Hello to all:

I wanted to let you know about my new paper just posted at
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0508257, titled Magnetic Monopoles and Duality
Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics.

This paper summarizes the main direction of my research over these past
eight months.

The abstract is as follows:

It is shown how to break the symmetry of a Lagrangian with duality symmetry
between electric and magnetic monopoles, so that at low energy, electric
monopole interactions continue to be observed but magnetic monopole
interactions become very highly suppressed to the point of effectively
vanishing. The "zero-charge" problem of source-free electrodynamics is
solved by requiring invariance under continuous, local, duality
transformations, while local duality symmetry combined with local U(1)_EM
gauge symmetry leads naturally and surprisingly to an SU(2)_D duality gauge
group.

I would be interested in any feedback, public or private, that you may wish
to provide.

Sincerely,

Jay R. Yablon
_____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email:

"Jay R. Yablon" wrote in message
...
| Hello to all:
|
| I wanted to let you know about my new paper just posted at
| http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0508257, titled Magnetic Monopoles and
Duality
| Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics.
|
| This paper summarizes the main direction of my research over these
past
| eight months.
|
| The abstract is as follows:
|
| It is shown how to break the symmetry of a Lagrangian with duality
symmetry
| between electric and magnetic monopoles, so that at low energy,
electric
| monopole interactions continue to be observed but magnetic monopole
| interactions become very highly suppressed to the point of effectively
| vanishing. The "zero-charge" problem of source-free electrodynamics is
| solved by requiring invariance under continuous, local, duality
| transformations, while local duality symmetry combined with local
U(1)_EM
| gauge symmetry leads naturally and surprisingly to an SU(2)_D duality
gauge
| group.
|
| I would be interested in any feedback, public or private, that you may
wish
| to provide.
|
| Sincerely,
|
| Jay R. Yablon
| _____________________________
| Jay R. Yablon
| Email:

Jay, what you wrote on the sp group in response to Dr. Photon was so
good I am going to just quote it here.

""Dr Photon" wrote in message
ups.com...
Jay R. Yablon wrote:
[read my paper]

So if a Yablonon did exist at 2.35 TeV, what's the best way to go
about
looking for it? Would it be straightforward? What signature/lifetime
would it have? As it is so massive, would it have an incredibly short
lifetime and so be v. hard to distinguish from noise?


Hi there Dr. Photon!

Let me approach this from two directions:

First, the final footnote on page 34 points out that if one takes the
main
results and applies them to weak and strong interactions (imposing a
Dirac
Quantization Condition (DQC) for *their* couplings), that the vector
bosons
which mediate magnetic monopole interactions for those interactions are
predicted to be around 436 GeV (strong, at pi/4 complexion) and about
1.3
TeV (weak, after adjusting running couplings for TeV range). There are
three mass events which seem to be causing a buzz out of the Tevatron:
1206
GeV, 1364 GeV, and 436 GeV. I suspect that the 1364 GeV and the 436 GeV
events may be the respective mediators of analogous magnetic monopole
interactions for weak and strong interactions, and so would look very,
very
closely at these events. The weak mediator, I think, would also show us
for
the first time the SU(2)R (right-handed) weak interactions which some
suspect exist at high energies, see next paragraph. (The reason these
masses are *smaller* than the 2.35 TeV mass from my paper, is because
they
are based on the inverses, via DQC, of weak and strong couplings which
are
larger than the EM coupling.)

Second, let me preview the next paper I will prepare (after a bit of a
break
following eight months working toward this paper), which picks up from
where
this one left off, to explore the SU(2) duality group that was a
"surprise"
in section 7. If one starts with SU(2)_D and looks closely at the
magnetic
monopoles themselves as fermions, it turns out that these are *not*
wholly
independent of electric charges, and that chirality is the key to tying
these together (the electroweak analogy therefore goes even deeper). In
fact, the next "surprise" we will come upon is that the magnetic
monopoles
are actually the left-handed chiral projections of the electric charges.
More to the point, in the "unbroken" Lagrangian the "electric" charges
are
all right-handed and the magnetic charges are all left-handed, and this
type
of chiral separation before symmetry breaking applies to the Lagrangian
for
*any* interaction, not just U(1))_em. But, when we add their currents
as in
(5.11), J^u' = J^u + P^u, the observed electric charge currents J^u'
turn
out to be chiral symmetric, as is observed. So, the brief answer to
your
question about "signature" (the full answer will need about a 20 page
paper), is to take equation (5.14) and look at what it would tell us if
J^u'
is taken to be chiral symmetric and P^u is taken to be all left-handed.
In
this case, since the complexion alpha is very small (sin^2 alpha = 2.131
x
10^-4, see (6.7)), we would find that the observed magnetic monopole
current
P^u' couples with a very heavy weighting toward left-handedness. (BTW,
it
could be exactly the opposite -- equally heavy right-handed weighting --
the
theory does not (yet) tell us which way to make the L, R assignments).
So,
look for a magnetic monopole interaction that couples to *known*
electric
charges (rather than some new independent fermions) with a very heavy
(but
not 100% like weak interactions) weighting based on the square of the
fine
structure coupling (accounting for Dirac's 1/2 factor).

So, if someone were to say "I found some weird vector boson near 2.3 or
2.4
TeV that couples the electrons or the quarks with a very heavy left (or
right) handed bias on the order of 10^4," I would say "Bingo!"

The even deeper upshot, is that in the *unbroken* Lagrangian, left- and
right-handed chiral projections are separate, and then they become
combined
through equations like (5.11). This will help us to understand why the
weak
interactions at low energies are strictly left handed (we are dealing
with a
symmetry unbroken by a (5.11)-type condition). And, remember, left and
right handed Fermions, as two-component Dirac spinors, are massless. It
is
only when we combine them to form a four-component spinor, that they
gain
mass. Just like adding a third polarization using Goldstone scalars
gives
mass to vector bosons. So, there is a very deep mass connection that
emerges here as well.

Now maybe I don't have to write the next paper. But, I suspect people
will
want to see the details."

What do you think of Dr. Photon's Yablonon? LOL!

FrediFizzx

http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/qu...uum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/qu...cuum_charge.ps

YES, you may be in right track !!!

If I remember right I wrote (in Usenet sci-groups) in year 1995 about
six light particles (bosons ?) related to eight magnetic
monopoles (fermions ?) which were in one H-M's drawing.
All these particles were colored with color electricity color in
this H-M's drawing.

Good luck for your in hunting these particles,

Hannu


Jay R. Yablon wrote:
Hello to all:

I wanted to let you know about my new paper just posted at
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0508257, titled Magnetic Monopoles and Duality
Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics.

This paper summarizes the main direction of my research over these past
eight months.

The abstract is as follows:

It is shown how to break the symmetry of a Lagrangian with duality symmetry
between electric and magnetic monopoles, so that at low energy, electric
monopole interactions continue to be observed but magnetic monopole
interactions become very highly suppressed to the point of effectively
vanishing. The "zero-charge" problem of source-free electrodynamics is
solved by requiring invariance under continuous, local, duality
transformations, while local duality symmetry combined with local U(1)_EM
gauge symmetry leads naturally and surprisingly to an SU(2)_D duality gauge
group.

I would be interested in any feedback, public or private, that you may wish
to provide.

Sincerely,

Jay R. Yablon
_____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email:

wrote:
YES, you may be in right track !!!

If I remember right I wrote (in Usenet sci-groups) in year 1995 about
six light particles (bosons ?) related to eight magnetic
monopoles (fermions ?) which were in one H-M's drawing.
All these particles were colored with color electricity color in
this H-M's drawing.

Good luck for your in hunting these particles,

Hannu


My interpretations about H-M's drawings:

I must add that eight magnetic monopoles are possible four "right" and
four "wrong" neutrinos (these are in second H-M's drawing) when they
are "color electrity" binded. This is indicated in my opinion in
H-M's photon drawing (photon in contracting part of the Universe).
In third H-M's drawing about the "space potato" particle there
is "mirror" structure between seven "right" neutrinos and seven
"wrong" neutrinos and three "hour glass forms" and in this form there
is two "colored" "small" "right" neutrinos in center of "hour glass
form" (possible these two "small" "right" neutrinos forms "light"
particles (bosons ?)(these are "lightcones" in respect to "color
electricity" signals). These "light" particles are "messages" between
"color electricity" colored magnetic monopoles.

If I remember right in my Readme.all file there was mentioned
that there exist two types of "color electricity" in neutrinos
which originates from the contracting part of the Universe.

"Right" neutrinos are in contracting part of the Universe
and "wrong" neutrinos are in expanding part of the Universe
(expanding part is our familiar visible side).

Good luck for hunting new interactions and particles,

Hannu


Jay R. Yablon wrote:
Hello to all:

I wanted to let you know about my new paper just posted at
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0508257, titled Magnetic Monopoles and Duality
Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics.

This paper summarizes the main direction of my research over these past
eight months.

The abstract is as follows:

It is shown how to break the symmetry of a Lagrangian with duality symmetry
between electric and magnetic monopoles, so that at low energy, electric
monopole interactions continue to be observed but magnetic monopole
interactions become very highly suppressed to the point of effectively
vanishing. The "zero-charge" problem of source-free electrodynamics is
solved by requiring invariance under continuous, local, duality
transformations, while local duality symmetry combined with local U(1)_EM
gauge symmetry leads naturally and surprisingly to an SU(2)_D duality gauge
group.

I would be interested in any feedback, public or private, that you may wish
to provide.

Sincerely,

Jay R. Yablon
_____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email:

wrote:
wrote:
YES, you may be in right track !!!

If I remember right I wrote (in Usenet sci-groups) in year 1995 about
six light particles (bosons ?) related to eight magnetic
monopoles (fermions ?) which were in one H-M's drawing.
All these particles were colored with color electricity color in
this H-M's drawing.

Good luck for your in hunting these particles,

Hannu


My interpretations about H-M's drawings:

I must add that eight magnetic monopoles are possible four "right" and
four "wrong" neutrinos (these are in second H-M's drawing) when they
are "color electrity" binded. This is indicated in my opinion in
H-M's photon drawing (photon in contracting part of the Universe).
In third H-M's drawing about the "space potato" particle there
is "mirror" structure between seven "right" neutrinos and seven
"wrong" neutrinos and three "hour glass forms" and in this form there
is two "colored" "small" "right" neutrinos in center of "hour glass
form" (possible these two "small" "right" neutrinos forms "light"
particles (bosons ?)(these are "lightcones" in respect to "color
electricity" signals). These "light" particles are "messages" between
"color electricity" colored magnetic monopoles.

If I remember right in my Readme.all file there was mentioned
that there exist two types of "color electricity" in neutrinos
which originates from the contracting part of the Universe.

"Right" neutrinos are in contracting part of the Universe
and "wrong" neutrinos are in expanding part of the Universe
(expanding part is our familiar visible side).

Good luck for hunting new interactions and particles,

Hannu


I did not remember to mention that in space-potato particle
there is always three neutrinos are groupped together when binded
with this new color electricity interaction (possibly neutrinos
are color electricity colored magnetic monopoles when binded).

Above the mirror structure (total number of wrong neutrinos
is seven above the mirror) there are four different types of
wrong neutrinos and below mirror structure (total number of
right neutrinos is seven below the mirror) there are four
different types of right neutrinos.

Small right neurino couples are in centers of hour glass forms
in the mirror (hour glass forms are light cones in respect to
color electricity signal). If these are light particles between
magnetic monopoles they are possible not observable in contraction
part of the Universe !!!

For example fourth type of wrong neutrino is different than three
other types.

Please take a look H-M's drawings and my explanations about them.



Hannu


Jay R. Yablon wrote:
Hello to all:

I wanted to let you know about my new paper just posted at
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0508257, titled Magnetic Monopoles and Duality
Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics.

This paper summarizes the main direction of my research over these past
eight months.

The abstract is as follows:

It is shown how to break the symmetry of a Lagrangian with duality symmetry
between electric and magnetic monopoles, so that at low energy, electric
monopole interactions continue to be observed but magnetic monopole
interactions become very highly suppressed to the point of effectively
vanishing. The "zero-charge" problem of source-free electrodynamics is
solved by requiring invariance under continuous, local, duality
transformations, while local duality symmetry combined with local U(1)_EM
gauge symmetry leads naturally and surprisingly to an SU(2)_D duality gauge
group.

I would be interested in any feedback, public or private, that you may wish
to provide.

Sincerely,

Jay R. Yablon
_____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email:

wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
YES, you may be in right track !!!

If I remember right I wrote (in Usenet sci-groups) in year 1995 about
six light particles (bosons ?) related to eight magnetic
monopoles (fermions ?) which were in one H-M's drawing.
All these particles were colored with color electricity color in
this H-M's drawing.

Good luck for your in hunting these particles,

Hannu


My interpretations about H-M's drawings:

I must add that eight magnetic monopoles are possible four "right" and
four "wrong" neutrinos (these are in second H-M's drawing) when they
are "color electrity" binded. This is indicated in my opinion in
H-M's photon drawing (photon in contracting part of the Universe).
In third H-M's drawing about the "space potato" particle there
is "mirror" structure between seven "right" neutrinos and seven
"wrong" neutrinos and three "hour glass forms" and in this form there
is two "colored" "small" "right" neutrinos in center of "hour glass
form" (possible these two "small" "right" neutrinos forms "light"
particles (bosons ?)(these are "lightcones" in respect to "color
electricity" signals). These "light" particles are "messages" between
"color electricity" colored magnetic monopoles.

If I remember right in my Readme.all file there was mentioned
that there exist two types of "color electricity" in neutrinos
which originates from the contracting part of the Universe.

"Right" neutrinos are in contracting part of the Universe
and "wrong" neutrinos are in expanding part of the Universe
(expanding part is our familiar visible side).

Good luck for hunting new interactions and particles,

Hannu


I did not remember to mention that in space-potato particle
there is always three neutrinos are groupped together when binded
with this new color electricity interaction (possibly neutrinos
are color electricity colored magnetic monopoles when binded).

Above the mirror structure (total number of wrong neutrinos
is seven above the mirror) there are four different types of
wrong neutrinos and below mirror structure (total number of
right neutrinos is seven below the mirror) there are four
different types of right neutrinos.

Small right neurino couples are in centers of hour glass forms
in the mirror (hour glass forms are light cones in respect to
color electricity signal). If these are light particles between
magnetic monopoles they are possible not observable in contraction
part of the Universe !!!

Sorry about typing error. Correct sentence should be:

If these are light particles between
magnetic monopoles they are possible not observable in expanding
part of the Universe !!!



For example fourth type of wrong neutrino is different than three
other types.

Please take a look H-M's drawings and my explanations about them.



Hannu


Jay R. Yablon wrote:
Hello to all:

I wanted to let you know about my new paper just posted at
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0508257, titled Magnetic Monopoles and Duality
Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics.

This paper summarizes the main direction of my research over these past
eight months.

The abstract is as follows:

It is shown how to break the symmetry of a Lagrangian with duality symmetry
between electric and magnetic monopoles, so that at low energy, electric
monopole interactions continue to be observed but magnetic monopole
interactions become very highly suppressed to the point of effectively
vanishing. The "zero-charge" problem of source-free electrodynamics is
solved by requiring invariance under continuous, local, duality
transformations, while local duality symmetry combined with local U(1)_EM
gauge symmetry leads naturally and surprisingly to an SU(2)_D duality gauge
group.

I would be interested in any feedback, public or private, that you may wish
to provide.

Sincerely,

Jay R. Yablon
_____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email: