I have put another version of my Pioneer 10 Dual Space solution on my
website. It appears there are two opinions as to whether P10 evinced a
redshift or blue shift so I have added on another solution. Please
take a look at paper #4. It has a lot of interesting stuff.
No one has been able to solve this and my solution is new physics of
which this is a mere example

John Polasek
http://www.dualspace.net

"John C. Polasek" wrote in message
news
I have put another version of my Pioneer 10 Dual Space solution on my
website. It appears there are two opinions as to whether P10 evinced a
redshift or blue shift so I have added on another solution. Please
take a look at paper #4. It has a lot of interesting stuff.
No one has been able to solve this and my solution is new physics of
which this is a mere example

John Polasek
http://www.dualspace.net

You write:
"
The question of whether a blue shift of red shift was deduced has a major
bearing on the theory that supports it. Blue shift is the widely accepted
interpretation, and interpretation it is, because it is inference from the
raw fundamental data that is a recording of input and output frequencies.
According to [4] the Doppler difference is reckoned as Dn = n - n0, with n
being the received frequency, always with negative results. "It is .negative
for a spacecraft approaching the station (blue shift), just the opposite of
the usual convention"(!). Likewise in [3] we find "Without using apparent
acceleration, CHASMP shows a steady frequency drift of
about -6x10-9Hz/s.this equates to a clock acceleration,-at,
of -2.8x10-18s/s2. It is clear, definite and cannot be removed without
either the added acceleration ap or the inclusion in the data itself of a
frequency drift, i.e. a "clock acceleration" at".

Both instances strongly indicate that the received frequency is lower,
implying a craft accelerating away, rather than toward the Sun. Since Dn =
?*t, then ? must be a negative number. Yet the consensus is that the
vehicles appear to be approaching the Sun.
"

How can it be so unclear if it's a redshift or a blueshift? Didn't the
engineers of NASA comment on that?

Harald

Data is plural.

In sci.physics.relativity, Autymn D. C.

wrote
on 16 Oct 2005 09:19:12 -0700
.com:
Data is plural.


One would hope so, and reproducible at will by other experimenters. :-)

--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.