Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to draw your attention to our new paper

" On light aberration "

*Abstract*
We will study astronomical aberration of light from the view of
classical and relativistic formalisms and reveal the following salient
feature of aberration in classical formalism: the models of moving
observer and stationary source and of moving source and stationary
observer are non-identical. As opposite to this, the relativistic
formalism has based its modelling on the identity of these models,
which causes full phenomenological discrepancy of relativistic approach
to the real description of aberration.

We will show that Airy obtained a negative result in his experiment
with the telescope filled with water because of features of telescopic
system, which he did not account. If getting these masking effects
over, we can suggest a method to measure exactly the absolute velocity
and direction of the Earth motion based on the feature of aberration
predicted by classical formalism. Additionally, we will give one more
scheme to register the velocity of Earth. This technique will allow to
measure, just as the technique based on aberration, the first-order
values of smallness in v/c.
________

As aberration is one of crux problems of physics and astronomy, we are
hoping, it will be important for many of you to understand that in
reality this effect is much more complicated. This can considerably
improve your understanding of aberration problem. Enjoy reading the
full text he

http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_2/conte...tml#aberration

Best to you all,
Sergey B. Karavashkin

Head Laboratory SELF
187 apt., 38 bldg.
Prospect Gagarina
Kharkov 61140
Ukraine

Phone: +38 (057) 73706624
e-mail: ,
http://www.angelfire.com/la3/SELFlab/index.html

Sergey Karavashkin wrote:
Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to draw your attention to our new paper

" On light aberration "

*Abstract*
We will study astronomical aberration of light from the view of
classical and relativistic formalisms and reveal the following salient
feature of aberration in classical formalism: the models of moving
observer and stationary source and of moving source and stationary
observer are non-identical. As opposite to this, the relativistic
formalism has based its modelling on the identity of these models,
which causes full phenomenological discrepancy of relativistic approach
to the real description of aberration.

We will show that Airy obtained a negative result in his experiment
with the telescope filled with water because of features of telescopic
system, which he did not account. If getting these masking effects
over, we can suggest a method to measure exactly the absolute velocity
and direction of the Earth motion based on the feature of aberration
predicted by classical formalism. Additionally, we will give one more
scheme to register the velocity of Earth. This technique will allow to
measure, just as the technique based on aberration, the first-order
values of smallness in v/c.
________

As aberration is one of crux problems of physics and astronomy, we are
hoping, it will be important for many of you to understand that in
reality this effect is much more complicated. This can considerably
improve your understanding of aberration problem. Enjoy reading the
full text he

http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_2/conte...tml#aberration

Best to you all,
Sergey B. Karavashkin

Head Laboratory SELF
187 apt., 38 bldg.
Prospect Gagarina
Kharkov 61140
Ukraine

Phone: +38 (057) 73706624
e-mail: ,
http://www.angelfire.com/la3/SELFlab/index.html

Can you post this on the internet in .pdf format to make it easier to
download and read?

Vern

wrote in message oups.com...
Sergey Karavashkin wrote:
Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to draw your attention to our new paper

" On light aberration "

*Abstract*
We will study astronomical aberration of light from the view of
classical and relativistic formalisms and reveal the following salient
feature of aberration in classical formalism: the models of moving
observer and stationary source and of moving source and stationary
observer are non-identical. As opposite to this, the relativistic
formalism has based its modelling on the identity of these models,
which causes full phenomenological discrepancy of relativistic approach
to the real description of aberration.

We will show that Airy obtained a negative result in his experiment
with the telescope filled with water because of features of telescopic
system, which he did not account. If getting these masking effects
over, we can suggest a method to measure exactly the absolute velocity
and direction of the Earth motion based on the feature of aberration
predicted by classical formalism. Additionally, we will give one more
scheme to register the velocity of Earth. This technique will allow to
measure, just as the technique based on aberration, the first-order
values of smallness in v/c.
________

As aberration is one of crux problems of physics and astronomy, we are
hoping, it will be important for many of you to understand that in
reality this effect is much more complicated. This can considerably
improve your understanding of aberration problem. Enjoy reading the
full text he

http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_2/conte...tml#aberration

Best to you all,
Sergey B. Karavashkin

Head Laboratory SELF
187 apt., 38 bldg.
Prospect Gagarina
Kharkov 61140
Ukraine

Phone: +38 (057) 73706624
e-mail: ,
http://www.angelfire.com/la3/SELFlab/index.html

Can you post this on the internet in .pdf format to make it easier to
download and read?

Careful, before you waste too much time on this, be aware
that this person has a function with a curl(grad) that is not zero.
See thread
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...b73c5fd98f8a36
and
http://groups-beta.google.com/groups...rgey+grad+curl
and elsewhere...

Dirk Vdm

wrote:

Can you post this on the internet in .pdf format to make it easier to
download and read?

Vern

Dear Vern, sorry for delay. PDF file is too large to download (about 8
Mb). Please take doc.zip (checked for viruses) he

http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_2/aberration/aberENG.zip

Looking forward to hear your opinion,

Sergey

"Sergey Karavashkin" wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:

Can you post this on the internet in .pdf format to make it easier to
download and read?

Vern

Dear Vern, sorry for delay. PDF file is too large to download (about 8
Mb). Please take doc.zip (checked for viruses) he

http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_2/aberration/aberENG.zip

Looking forward to hear your opinion,

Sergey

Thanks, it looks very interesting and I'll read it, eventhough there likely
is an error somewhere.
But you won't hear my opinion except if I find the time to study it and
reach some kind of conclusion.

Best regards,
Harald

Harry wrote:
"Sergey Karavashkin" wrote in message
oups.com...

wrote:

Can you post this on the internet in .pdf format to make it easier to
download and read?

Vern

Dear Vern, sorry for delay. PDF file is too large to download (about 8
Mb). Please take doc.zip (checked for viruses) he

http://selftrans.narod.ru/v5_2/aberration/aberENG.zip

Looking forward to hear your opinion,

Sergey

Thanks, it looks very interesting and I'll read it, eventhough there likely
is an error somewhere.
But you won't hear my opinion except if I find the time to study it and
reach some kind of conclusion.

Best regards,
Harald

Dear Harry, I am pleased seeing you on my thread.

As to mistake, I take your challenge. Colleagues on another forum
already have ploughed up our paper in trying to find the mistake, but
had to admit, there is not. So you can be busy on. ;-)

To the point, in the early this year we published a paper describing
the transverse Doppler effect from the view of classical formalism.
From this material you can well see the cause of your negative
experimental results which I predicted (if you remember). Should then
you and your boss be not greedy and self-confident, now you would be
not smacking lips, you would be co-authors of positive experimental
results in this trend of acoustics. ;-)

Best to you,

Sergey