A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

Is Unruh radiation the basis for it all?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 22nd 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
chri_schiller@yahoo.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 41
Default Is Unruh radiation the basis for it all?


FrediFizzx wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
| In more detail, the question is whether the cosmological horizon

could
| continuously emit FDU radiation which is redshifted into 3K photons
| and partly, after a longer process that includes annihilation and

more,
| into baryons. In simple words, one could rephrase the question as:
| "Are we - humans - made of FDU radiation remainders?"
| The model would be a mixture of big bang model and quasi steady
| state model; it would still allow for expansion and density

reduction
| of the universe, but it would include continuous matter and
| radiation creation at the horizon.
|
| Since this model is in (slight) contrast with the standard model,
| there must be something wrong with it. What would the arguments
| against it be?

This concept is very similar to what John Polasek's describes in his
"Dual Space" book. He is a regular poster here and he would probably
sent you a copy of his book if you ask him. However, he discounts

the
BB model. Un-necessarily, IMHO. Via his dual space concept, he does
reach the idea of maximum force being related to Newton's G and the
concept of contiunous mass-energy creation. Much like what you have
done. Even though John has not done it strictly mathematically, I
believe that it might be possible to show that GR is emergent from

this
model using what you have done already that GR can be shown to be
derived from and consistent with max force.


Well, these are not arguments against the idea of horizons as source
of matter... I want to show what is wrong about it and what is not.

Regards

Christoph

P.S. I will read whatever I receive per mail :-)

Ads
  #2  
Old May 22nd 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
FrediFizzx
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,403
Default Is Unruh radiation the basis for it all?

wrote in message
oups.com...
|
| FrediFizzx wrote:
| wrote in message
| oups.com...
| | In more detail, the question is whether the cosmological horizon
| could
| | continuously emit FDU radiation which is redshifted into 3K
photons
| | and partly, after a longer process that includes annihilation and
| more,
| | into baryons. In simple words, one could rephrase the question as:
| | "Are we - humans - made of FDU radiation remainders?"
| | The model would be a mixture of big bang model and quasi steady
| | state model; it would still allow for expansion and density
| reduction
| | of the universe, but it would include continuous matter and
| | radiation creation at the horizon.
| |
| | Since this model is in (slight) contrast with the standard model,
| | there must be something wrong with it. What would the arguments
| | against it be?
|
| This concept is very similar to what John Polasek's describes in his
| "Dual Space" book. He is a regular poster here and he would
probably
| sent you a copy of his book if you ask him. However, he discounts
| the
| BB model. Un-necessarily, IMHO. Via his dual space concept, he
does
| reach the idea of maximum force being related to Newton's G and the
| concept of contiunous mass-energy creation. Much like what you have
| done. Even though John has not done it strictly mathematically, I
| believe that it might be possible to show that GR is emergent from
| this
| model using what you have done already that GR can be shown to be
| derived from and consistent with max force.
|
| Well, these are not arguments against the idea of horizons as source
| of matter... I want to show what is wrong about it and what is not.
|
| Regards
|
| Christoph

Yes, I know. I saw that you also posted this in s.p.research on May
14th with no one commenting about it. I am hoping that some of the
physicists that frequent here (or spr) would have some comment about it
as I am highly interested in seeing a good discussion about this topic
as I think it could be very important. But as you can see from my first
reply, I am slightly prejudiced in favor of constant mass-energy
creation into our "Universe" from possibly a "multi-verse" or whatever
might be "outside" of our event horizon. ;-)

Perhaps if you could post some of the math for the Unruh radiation
aspect, someone might respond?

FrediFizzx

http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/qu...uum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/qu...cuum_charge.ps

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EP and Unruh - effect (Layman) we_pretty@yahoo.com Current Physics Research (Moderated) 48 September 9th 05 04:41 PM
What is the 'Unruh Effect'? the softrat Current Physics Research (Moderated) 13 August 22nd 05 11:19 PM
Unruh radiation and Feynmans graphs exponent137 Physics - General Discussion 0 August 1st 05 12:50 PM
Is Unruh radiation the basis for it all? chri_schiller@yahoo.com Physics - General Discussion 4 May 23rd 05 03:18 AM
Are we made of Fulling-Davies-Unruh radiation? chri_schiller@yahoo.com Current Physics Research (Moderated) 0 May 14th 05 12:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Credit Cards - Personal Loans - News - Cheap Loan