![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: bad, language, length, quotcontractionquot, quotdialationquot, time |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
harry:
Bilge wrote: Harry: "Bilge" wrote in message No, it isn't. Relativistic mass is the total energy. Bilge, You are confused about definitions, units and concepts and here you insist on staying confused. You're an idiot. Sigh. Units and concepts of physical quantities are at the very basics of physics. Then you should study units and concepts of physical quantities so that you don't have so much difficulty understanding physics. Were you so good in math that your teachers made the mistake to let you skip a class? That statement sums up your logical abilities. You seem to be one of the fascist indoctrination types. Do you really think someone should take a class if the person already knows the subject? Is that because you think conformity and uniformity are more important than learning, so that everyone has to take the same classes regardless of his/her abilities? |
| Ads |
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bilge" wrote in message ... harry: Bilge wrote: Harry: "Bilge" wrote in message No, it isn't. Relativistic mass is the total energy. Bilge, You are confused about definitions, units and concepts and here you insist on staying confused. You're an idiot. Sigh. Units and concepts of physical quantities are at the very basics of physics. Then you should study units and concepts of physical quantities so that you don't have so much difficulty understanding physics. Were you so good in math that your teachers made the mistake to let you skip a class? That statement sums up your logical abilities. You seem to be one of the fascist indoctrination types. Do you really think someone should take a class if the person already knows the subject? Is that because you think conformity and uniformity are more important than learning, so that everyone has to take the same classes regardless of his/her abilities? That means yes?! When you skip subjects, there is a risk to miss something essential. |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
Harry:
"Bilge" wrote in message ue-al.net... harry: Bilge wrote: Harry: "Bilge" wrote in message No, it isn't. Relativistic mass is the total energy. Bilge, You are confused about definitions, units and concepts and here you insist on staying confused. You're an idiot. Sigh. Units and concepts of physical quantities are at the very basics of physics. Then you should study units and concepts of physical quantities so that you don't have so much difficulty understanding physics. Were you so good in math that your teachers made the mistake to let you skip a class? That statement sums up your logical abilities. You seem to be one of the fascist indoctrination types. Do you really think someone should take a class if the person already knows the subject? Is that because you think conformity and uniformity are more important than learning, so that everyone has to take the same classes regardless of his/her abilities? That means yes?! No, it doesn't mean ``yes.'' You'll have to divide the sentence into its individual logical components, since a yes or no answer would be inconsistent with the correct answers to the two different questions you've merged. When you skip subjects, there is a risk to miss something essential. Ok, then since I've taken a great many more physics classes than you have, you've obviously missed a great deal of essential material. Get back to me when you've taken those courses. |
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, then since I've taken a great many more physics classes than you
have, you've obviously missed a great deal of essential material. Get back to me when you've taken those courses. which ones do I need to take, I only need enough courses making me able to make just a single small prediction thank you in advance |
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
parallelepiped:
Ok, then since I've taken a great many more physics classes than you have, you've obviously missed a great deal of essential material. Get back to me when you've taken those courses. which ones do I need to take, I only need enough courses making me able to make just a single small prediction You'll have to ask harry. He's the one who placed the emphansis on coursework. I'm only requiring him to apply his standard to himself. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GR-c goes "instantaneously" from 0 to c ..in NO time.!! But jOE, Tom Roberts says LiGHT "STOPs slowing down".!! [ Does SPEED c "STOP slowing down" instantaneously.? ] [ Does VELOCiTY c "STOP slowing down" .. | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | November 16th 05 03:55 PM |
| "length contraction" according to Lorentz and Poincare - An example | Harry | The Theory of Relativity | 32 | December 31st 04 05:28 PM |
| Funny, "real" length contraction | Harry | The Theory of Relativity | 2 | September 29th 04 04:05 PM |
| (Don Van) "Mass"(enhoven) vs. (Dougie) "Weight" vs. (Craig M"uni)ts" | The Original Archie Leach | Physics - General Discussion | 16 | April 16th 04 02:05 AM |
| (Don Van) "Mass"(enhoven) vs. (Dougie) "Weight" vs. (Craig M"uni)ts" | The Original Archie Leach | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | April 11th 04 05:47 PM |