The ignominious ignoramus Uncle Al is unable to conceptualize
experiential time with moving rulers. So he just pompously
condemns what he is obviously unable to grasp or refute.

If there are any sane individuals on this newsgroup who love
civility and are knowledgeable enough to intelligently affirm
or refute the arguments contained in the 2005.07.30 edition
of http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf
please speak up.

Perspicacious wrote:
The ignominious ignoramus Uncle Al is unable to conceptualize
experiential time with moving rulers. So he just pompously
condemns what he is obviously unable to grasp or refute.

If there are any sane individuals on this newsgroup who love
civility and are knowledgeable enough to intelligently affirm
or refute the arguments contained in the 2005.07.30 edition
of http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf
please speak up.



I've asked Shubert to show us his derivation for time dilation for say
a GPS satellite with observed velocity of 3.9 km/s using both SR and
his theory, but he can't do it, because his "alternative" is just smoke
and dung. It has also been pointed out to Eugene that this theory is
contradicted by empirical results of observation and experiment, in that
No object can travel faster than the speed of light.

Mr. Wormley,

You are one of the mindless, insane trolls that I'm trying to avoid.
http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf
says nothing about superluminality.

Sam doesn't know the difference between has, may, might, and can and
could.