Sue... wrote:
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
Sue... wrote:
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
...
No guff Sue, that was super ref. (I read it 3 times).

AE was able to unify the Law of Conservation of Mass
and the Law of Conservation of energy with E=mc2.

((I once went to a tutor session with a rather
large intimidating equation that was wonderfully
sophisticated. The Prof pondered it for a few
minutes, got out his book and pointed to E=mc2.
That was Prof W.W. Sawyer, who is quite famous
now living in England.
That was embarassing! That's why I embrace Eq.(4),
a unified field theory for simple clarity.))

Another very fundamental one is Planck's E=hf,
which is free of differentials and integrals.

Then GR's E=(G/c^4)*L, your favorite :-).

If
magnetism is to electromagnetism
as
London forces are to gravity
then
that relation might have some problems.

Hmmm... what does this suggest?
http://electron9.phys.utk.edu/optics...er_cooling.htm
;-)

Hey that's cool (pun intended:-). As I recall,
the LASER works by "stimulating Radiation to
emission". I think the process of emission can
remove energy from the system (atom in that case)
so it get's cooler.
So if one photon goes into a system but two photons
come out, then the system looses the energy equivalent
of the stimulated photon.
Is that what you think?
Ken

Interestingly...
A pretty good mechanical analog exist:
The vortex tube, also known as the Ranque-Hilsch
vortex tube, is a heat pump with no moving parts.
Pressurized gas is injected into a specially designed
chamber. The chamber's internal shape, combined with
the pressure, accelerates the gas to a high rate of
rotation (over 1,000,000 rpm). The gas is split into
two streams, one giving kinetic energy to the other,
and resulting in separate flows of hot and cold gases.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex_tube

Sue...

Well everybody needs to make a $

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator

A real free man doesn't suck the taxpayer to
do research, he pays for it if it's right!

SSC == $11 billion to make more particles.

I'm ready to take a collection, what PP's
out there will give a rat's ass? none.

There are two types of theoreticians, those
who pay their own way, and those that are in
the way. If you're bright enough to be a
theoretician, you're bright enough to pay
your own way.
If you can't pay you're own way then get
the **** out of the way, you don't qualify.

That's the occam razor.

Thus governmentally institutionalized
theoreticians suckin off tax-payers are
parasites giving real theoreticians a
bad reputation. Like Shatner said,
"get the **** out of your parents basement".

"Get a real job"

I could name at least a dozen people who
post to this group who fall into the above
catagory.

Best to you..
Ken