A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , ,

Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old May 19th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Bilge
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,439
Default Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.

harry:

Bilge wrote:
Harry:
"Bilge" wrote in message


No, it isn't. Relativistic mass is the total energy.

Bilge, You are confused about definitions, units and concepts and

here you
insist on staying confused.


You're an idiot.


Sigh. Units and concepts of physical quantities are at the very basics
of physics.


Then you should study units and concepts of physical quantities so that
you don't have so much difficulty understanding physics.

Were you so good in math that your teachers made the
mistake to let you skip a class?


That statement sums up your logical abilities. You seem to be one of the
fascist indoctrination types. Do you really think someone should take a
class if the person already knows the subject? Is that because you think
conformity and uniformity are more important than learning, so that
everyone has to take the same classes regardless of his/her abilities?



Ads
  #52  
Old May 20th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Harry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,152
Default Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.


"Bilge" wrote in message
...
harry:

Bilge wrote:
Harry:
"Bilge" wrote in message

No, it isn't. Relativistic mass is the total energy.

Bilge, You are confused about definitions, units and concepts and

here you
insist on staying confused.

You're an idiot.


Sigh. Units and concepts of physical quantities are at the very basics
of physics.


Then you should study units and concepts of physical quantities so that
you don't have so much difficulty understanding physics.

Were you so good in math that your teachers made the
mistake to let you skip a class?


That statement sums up your logical abilities. You seem to be one of the
fascist indoctrination types. Do you really think someone should take a
class if the person already knows the subject? Is that because you think
conformity and uniformity are more important than learning, so that
everyone has to take the same classes regardless of his/her abilities?


That means yes?! When you skip subjects, there is a risk to miss something
essential.


  #53  
Old May 20th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Bilge
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,439
Default Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.

Harry:

"Bilge" wrote in message
ue-al.net...
harry:

Bilge wrote:
Harry:
"Bilge" wrote in message

No, it isn't. Relativistic mass is the total energy.

Bilge, You are confused about definitions, units and concepts and
here you
insist on staying confused.

You're an idiot.

Sigh. Units and concepts of physical quantities are at the very basics
of physics.


Then you should study units and concepts of physical quantities so that
you don't have so much difficulty understanding physics.

Were you so good in math that your teachers made the
mistake to let you skip a class?


That statement sums up your logical abilities. You seem to be one of the
fascist indoctrination types. Do you really think someone should take a
class if the person already knows the subject? Is that because you think
conformity and uniformity are more important than learning, so that
everyone has to take the same classes regardless of his/her abilities?


That means yes?!


No, it doesn't mean ``yes.'' You'll have to divide the sentence into
its individual logical components, since a yes or no answer would
be inconsistent with the correct answers to the two different questions
you've merged.

When you skip subjects, there is a risk to miss something essential.


Ok, then since I've taken a great many more physics classes than you
have, you've obviously missed a great deal of essential material. Get
back to me when you've taken those courses.



  #54  
Old May 20th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
parallelepiped
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.

Ok, then since I've taken a great many more physics classes than you
have, you've obviously missed a great deal of essential material. Get
back to me when you've taken those courses.


which ones do I need to take, I only need enough courses making me able
to make just a single small prediction

thank you in advance

  #55  
Old May 21st 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Bilge
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,439
Default Length "contraction" and time "dialation" bad language.

parallelepiped:
Ok, then since I've taken a great many more physics classes than you
have, you've obviously missed a great deal of essential material. Get
back to me when you've taken those courses.


which ones do I need to take, I only need enough courses making me able
to make just a single small prediction


You'll have to ask harry. He's the one who placed the emphansis
on coursework. I'm only requiring him to apply his standard to
himself.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GR-c goes "instantaneously" from 0 to c ..in NO time.!! But jOE, Tom Roberts says LiGHT "STOPs slowing down".!! [ Does SPEED c "STOP slowing down" instantaneously.? ] [ Does VELOCiTY c "STOP slowing down" .. brian a m stuckless Physics - General Discussion 2 November 16th 05 03:55 PM
"length contraction" according to Lorentz and Poincare - An example Harry The Theory of Relativity 32 December 31st 04 05:28 PM
Funny, "real" length contraction Harry The Theory of Relativity 2 September 29th 04 04:05 PM
(Don Van) "Mass"(enhoven) vs. (Dougie) "Weight" vs. (Craig M"uni)ts" The Original Archie Leach Physics - General Discussion 16 April 16th 04 02:05 AM
(Don Van) "Mass"(enhoven) vs. (Dougie) "Weight" vs. (Craig M"uni)ts" The Original Archie Leach Physics - General Discussion 0 April 11th 04 05:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Tax - Debt Help - Property in Spain - Maplestory Hacks - MPAA