![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: drag |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Isn't spiral galaxy like M74
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap050330.html is well enough proof what gravity probe B is trying to prove, that earth rotation grags space time, by looking at the picture above the arms of galaxy due to drag of space |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
It could also be fairly normal gas dynamics: densification and
rarification in a rotating body of gas and dust. You get the pile-ups at the spiral arms and rarification between them. The outer edges "drag" behind because they have lower orbital velocities than material closer to the galactic core. Mike Miller |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"George" wrote in message
... Isn't spiral galaxy like M74 http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap050330.html is well enough proof what gravity probe B is trying to prove, that earth rotation grags space time, by looking at the picture above the arms of galaxy due to drag of space No. Spiral arms are well explained via Newtonian gravitation. [Old Man] |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Old Man wrote:
"George" wrote in message ... Isn't spiral galaxy like M74 http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap050330.html is well enough proof what gravity probe B is trying to prove, that earth rotation grags space time, by looking at the picture above the arms of galaxy due to drag of space No. This is simple rotation, and not the Lense-Thirring effect that is given the rather misleading sound bite "dragging space". No. Spiral arms are well explained via Newtonian gravitation. But, of course, you must include some dark matter to reconcile the rotation rate with the luminosity. Tom Roberts |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Paul B. Andersen wrote:
(Because it has been known for a long time that your rather - sorry - naive explanation doesn't work. No problem. I knew I was leaving something out. I just figured the answer was more mundane than relativistic dragging. Mike Miller |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Take another drag, it might extend your life. | Jeff_Relf | Physics - General Discussion | 131 | July 26th 05 12:17 AM |
| Drag | George | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | May 10th 05 02:48 PM |
| PHOTONS ARE A DRAG | Sam Wormley | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | December 6th 03 01:03 AM |
| water drag | mikecoon | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | October 10th 03 07:32 PM |
| Drag Coefficient | John E. Prussing | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | August 23rd 03 03:39 AM |