Sam Wormley wrote:
wrote:

Time is the only thing that is NOT malleable.


Spoken like a true crank, potter
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22To...Awww.crank.net

Perhaps you'll retort with something personal about me, eh Potter?

As can be seen, Sam Wormley's primary reference
continues to be the web site of a computer programmer,
who took some data processing classes
at a third rate California college.

It is also interesting to observe
that Sam tries to sell stuff from a Web site
that he tries to con prospective customers.
into thinking is an EDU site.

I suggest that Sam's choice of references,
his persistent use of personal attacks,
his dishonest marketing methods,
his pretension to be knowledgeable in GR and GPS,
and his reluctance to engage in
rational, intelligent, moral discussions of scientific issues,
reveals more about him, than I ever could.

--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com

wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:

wrote:


Time is the only thing that is NOT malleable.


Spoken like a true crank, potter
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22To...Awww.crank.net

Perhaps you'll retort with something personal about me, eh Potter?


As can be seen, Sam Wormley's primary reference
continues to be the web site of a computer programmer,
who took some data processing classes
at a third rate California college.

It is also interesting to observe
that Sam tries to sell stuff from a Web site
that he tries to con prospective customers.
into thinking is an EDU site.

I'll give you 90% Potter.



I suggest that Sam's choice of references,
his persistent use of personal attacks,
his dishonest marketing methods,
his pretension to be knowledgeable in GR and GPS,
and his reluctance to engage in
rational, intelligent, moral discussions of scientific issues,
reveals more about him, than I ever could.

--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com

On 18 Aug 2005 18:34:52 -0700, "Perspicacious"
Gave us:

There was another word in the 16th century that stopped
discussion and paralyzed thinking. The word was "heretic."


Heretical idiot! Hahahahahaha....

On 19 Aug 2005 07:30:46 -0700, Gave us:

As can be seen, Sam Wormley's primary reference

Snip...

Shoulda figured... Yet another pussy potter post.

"GeekBoy" wrote in message
news:1124433409.a5ea2bc7e1f7033ded6025cc9a19396a@t eranews...

"Perspicacious" wrote in message
oups.com...

snip

...an indistinguishable sameness everywhere,

That one's a keeper!

ROFLMAO


Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA

Perspicacious:
There was another word in the 16th century that stopped
discussion and paralyzed thinking. The word was "heretic."

False comparison: you're an idiot, not a heretic.


You really do need to recognize your mindless rage and
honestly confront your medieval mind. If you can attain
that, then learn math next and recognize your obsession
with deceit. Try to reform. Aim to be honest. Becoming
marginally civilized will improve your sour disposition.

Time is homogeneous.

What's your point? That should be obvious to anyone who
has ever derived the lorentz transforms by considering
infinitesimal displacements.

It possesses an indistinguishable
sameness everywhere, point by point, across all inertial
frames of reference. There are no fatal flaws in
http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf

If you think a complete lack of physical motivation and zero
pedagogical value is not a fatal flaw, you're still in the denial
phase.

Bilge wrote:
Perspicacious:
Time is homogeneous.

What's your point? That should be obvious to anyone who
has ever derived the lorentz transforms by considering
infinitesimal displacements.

Bill Hobba disagrees with you. Go instruct him.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...3c93b018914d4c
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...f7a4a7d21bb362

It possesses an indistinguishable sameness everywhere,
point by point, across all inertial frames of reference.
There are no fatal flaws in
http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf

Perspicacious, the idiot and fabrication engineer:
Bilge wrote:
Perspicacious:
Time is homogeneous.

What's your point? That should be obvious to anyone who
has ever derived the lorentz transforms by considering
infinitesimal displacements.

Bill Hobba disagrees with you. Go instruct him.

I'm instructing _you_, since you are the one who posted this
crap. If bill disagrees with me, I'm sure he can say so without
your help, which based on previous experience, means a deliberate
misrepresentation of what was posted or an outright fabrication
on your part. You have a reputation for being dishonest, in
addition to being a self-aggrandizing half-wit.

Bilge wrote:
Perspicacious:
Time is homogeneous.

What's your point? That should be obvious to anyone who
has ever derived the lorentz transforms by considering
infinitesimal displacements.

Bill Hobba disagrees with you. Go instruct him.

I'm instructing _you_,

I don't need your instruction. Bill Hobba does. He doesn't believe in
the homogeneity of time, as these two links prove:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...3c93b018914d4c
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...f7a4a7d21bb362

If bill disagrees with me, I'm sure he can say so

That assumption is completely unwarranted. Hoppa is a coward just like
you and many ignominious ignoramuses around here. You all can't get
together and agree on a specific error in the math or logic of
http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf yet you all
whine incessantly about nonspecifics.
When there has been even the slightest hint of unanimity, experience
proves that Shubert just goes to sci.math for resolution of the dispute
resulting in the fanatical trolls of sci.physics.relativity getting
their butts kicked by competent mathematicians.
http://www.everythingimportant.org/v...hp?p=3466#3466

based on previous experience, means a deliberate
misrepresentation of what was posted or an outright fabrication
on your part.

So you say, but you never post links or evidence. I keep posting
links to my evidence yet you never address the facts presented
and you keep deleting my links in replies.

You have a reputation for being dishonest

In other words, I have a huge army of nitwit crusaders who follow
me constantly, trying to besmirch my reputation with vicious lies
and serpent-like venom, but never once have they been able to
refute even one of my amazing claims with honesty and truth.

http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf