|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: again, einsteins, idiocy, twin |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
October 21st 05
posted to sci.physics.relativity
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein's Twin Idiocy Again
bz wrote: "Sue..." wrote in ups.com: bz wrote: "Sue..." wrote in oups.com: .... No...*Everybody* agress that both twins will see each and every frame of a commonly viewed motion picture, and will see each and every orbit of Jupiters moons, regardless of their travels. That doesn't make much of a case for any difference in age. But the number of heart beats You have a URL to the theory's chapter on biology ?  )sure ;} http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...+space+fl igh Scholarly articles for relativity physiology of interstellar space flight 31 stAIAAIASMUSAWASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and ... - by Vienna - 0 citations In Gen HARD SCIENCE-FICTION - by In - 0 citations Annual Report 2000 - by Center - 1 citations GAWD! The sci-fi gang don't write about it. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...hs&btnG=Search Results 1 - 10 of about 509,000 for relativity myths. Try that. )Sue... t Sue... will NOT be the same, even assuming that they each spend the same amount of 'proper time' exercising. -- bz please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an infinite set. remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap -- bz please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an infinite set. remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap 
|
| Ads |
|
#23
October 21st 05
posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.skeptic,sci.philosophy.tech
|
|||
|
|||
|
Einstein's Twin Idiocy Again
Pentcho Valev wrote: snip In a normal science, further analysis of this setup would amount to reductio ad absurdum. As C and T meet for the second time, C must prove slower than T, in accordance with the standard time dilation analysis, but at the same time C must run faster than T precisely by a factor of gamma because Einstein said so in 1905. In relativity absurdity is called paradox: instead of being rejected, the theory becomes sensational and brings prestige and money to both initiated and zombies. Umm, you do not account for the non-interil time when teh directionof the rocket is changed. Also you two clocks on the rocket is a new variation. You will need to explain teh "synchronization" procedure between the two clocks on the one rocket ship. Simultaneous and snychronized are difficult concepts under special relativity. Unless you are at the same point (or more accurately "event") or in the same interial frame the concepts are meaningless.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Einstein's Twin Idiocy Again | Joseki | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | October 21st 05 08:24 PM |
| Einstein's Twin Idiocy Again | Androcles | Physics - General Discussion | 9 | October 21st 05 06:27 PM |
| Einstein's Twin Idiocy Again | Eli Botkin | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | October 21st 05 06:38 AM |
| Einstein's Twin Idiocy Again | rotchm@gmail.com | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | October 20th 05 11:57 PM |
| Einstein's Twin Idiocy Again | donstockbauer@hotmail.com | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | October 20th 05 02:11 PM |
Linear Mode
