Archie Leach wrote:
I'll grant that there is no timeless acceleration (insofar as figuring
out acceleration requires at least an infinitesimal time interval to
determine the change in motion of an object from one instant to the
next), but I will contend that acceleration is not a motion in and of
itself but the instantaneous (and/or cumulative)

[rate of, I assume you intend]

change in an object's
motion.

If you accept that then I will rescind my seconding of your nomination
for the VVF (not that that really means all that much).

Of course that's right. But go ahead and second me if you want eh!

-- Nth Complexity --
"The teaching of science and mathematics must be purged of its
authoritarian and elitist characteristics, and the content of these
subjects enriched by incorporating the insights of the feminist,
queer, multiculturalist and ecological critiques." -- A.D.S.





--
Sent by 2 from yahoo part from com
This is a spam protected message. Please answer with reference header.
Posted via http://www.usenet-replayer.com