A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The BEST atomic clock is SiMPLY a *mega-frequency COUNTER*.!! And, even "the BEST atomic clocks" CANNOT BE SYNCRONiZED, on any WORLD-line in SPACE-time (..NEiTHER with each other, NOR with any COMMONLY conceived THiRD clock simulating R



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 2nd 05 posted to alt.bible.prophecy,alt.bible,sci.econ,sci.physics.relativity
Flowerchild
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default The BEST atomic clock is SiMPLY a *mega-frequency COUNTER*.!! And, even "the BEST atomic clocks" CANNOT BE SYNCRONiZED, on any WORLD-line in SPACE-time (..NEiTHER with each other, NOR with any COMMONLY conceived THiRD clock simulating R


brian a m stuckless wrote:
The BEST atomic clock is SiMPLY a *mega-frequency COUNTER*.!!
And, even "the BEST atomic clocks" CANNOT BE SYNCRONiZED, on
any WORLD-line in SPACE-time (..NEiTHER with each other, NOR
with any COMMONLY conceived THiRD clock simulating REAL time.

Tom Roberts wrote: kk wrote: T Roberts wrote:
Please re-read what I wrote. You are free to use ANY clock
synchronization method you prefer.


By Ph Tivity definition:
Clocks on a world-line in space-time CANNOT be syncronized.!!

Note also that "proof" does not apply to physics.


"Proof" DOEs NOT APPLY, to definitions (i.e. NOMENCLATURE).!!

Physics is not mathematics. What we have are THEORIES,


"Physics" is about words (i.e. NOMENCLATURE) and equations.!!
(NOT SLOWLY SEPARATED clocks, on a world-line in space-time.)

and for slow clocks transport, --
-- that is, by slow enough transport you can make the error
caused by the transport to be as small as you like.


That old TRiCK is even BAD MATHEMATiCs besides BAD PHYSiCs.!!
WHAT is ALL this NONSENSE.?!! This is APPROXiMATiON THEORY.!!
WHAT is ALL this NONSENSE.?!! This Ph.Tivity "SLOW LiMiT".?!!
("SLOWLY" separated clocks, on a world-line in space-time.?!)

In practice, speeds achieved by walking while pushing the
clock on a cart induce errors FAR below the intrinsic
accuracy of the best atomic clocks. --


insert ..see top of PAGE.!!

So your claim above is irrelevant. I repeat: this is physics
-- errorbars are important; errors significantly smaller
than other errorbars are irrelevant.


THAT is "SHOP-mechanics" ..NOT "physics", Tom.!! MECHANiCs.!!
You, ADAMANTLY, totally, CONFUSE GR with applied MECHANiCs.!!

Seriously, Git OUT OF TOWN ..you *DAFFY* Ph.Tivity BUFFooN.!!
brian a m stuckless

Tom Roberts

OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.


And I have heard the best way to kill a disease, a virus cell, is with
radio frequencys...sound and light...not medicine!
Royal Raymond Rife told me.

Ads
  #2  
Old November 2nd 05 posted to alt.bible.prophecy,alt.bible,sci.econ,sci.physics.relativity
Flowerchild
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default The BEST atomic clock is SiMPLY a *mega-frequency COUNTER*.!! And, even "the BEST atomic clocks" CANNOT BE SYNCRONiZED, on any WORLD-line in SPACE-time (..NEiTHER with each other, NOR with any COMMONLY conceived THiRD clock simulating R


Flowerchild wrote:
brian a m stuckless wrote:
The BEST atomic clock is SiMPLY a *mega-frequency COUNTER*.!!
And, even "the BEST atomic clocks" CANNOT BE SYNCRONiZED, on
any WORLD-line in SPACE-time (..NEiTHER with each other, NOR
with any COMMONLY conceived THiRD clock simulating REAL time.

Tom Roberts wrote: kk wrote: T Roberts wrote:
Please re-read what I wrote. You are free to use ANY clock
synchronization method you prefer.


By Ph Tivity definition:
Clocks on a world-line in space-time CANNOT be syncronized.!!

Note also that "proof" does not apply to physics.


"Proof" DOEs NOT APPLY, to definitions (i.e. NOMENCLATURE).!!

Physics is not mathematics. What we have are THEORIES,


"Physics" is about words (i.e. NOMENCLATURE) and equations.!!
(NOT SLOWLY SEPARATED clocks, on a world-line in space-time.)

and for slow clocks transport, --
-- that is, by slow enough transport you can make the error
caused by the transport to be as small as you like.


That old TRiCK is even BAD MATHEMATiCs besides BAD PHYSiCs.!!
WHAT is ALL this NONSENSE.?!! This is APPROXiMATiON THEORY.!!
WHAT is ALL this NONSENSE.?!! This Ph.Tivity "SLOW LiMiT".?!!
("SLOWLY" separated clocks, on a world-line in space-time.?!)

In practice, speeds achieved by walking while pushing the
clock on a cart induce errors FAR below the intrinsic
accuracy of the best atomic clocks. --


insert ..see top of PAGE.!!

So your claim above is irrelevant. I repeat: this is physics
-- errorbars are important; errors significantly smaller
than other errorbars are irrelevant.


THAT is "SHOP-mechanics" ..NOT "physics", Tom.!! MECHANiCs.!!
You, ADAMANTLY, totally, CONFUSE GR with applied MECHANiCs.!!

Seriously, Git OUT OF TOWN ..you *DAFFY* Ph.Tivity BUFFooN.!!
brian a m stuckless

Tom Roberts

OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.


And I have heard the best way to kill a disease, a virus cell, is with
radio frequencys...sound and light...not medicine!
Royal Raymond Rife told me.


Ps...How did the walls of Jericho fall?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Clocks With "Atomic Time" Synchronization: How ? Robert11 Physics - General Discussion 2 December 11th 05 09:20 PM
atomic giga-frequency counters in real time brian a m stuckless Physics - General Discussion 3 November 3rd 05 11:00 AM
The BEST atomic clock is SiMPLY a *mega-frequency COUNTER*.!! And, even "the BEST atomic clocks" CANNOT BE SYNCRONiZED, on any WORLD-line in SPACE-time (..NEiTHER with each other, NOR with any COMMONLY conceived THiRD clock simulating R donstockbauer@hotmail.com Physics - General Discussion 0 November 2nd 05 11:03 AM
The BEST atomic clock is SiMPLY a *mega-frequency COUNTER*.!! And, even "the BEST atomic clocks" CANNOT BE SYNCRONiZED, on any WORLD-line in SPACE-time (..NEiTHER with each other, NOR with any COMMONLY conceived THiRD clock simulating REAL brian a m stuckless Physics - General Discussion 0 November 2nd 05 08:17 AM
The BEST atomic clock is SiMPLY a *mega-frequency COUNTER*.!! And, even "the BEST atomic clocks" CANNOT BE SYNCRONiZED, on any WORLD-line in SPACE-time (..NEiTHER with each other, NOR with any COMMONLY conceived THiRD clock simulating REAL brian a m stuckless The Theory of Relativity 0 November 2nd 05 08:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Mobile Phone - Credit Report - Debt Consolidation - Compare - MPAA