![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: flux, strings, without |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Even before the Dirac string, you have the field outside an infinite
thin solenoid carrying a current. Even though B = CurlA = 0 outside the solenoid, A is not = 0 and the closed loop integral of A on a loop outside the solenoid must equal the enclosed magnetic flux. That this is real, is seen in the fringe shift of electron patterns in Bohm-Aharonov experiments. In Cartan form language A is a 1-form (automatically Diff(4) invariant in curved space-time) A = Audx^u B is part of a 2-form (F includes the electric field as well). F = Fuvdx^u/\dx^v Nonrigorously F = dA d is the exterior topological derivative of Cartan To make F a Diff(4) local frame invariant (both LIF & LNIF) replace d by D = d + C/\ the exterior covariant derivative relative to a given 1-form connection C (more on that elsewhere) OK if A = d@ @ is a 0-form scalar phase Therefore, outside the solenoid F = d^2@ = 0 everywhere except for a kind of Dirac string PHASE SINGULARITY or BRANCH CUT where @ jumps by N2pi, where N is the number of Flux-without-flux quanta. This is true if there is some kind of order parameter Psi(x) = |Psi(x)|e^i@(x) that must be single-valued when x is taken around a closed loop L in space-time. For the solenoid let's stay inside a space-like slice for now to keep it simple. What we have is generalized Stoke's theorem p|&(p+1) = dp|p+1 p| is a p-form & is the boundary operator dual to the exterior derivative operator d Now in the case of the long thin solenoid above, the Loop L outside the solenoid is not a boundary! That is, it is a non-bounding cycle with a non-trivial cohomology group H1 = (All Loops)/(Bounding Loops) (Bounding Loops) is a normal subgroup of (All Loops) This is dual to the homology group H^1 = (All Closed Forms)/(Exact Forms) Essentially a closed form A defined as dA = 0 that is not exact is an exact form A = d@ + a PHASE SINGULARITY If you take integral over the finite annulus with closed loops L & L' you will get zero, because L + L' is a boundary of the enclosed finite annulus. But the inner loop L' integral is equal to the enclosed flux since L' is by itself a bounding cycle of its interior where the flux really "is". For all practical purposes however, you can throw away the real flux inside L' and replace the imaginary string by a REAL string where PHASE jumps! You can also require that Psi = 0 somewhere inside L' and this makes a multiply-connected manifold for the order parameters Psi! i.e. imaginary string PHASE SINGULARITY (JUMP) + REAL FLUX WITH FLUX is EQUIVALENT TO REAL string PHASE SINGULARITY (JUMP) + IMAGINARY FLUX WITHOUT FLUX The latter picture is Wheeler-Feynman (Hoyle-Narlikar) replacement of ALL Gauge Force Fields by STRINGS of ORDER PARAMETER PHASE JUMPS - in effect the force fields are redundant non-dynamical degrees of freedom - Schwinger "source" theory? On Aug 3, 2005, at 9:34 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: Note that if one does not like "VEV" (Vacuum Expectation Value) use "ODLRO parameter", since the ODLRO parameter in thermal equilibrium closed systems, for example, does not vanish up until some critical Tc and Hc. e.g. kTc ~ binding energy of pair in ODLRO condensate. When T 0 there is some random "normal fluid". Here the "normal fluid" is the residual random micro-quantum zpf dark energy. However The Free Lunch Ansatz is Total Global Energy over Hubble Bubble = Total Energy of Gravity (effective B = Lpd(GoldstoneargODLRO) field) + Total Energy of |Higgs ODLRO| + Total Energy of "Matter" + Total Zero Point Energy (summed over all fields) = 0 For example the D^uDu(ODLRO) gradient term in the Diff(4) Landau-Ginzburg Euler-Lagrange equation always appears with a compensating B = Lpd(argODLRO) contribution. That is, in the Action inhomogeneous terms like (D^uODLRO*)(DuODLRO) are compensated by terms in B and its derivatives giving Einstein's Ricci scalar R for example. The important physics of the B-fields are in the "Dirac string" GOLDSTONE PHASE SINGULARITIES inside the VACUUM MANIFOLD G/H(unbroken) or LANDSCAPE of possible ODLRO configurations - not all of which need be homogeneous in space-time with constant homogeneous Goldstone phase. On Aug 3, 2005, at 8:33 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote: George Chapline objects to my new equation e(x) = 1 + Lpd(Goldstone-Higgs VEV Phase) for the Einstein-Cartan tetrad 1-form e(x) where Einstein's ds^2 = |e(x)|^2 = eI(x)e^I(x) e^I(x) = eu^I(x)dx^u d is the exterior derivative on the 0-form Goldstone-Higgs VEV phase saying that the vacuum has constant phase. However the VEV does not vanish above this homogeneous unstable GLOBALLY FLAT FALSE VACUUM WITHOUT GRAVITY (pre-inflation). Note that e(x) = 1 + Lpd(Goldstone-Higgs VEV Phase) B = Lpd(Goldstone-Higgs VEV Phase) is in analogy with Bohm's v(IT) = (h/m)Grad(Phase of QUANTUM BIT PILOT WAVE) where quantum of circulation h/m is replaced by the quantum of distortion Lp. Of course, George's example is an oversimplification. For example, take a Type II superconductor with a lattice of magnetic flux vortices as the temperature approaches absolute zero. The vortices do not go away and the phase is definitely not identically zero. Note - inside the region where |VEV| =/= 0 you can replace the magnetic flux by "Dirac strings" of argVEV phase singularities (e.g. Abrikosov's Nobel Lecture Rev Mod Phys for a picture and the math). I call this "Flux without flux" in accord with Wheeler-Feynman eliminating EM field completely as independent dynamical fields (see also Hoyle-Narlikar). Note that d(VEV Phase) creates gravity with total NEGATIVE ENERGY to COMPENSATE the any positive energy from it in the total action S(Gravity, VEV), i.e. Universe is a Free Lunch. This happens even though local gravity energy density stress tensor is zero when /\zpf = 0. Here is where we need NONLOCALITY OF THE TOTAL NEGATIVE GRAVITY ENERGY that compensates any TOTAL POSITIVE NON-GRAVITY ENERGY. Note that if one does not like "VEV" (Vacuum Expectation Value) use "ODLRO parameter", since the ODLRO parameter in thermal equilibrium closed systems, for example, does not vanish up to Tc and Hc. Furthermore, our local universe, if we are stuck on a BRANE for example in extra dimensions is an OPEN NON-EQUILIBRIUM SYSTEM since at least GRAVITY LEAKS OFF the 3D BRANE! |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Topology of the Vacuum 2 "Flux without flux" | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | October 27th 05 08:23 PM |
| Flux without flux: Topos prior to Geometrodynamics | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | April 11th 05 04:06 AM |
| Flux without flux: Topos prior to Geometrodynamics | Jack Sarfatti | The Theory of Relativity | 1 | April 11th 05 04:06 AM |
| Flux without flux? Discovery or Delusion? | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | April 10th 05 05:28 PM |
| Flux without flux? Discovery or Delusion? | Jack Sarfatti | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | April 10th 05 05:28 PM |