propagation is at infinite speed. But
there is no reason for a restriction to such limiting
cases. We define the velocity gauge ( v-gauge
for short and actually a class of gauges) to be one in
which the speed of propagation for the scalar
potential is v, an arbitrary speed relative to c. The
velocity gauge has been discussed in classical
electrodynamics by Yang, Brown and
Crothers, and Drury, and in quantum
electrodynamics by Baxter,18 with the names " -
Lorentz gauge," and "velocity gauge."
Brown and Crothers are most explicit; Drury
discusses the equations but does not solve them.
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0204034

Sue...

Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GR-c goes "instantaneously" from 0 to c ..in NO time.!! But jOE, Tom Roberts says LiGHT "STOPs slowing down".!! [ Does SPEED c "STOP slowing down" instantaneously.? ] [ Does VELOCiTY c "STOP slowing down" .. brian a m stuckless Physics - General Discussion 2 November 16th 05 03:55 PM
There are *THEORETiCAL models*, *MATHEMATiCAL models* and *REAL* models. There are, actually, NO *PHYSiCAL* theories, what-so-ever, you dimwit.!! And, the "theory" is NOT the "mathematics" (i.e. "arithmetic"), dooOP.!! P brian a m stuckless Physics - General Discussion 3 November 13th 05 12:02 PM
(Don Van) "Mass"(enhoven) vs. (Dougie) "Weight" vs. (Craig M"uni)ts" The Original Archie Leach Physics - General Discussion 16 April 16th 04 02:05 AM
(Don Van) "Mass"(enhoven) vs. (Dougie) "Weight" vs. (Craig M"uni)ts" The Original Archie Leach Physics - General Discussion 0 April 11th 04 05:47 PM
"I c!" said the blind man dlzc@aol.com \(formerly\) The Theory of Relativity 0 September 2nd 03 03:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Web Advertising - Debt Help - Cheat Codes - Mobile Phones - Remortgages