Art Deco wrote:
Nth Complexity wrote:

Archie Leach wrote:
Well, of course, (Nth
Complexity), this is just the sort of blinkered philistine pig
ignorance I've come to expect from you non-creative garbage:

Art Deco wrote:
Seconded. Note that the format definition of acceleration is the first
derivative of speed with respect to time:

Almost right! Hahahahahahahahahaha ....


That is the unversally established (at least for any respectable
working physicist, and for any respectable "alternative"
free-energy/Tesla junkie dissident physicist this side of Richard
Hoaxland) definition of acceleration.

As co-morons like to say:
Unsupported assertion!

You're the one claiming otherwise, so it would seem that the burden of
proof is on YOU to justify your own conception of acceleration.

Hi Archie. Here's a correct definition of acceleration:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/acca.html

Thank you for seconding my nomination and defending Art Deco's error.
Keep up the good work, and Have A Nice Day.

-- Nth Complexity --

What an idiot.

Hi, Art Deco! Do you still stand by the accuracy of your definition eh?

-- Nth Complexity --
"The teaching of science and mathematics must be purged of its
authoritarian and elitist characteristics, and the content of these
subjects enriched by incorporating the insights of the feminist,
queer, multiculturalist and ecological critiques." -- A.D.S.





--
Sent by 2 from yahoo subdomain of com
This is a spam protected message. Please answer with reference header.
Posted via http://www.usenet-replayer.com

Nth Complexity wrote:

Art Deco wrote:
Nth Complexity wrote:

Archie Leach wrote:
Well, of course, (Nth
Complexity), this is just the sort of blinkered philistine pig
ignorance I've come to expect from you non-creative garbage:

Art Deco wrote:
Seconded. Note that the format definition of acceleration is the first
derivative of speed with respect to time:

Almost right! Hahahahahahahahahaha ....


That is the unversally established (at least for any respectable
working physicist, and for any respectable "alternative"
free-energy/Tesla junkie dissident physicist this side of Richard
Hoaxland) definition of acceleration.

As co-morons like to say:
Unsupported assertion!

You're the one claiming otherwise, so it would seem that the burden of
proof is on YOU to justify your own conception of acceleration.

Hi Archie. Here's a correct definition of acceleration:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/acca.html

Thank you for seconding my nomination and defending Art Deco's error.
Keep up the good work, and Have A Nice Day.

-- Nth Complexity --

What an idiot.

Hi, Art Deco! Do you still stand by the accuracy of your definition eh?

-- Nth Complexity --
"The teaching of science and mathematics must be purged of its
authoritarian and elitist characteristics, and the content of these
subjects enriched by incorporating the insights of the feminist,
queer, multiculturalist and ecological critiques." -- A.D.S.

What an idiot.

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler

"Don't be too envious. Yes, I have got it all. I am rich, I
have a good education, and I am rather good looking .. so
where does that leave you?
C."
-- Charles D. "Chuckweasel" Bohne polishes his ego a bit

"That's what you expect from people who think that the
cyberworld isn't "RL"."
-- Dr. David Tholen, Psychic Astrologer

"The original human being was a female hermaphrodite with
both male and female genitalia."
-- Alexa Cameron, Kook of the Year 2004