A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: ,

Nuke Model



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 2nd 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Josef Matz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 650
Default Nuke Model


Von: "Bill Hobba"
Betreff: Wrong physics
Datum: Sonntag, 31. Juli 2005 02:12


"Josef Matz" wrote in message
...

"Bill Hobba" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...

"Josef Matz" wrote in message
...
General Relativity is fully wrong
SR is partly wrong - no inhomogeneous elektromagnic waves
- no Cosmology
- no Gravity as observed
- wrong dogma: Photons have no mass.
true Photons have mass m = h v / c²
- no velocities greater c
- only real valued fields

Electrodynamics partly wrong
- no inhomogeneous waves or if accepted

that
they exist
no spin theory and no energy theory
- wrong formulas for waves passing

through

You might like to acquaint yourself with Schwingers Classical
Electrodynamics where your supposed no spin or energy is fully

developed.

Rest of rubbish is same vein mercifully snipped.

Bill




So if Schwingers Reflection - Transmission Formulas are other than Drudes
why they have not been corrected and still used by Institutes?


The enrgy and spin of EM waves is well known and predicted from Maxwells
eqations by their deifntion eg enrgy is the conserved noether charge related
to time symmetry.

Does Schwinger already explain the Nimtz experiment ?


The Nimts experiment is quantum experiment - I was clearly referring to
classical electrodynamics. Your claim was not problems with a particular
experiment - your claim was and I quote 'no spin theory and no energy
theory' - which is completely false. If however you believe you have
experimental proof that the predictions of Maxwell's equations or even QED
is false then provide the details so it can be examined.

Rest of incoherent diatribe snipped.

Bill





Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Einstein Mini-nuke, No. 5 edddy Physics - General Discussion 4 March 2nd 05 03:35 PM
A Simulator of the mini-nuke edddy Physics - General Discussion 7 February 24th 05 07:23 PM
MINI-nuke version3 edddy Physics - General Discussion 2 February 22nd 05 02:50 AM
My Newest Nuke design ralph Physics - General Discussion 0 January 26th 05 01:53 AM
Imagine if it was to nuke Iran :-) Maleki Physics - General Discussion 1 September 11th 04 11:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Power Rangers - Mbna - Advertising - Internet Advertising - Keyword Suggestion & Research