![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: emergent, gravity, inertia, origin |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://qedcorp.com/APS/zpf2005.pdf
My key new discovery is I. Einstein-Cartan tetrad = 1 + Lpd(Phase of Vacuum Condensate) That should be compared with II. v(IT) = (h/m)Grad(Phase of BIT Pilot Wave) I is the ELASTIC-PLASTIC 4D Super Solid that "fractures" to make curvature and maybe torsion as topological defect densities (H. Kleinert). I is for micro-quantum and macro-quantum liquids. These are PHASE JUMPS or SINGULARITIES corresponding to multiply-connected vacuum manifolds of non-bounding cycles of various p and closed non-exact Cartan forms. That is non-trivial co-homology and homology as well as nonlocal holonomies (anholonomy). The quantum of circulation h/m in a Super Liquid is replaced by the quantum of length Lp in the Super Solid or "World Crystal" (H. Kleinert). If the Vacuum Manifold is for SU(3) QCD then we have all kinds of topological defects e.g. Pioneer Anomaly. We probably have to use spontaneous breakdown of symmetry in all of U(1)xSU(2)xSU(3) or its GUT generalizations like SO(10)? All of space-time physics is in the BRANCH CUTS of the set of Goldstone Phases. On Aug 4, 2005, at 9:22 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: Weak force theory SU(2)xU(1) has a vacuum condensate, so does strong force theory SU(3). Note the U(1) above is hypercharge. Which condensate should be plugged into Einstein-Cartan tetrad = 1 + Lpd(Phase of Vacuum Condensate) ? Note, my original vacuum condensate is independent of the SM condensates above. I simply had a zero mass conformal Dirac Sea of virtual electron-positron pairs with the other condensates as small corrections. Basic theorem is that any net attractive interaction between fermions will cause a collapse to a ODLRO state spontaneously breaking symmetry. George Chapline seems to disagree with that? Since Einstein's GR claims to be the origin of inertia and since the QCD SU(3), says Frank Wilczek, provides most of inertia as confined kinetic energy with weak SU(2) Yukawa couplings only giving the small inertias of the trapped quarks inside the "bag", it would seem that we must use the chiral SU(3) condensate? See also Lenny Susskind's "technicolor". On Aug 3, 2005, at 3:00 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: So most of the mass seems to come from an SU(3) QCD condensate not the weak SU(2) condensate. Hmmm for SU(2) On Aug 2, 2005, at 12:19 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: I am introducing a new paradigm here. 1. The Cartan forms provide an objective local way to do spacetime physics at least "classically" independent of all observer POVs (both LIF & LNIF). The key result is ds^2 = guvdx^udx^v = eI(x)e^I(x) where e(x) = eI(x)dx^I is the objective local Einstein-Cartan "gravity field" here in invariant form for both LIF and LNIF observers. That is the fundamental objective local scalar ds^2 of Einstein's 1915 GR is simply the scalar product of the local tetrad with itself that is an absolute local frame invariant under all transformations in the theory. This is basically a consequence of the equivalence principle. My NEW ORIGINAL EQUATION is simply e(x) = 1 + (hG*/c^3)^1/2d(Goldstone Phase of Higgs VEV) John Baez in his "Gravity, Gauge, Knots" book explains how d(Phase) need not be an exact 1-form from non-trivial topology in the relevant form manifold, i.e. Phase singularities e.g. "Dirac string". I call this "Flux without flux". This new equation says No gravity if the quantum h is zero. No gravity if the speed of light is infinite. Even when G =/= 0. B = (hG*/c^3)^1/2d(Goldstone Phase of Higgs VEV) is also the compensating gauge potential from locally gauging global T4 to local Diff(4). Both local gauging and spontaneous broken vacuum symmetry come together in the emergence of Einstein's gravity field from macro-quantum phase coherence. 2. Space-time physics is local only because "classical" is an illusion that needs to be replaced by "macro-quantum" or "ODLRO" or "VEV" (Vacuum Expectation Value) from "spontaneous broken symmetry" or more generally "More is different" theory of bottom - up emergent order. 3. Obviously BOTH Bottom - Up + Top - Down & IT FROM BIT + BIT FROM IT supplementing John Archibald Wheeler's "Law without law" 4. Space-time physics is local because the macro-quantum Higgs VEV is local. This is a well-understood feature of Oliver Penrose's "ODLRO" of reduced micro-quantum density matrices (correlation functions). 5. The arrow of time, i.e. early universe post-Big Bang has low entropy that increases as our local universe's space expands in the multiverse of parallel other worlds, is because the formation of the Higgs VEV in the inflation from the false vacuum lowers the entropy as is well known in superfluid physics. 6. Extra space-dimensions bring the unification scale of the forces down to low energy (G* ~ 10^40G) and enable Wheeler's "mass without mass" micro-geon explanation of the hadronic resonance Regge trajectories in the context of David Bohm's IT "hidden variable" theory with BIT pilot waves. It is significant that in the standard model only the charge-neutral component of the Higgs VEV doublet gives the inertia to the leptons and quarks in the "Yukawa coupling". This doublet is a basic representation of weak SU(2) and it allows the Hedgehog topological defect in the Higgs vacuum manifold seen in the NASA Pioneer anomaly. The SM Higgs mechanism is essentially a lumped-parameter version of the micro-geon model. |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Sarfatti Lectures On The Origin of Gravity and Inertia 1 & 2 | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | August 27th 05 06:09 PM |
| More on the Higgs-Goldstone origin of gravity and inertia | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | August 23rd 05 06:40 AM |
| Origin of Inertia in Emergent Gravity | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | August 4th 05 07:15 PM |
| origin of inertia | John C. Polasek | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | March 14th 05 11:13 PM |
| origin of inertia | aleksandar.vukelja@gmail.com | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | March 14th 05 01:31 PM |