A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Bielawski agrees with Androcles for a change.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 7th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Androcles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,713
Default Bielawski agrees with Androcles for a change.

"JanPB" wrote in message
oups.com...

| It
| would be *much* simpler and better not to plug in the numbers, it
| obscures everything:

That's ok, take the half (½) out, it's a number and obscures everything.
I've told you before I object to the half. Use (t1-t0)/(t2-t0) instead.

Androcles.

Ads
  #2  
Old October 7th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Dirk Van de moortel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,355
Default Bielawski agrees with Androcles for a change.


"Androcles" Androcles@ MyPlace.org wrote in message k...
"JanPB" wrote in message
oups.com...

| It
| would be *much* simpler and better not to plug in the numbers, it
| obscures everything:

That's ok, take the half (½) out, it's a number and obscures everything.
I've told you before I object to the half. Use (t1-t0)/(t2-t0) instead.


That's okay, you could take half of your brain and
no one would even see the difference:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...les/FALSE.html

Dirk Vdm


  #3  
Old October 8th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
PD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,366
Default Bielawski agrees with Androcles for a change.


Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"Androcles" Androcles@ MyPlace.org wrote in message . uk...
"JanPB" wrote in message
oups.com...

| It
| would be *much* simpler and better not to plug in the numbers, it
| obscures everything:

That's ok, take the half (½) out, it's a number and obscures everything.
I've told you before I object to the half. Use (t1-t0)/(t2-t0) instead.


That's okay, you could take half of your brain and
no one would even see the difference:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...les/FALSE.html

Dirk Vdm


That fumble was truly spectacular. What was amazing was his sticking to
his guns on the arithmetic error. He apparently can't say "oops"
without vomiting uncontrollably.

PD

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
the law agrees that the agreement doesn't belong in the group of laws dedanoe@yahoo.com Physics - General Discussion 0 November 3rd 05 01:35 PM
Nobel Prize 2005 "Agrees" With Aligned Colliding Plane Waves (CPW) OsherD Physics - General Discussion 0 October 6th 05 07:40 PM
Acceleration of Universe As Acceleration of Probable Correlation 6: Probability Parameter Change as Topological Change OsherD Physics - General Discussion 0 September 24th 05 08:27 PM
recently discovered binary pulsar -- agrees with Einstein in at leastfour different ways Sam Wormley Physics - General Discussion 6 March 5th 05 06:00 PM
Disproving E=MC2: At least someone agrees with me! Time Traveller The Theory of Relativity 9 February 2nd 04 06:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Mortgages - Credit Cards - Loans - Personal Loans - Loans