A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

How the Aether Physics Model came to be



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 13th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Ben
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 28
Default How the Aether Physics Model came to be

"David Thomson" wrote in message ...
I was posting on another list when one of the readers suggested I use my
reply as a general introduction to the Aether Physics Model on these
newsgroups. So here is how the Aether Physics Model came to be.

I was working on a flat spiral coil and placing a fluorescent tube between
the top load and ground wire of the coil. I noticed that the spark going to
the topload was a thin purple streamer and the spark going to the ground was
a thick, white streamer.

Until then, I was under the impression that electricity changed its outward
form because of the coil arrangement, frequency, current, potential, etc.
But here I had a single coil, the same shape feeding both ends. The same
frequency existed at both ends. But it became evident that the potential
was greater on the topload and the current was greater on the ground end.
As a result of these differences, the appearance of the spark changed
dramatically.

Thus I surmised that the same electrons in a given coil can manifest in two
distinctly different forms. I then posted this observation on the pupman
list and began searching the literature for an explanation. Finding none, I
decided to investigate physics from the ground up to see if something was
missed.

It didn't take but a few days before I realized that charge should be
distributed in the math, since it is also distributed in nature. Ed Philips
suggested I read Great Experiments in Physics so I purchased a copy. In
this book Charles Coulomb himself clearly stated that all charge must be
distributed in order for the inverse square law to work.

The first thing I noticed in physics was that Coulomb's constant was
precisely equal to a combination of light speed, permeability, permittivity,
and a conductance constant, which the established literature does not
recognize. I then found that Planck's constant times the conductance
constant gives a distributed charge. But I was disappointed that the
distributed charge it produced did not equal the elementary charge squared.
So I worked with the two distributed charges for a few hours before
discovering that they were exactly proportional to each other by way of 8pi
times the fine structure constant of the electron. And so I had this
equation:

e^2 = 8pia e.emax^2

where e is the elementary charge, a is the fine structure of the electron,
and e.emax^2 is the derived value of charge equal to:

e.emax^2 = h * Cd

I then applied the same process to the proton and neutron and found fine
structures for both. But since the fine structures and angular momentum of
the proton and neutron are not defined in modern physics, I really didn't
have an empirical body of data to go by there. However, the lack of data
was encouraging since it implied that modern physics was incapable of
determining these values based on their chosen model of subatomic behavior.

Three weeks went by before it occurred to me that e.emax^2 could be strong
charge, which mediates the strong force. I then realized that if it were,
then I was looking at the Unified Field Theory. Further research showed me
that it has nothing to do with fields, but is rather a Unified Force Theory.
I later found that the concept of fields is very ambiguous in the Standard
Model and relativity theories, as modern science apparently does not know
what a field really is.

When I calculated the relative value of the forces for the different
subatomic particles, looking at both the electrostatic force and the new
concept of strong force, I found that the relative strengths of the forces
matched the empirical data.

Then I started reading older literature on electromagnetism. I was
particularly struck by Ed Leedskalnin's description of electricity as a
stream of tiny magnets. Although his view incorrectly denies the
electrostatic effect of electrons, he does show a convincing argument for
electrons acting as tiny magnets. And then it occurred to me that
electromagnetism is caused by the strong charge. Further analysis of the
mathematical aspects of the two charges revealed that electrostatic charge
has a spherical geometry while strong charge (or electromagnetic charge) has
a toroidal geometry.

When I applied this knowledge to my coil observations it made perfect sense.
When electrons are magnetically moving sideways in the coil, they produce
the bright white streamers. When electrons are moving along their z axis,
they produce the thin purple streamers. Electrons moving along their z axis
are creating pressure on the electrons in front of them, thus potential
increases. Electrons moving sideways along the circular y axis and outward
on the x axis (it is a polar coordinate system) they move closer to each and
form longitudinal waves of electrons.

Hertz was broadcasting from the top load and Tesla was broadcasting from the
ground. This is why Tesla's system of signaling was notably different from
Hertz. Whereas Hertz's system caused the electrons to transform into
photons and radiate permanently away from the transmitter, thus causing
power loss, Tesla's system was pumped into the ground, which is a closed
system. This allowed Tesla to longitudinally broadcast current through the
electrostatic field of the Earth and have that current return to his
transmitter. Thus he could build up resonance within the Earth with very
little power loss.

But I as I was working on this Unified Force Theory, it occurred to me that
the units were in the wrong dimensions of charge, except three of them. The
units of inductance, capacitance, and conductance were in the proper
distributed charge, while all other units with charge were in single
dimension. Investigating the various changes that take place when the
dimensions are corrected in the units led me to the development of the
Aether Physics Model.




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---




This is very interesting. Not only do I feel that you are on to
something. But I have posted ,"Are gravitational waves electromagnetic
waves?", on the group.
I was relating to the possibility that electromagnetic waves are a
compression and expansion of the space-time continuum, rather than
gravitational waves.
Your posting not only bolsters my own theory (where I am just
realising the implications of experimental evidence and well founded
theories), but makes some valid points of its own.
If LIGO detects gravitational waves (an expansion and compression of
space-time), then it is experimental evidence that this 5th dimension
exists.

I would be interested to hear your thoughts on my discussion with
PD(although he thinks I'm making the whole theory up).

Regards Ben
Ads
  #2  
Old February 13th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Bill Hobba
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,088
Default How the Aether Physics Model came to be


"Ben" wrote in message
om...
"David Thomson" wrote in message

...
I was posting on another list when one of the readers suggested I use my
reply as a general introduction to the Aether Physics Model on these
newsgroups. So here is how the Aether Physics Model came to be.

I was working on a flat spiral coil and placing a fluorescent tube

between
the top load and ground wire of the coil. I noticed that the spark

going to
the topload was a thin purple streamer and the spark going to the ground

was
a thick, white streamer.

Until then, I was under the impression that electricity changed its

outward
form because of the coil arrangement, frequency, current, potential,

etc.
But here I had a single coil, the same shape feeding both ends. The

same
frequency existed at both ends. But it became evident that the

potential
was greater on the topload and the current was greater on the ground

end.
As a result of these differences, the appearance of the spark changed
dramatically.

Thus I surmised that the same electrons in a given coil can manifest in

two
distinctly different forms. I then posted this observation on the

pupman
list and began searching the literature for an explanation. Finding

none, I
decided to investigate physics from the ground up to see if something

was
missed.

It didn't take but a few days before I realized that charge should be
distributed in the math, since it is also distributed in nature. Ed

Philips
suggested I read Great Experiments in Physics so I purchased a copy. In
this book Charles Coulomb himself clearly stated that all charge must be
distributed in order for the inverse square law to work.

The first thing I noticed in physics was that Coulomb's constant was
precisely equal to a combination of light speed, permeability,

permittivity,
and a conductance constant, which the established literature does not
recognize. I then found that Planck's constant times the conductance
constant gives a distributed charge. But I was disappointed that the
distributed charge it produced did not equal the elementary charge

squared.
So I worked with the two distributed charges for a few hours before
discovering that they were exactly proportional to each other by way of

8pi
times the fine structure constant of the electron. And so I had this
equation:

e^2 = 8pia e.emax^2

where e is the elementary charge, a is the fine structure of the

electron,
and e.emax^2 is the derived value of charge equal to:

e.emax^2 = h * Cd

I then applied the same process to the proton and neutron and found fine
structures for both. But since the fine structures and angular momentum

of
the proton and neutron are not defined in modern physics, I really

didn't
have an empirical body of data to go by there. However, the lack of

data
was encouraging since it implied that modern physics was incapable of
determining these values based on their chosen model of subatomic

behavior.

Three weeks went by before it occurred to me that e.emax^2 could be

strong
charge, which mediates the strong force. I then realized that if it

were,
then I was looking at the Unified Field Theory. Further research showed

me
that it has nothing to do with fields, but is rather a Unified Force

Theory.
I later found that the concept of fields is very ambiguous in the

Standard
Model and relativity theories, as modern science apparently does not

know
what a field really is.

When I calculated the relative value of the forces for the different
subatomic particles, looking at both the electrostatic force and the new
concept of strong force, I found that the relative strengths of the

forces
matched the empirical data.

Then I started reading older literature on electromagnetism. I was
particularly struck by Ed Leedskalnin's description of electricity as a
stream of tiny magnets. Although his view incorrectly denies the
electrostatic effect of electrons, he does show a convincing argument

for
electrons acting as tiny magnets. And then it occurred to me that
electromagnetism is caused by the strong charge. Further analysis of

the
mathematical aspects of the two charges revealed that electrostatic

charge
has a spherical geometry while strong charge (or electromagnetic charge)

has
a toroidal geometry.

When I applied this knowledge to my coil observations it made perfect

sense.
When electrons are magnetically moving sideways in the coil, they

produce
the bright white streamers. When electrons are moving along their z

axis,
they produce the thin purple streamers. Electrons moving along their z

axis
are creating pressure on the electrons in front of them, thus potential
increases. Electrons moving sideways along the circular y axis and

outward
on the x axis (it is a polar coordinate system) they move closer to each

and
form longitudinal waves of electrons.

Hertz was broadcasting from the top load and Tesla was broadcasting from

the
ground. This is why Tesla's system of signaling was notably different

from
Hertz. Whereas Hertz's system caused the electrons to transform into
photons and radiate permanently away from the transmitter, thus causing
power loss, Tesla's system was pumped into the ground, which is a closed
system. This allowed Tesla to longitudinally broadcast current through

the
electrostatic field of the Earth and have that current return to his
transmitter. Thus he could build up resonance within the Earth with

very
little power loss.

But I as I was working on this Unified Force Theory, it occurred to me

that
the units were in the wrong dimensions of charge, except three of them.

The
units of inductance, capacitance, and conductance were in the proper
distributed charge, while all other units with charge were in single
dimension. Investigating the various changes that take place when the
dimensions are corrected in the units led me to the development of the
Aether Physics Model.




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet

News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000

Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---




This is very interesting. Not only do I feel that you are on to
something. But I have posted ,"Are gravitational waves electromagnetic
waves?", on the group.
I was relating to the possibility that electromagnetic waves are a
compression and expansion of the space-time continuum, rather than
gravitational waves.


The problem is you do not know basic physics. EM is described by a 4 vector
gravity by a tensor.

Your posting not only bolsters my own theory (where I am just
realising the implications of experimental evidence and well founded
theories), but makes some valid points of its own.


David Thomson is a well known crank whose views, in this posting alone, have
been thoughly discredited by Bilge.

If LIGO detects gravitational waves (an expansion and compression of
space-time), then it is experimental evidence that this 5th dimension
exists.


You are intermixing ideas atrociously. First you say that that
'electromagnetic waves are a compression and expansion of the space-time
continuum' then you invoke the 5th dimension where EM is an artifact of the
cylinder condition imposed on the 5th dimension having nothing to do with
the space-time continuum. If you are considering Kaluza-Klien theories then
EM results from the left over covariance imposed by the cylinder condition -
see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9805018.


I would be interested to hear your thoughts on my discussion with
PD(although he thinks I'm making the whole theory up).


How about being precise in detialing those ideas?

Bill


Regards Ben



  #3  
Old February 14th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Bilge
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,439
Default How the Aether Physics Model came to be

Ben:

This is very interesting. Not only do I feel that you are on to
something. But I have posted ,"Are gravitational waves electromagnetic
waves?", on the group.
I was relating to the possibility that electromagnetic waves are a
compression and expansion of the space-time continuum, rather than
gravitational waves.


Electromagnetic waves cannot be compression waves. Compression waves
are longitudinal. Electromagnetic waves are purely transverse.

  #5  
Old February 14th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Ben
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 28
Default How the Aether Physics Model came to be

"Bill Hobba" wrote in message ...
"Ben" wrote in message
om...
"David Thomson" wrote in message

...
I was posting on another list when one of the readers suggested I use my
reply as a general introduction to the Aether Physics Model on these
newsgroups. So here is how the Aether Physics Model came to be.

I was working on a flat spiral coil and placing a fluorescent tube

between
the top load and ground wire of the coil. I noticed that the spark

going to
the topload was a thin purple streamer and the spark going to the ground

was
a thick, white streamer.

Until then, I was under the impression that electricity changed its

outward
form because of the coil arrangement, frequency, current, potential,

etc.
But here I had a single coil, the same shape feeding both ends. The

same
frequency existed at both ends. But it became evident that the

potential
was greater on the topload and the current was greater on the ground

end.
As a result of these differences, the appearance of the spark changed
dramatically.

Thus I surmised that the same electrons in a given coil can manifest in

two
distinctly different forms. I then posted this observation on the

pupman
list and began searching the literature for an explanation. Finding

none, I
decided to investigate physics from the ground up to see if something

was
missed.

It didn't take but a few days before I realized that charge should be
distributed in the math, since it is also distributed in nature. Ed

Philips
suggested I read Great Experiments in Physics so I purchased a copy. In
this book Charles Coulomb himself clearly stated that all charge must be
distributed in order for the inverse square law to work.

The first thing I noticed in physics was that Coulomb's constant was
precisely equal to a combination of light speed, permeability,

permittivity,
and a conductance constant, which the established literature does not
recognize. I then found that Planck's constant times the conductance
constant gives a distributed charge. But I was disappointed that the
distributed charge it produced did not equal the elementary charge

squared.
So I worked with the two distributed charges for a few hours before
discovering that they were exactly proportional to each other by way of

8pi
times the fine structure constant of the electron. And so I had this
equation:

e^2 = 8pia e.emax^2

where e is the elementary charge, a is the fine structure of the

electron,
and e.emax^2 is the derived value of charge equal to:

e.emax^2 = h * Cd

I then applied the same process to the proton and neutron and found fine
structures for both. But since the fine structures and angular momentum

of
the proton and neutron are not defined in modern physics, I really

didn't
have an empirical body of data to go by there. However, the lack of

data
was encouraging since it implied that modern physics was incapable of
determining these values based on their chosen model of subatomic

behavior.

Three weeks went by before it occurred to me that e.emax^2 could be

strong
charge, which mediates the strong force. I then realized that if it

were,
then I was looking at the Unified Field Theory. Further research showed

me
that it has nothing to do with fields, but is rather a Unified Force

Theory.
I later found that the concept of fields is very ambiguous in the

Standard
Model and relativity theories, as modern science apparently does not

know
what a field really is.

When I calculated the relative value of the forces for the different
subatomic particles, looking at both the electrostatic force and the new
concept of strong force, I found that the relative strengths of the

forces
matched the empirical data.

Then I started reading older literature on electromagnetism. I was
particularly struck by Ed Leedskalnin's description of electricity as a
stream of tiny magnets. Although his view incorrectly denies the
electrostatic effect of electrons, he does show a convincing argument

for
electrons acting as tiny magnets. And then it occurred to me that
electromagnetism is caused by the strong charge. Further analysis of

the
mathematical aspects of the two charges revealed that electrostatic

charge
has a spherical geometry while strong charge (or electromagnetic charge)

has
a toroidal geometry.

When I applied this knowledge to my coil observations it made perfect

sense.
When electrons are magnetically moving sideways in the coil, they

produce
the bright white streamers. When electrons are moving along their z

axis,
they produce the thin purple streamers. Electrons moving along their z

axis
are creating pressure on the electrons in front of them, thus potential
increases. Electrons moving sideways along the circular y axis and

outward
on the x axis (it is a polar coordinate system) they move closer to each

and
form longitudinal waves of electrons.

Hertz was broadcasting from the top load and Tesla was broadcasting from

the
ground. This is why Tesla's system of signaling was notably different

from
Hertz. Whereas Hertz's system caused the electrons to transform into
photons and radiate permanently away from the transmitter, thus causing
power loss, Tesla's system was pumped into the ground, which is a closed
system. This allowed Tesla to longitudinally broadcast current through

the
electrostatic field of the Earth and have that current return to his
transmitter. Thus he could build up resonance within the Earth with

very
little power loss.

But I as I was working on this Unified Force Theory, it occurred to me

that
the units were in the wrong dimensions of charge, except three of them.

The
units of inductance, capacitance, and conductance were in the proper
distributed charge, while all other units with charge were in single
dimension. Investigating the various changes that take place when the
dimensions are corrected in the units led me to the development of the
Aether Physics Model.




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet

News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000

Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---




This is very interesting. Not only do I feel that you are on to
something. But I have posted ,"Are gravitational waves electromagnetic
waves?", on the group.
I was relating to the possibility that electromagnetic waves are a
compression and expansion of the space-time continuum, rather than
gravitational waves.


The problem is you do not know basic physics. EM is described by a 4 vector
gravity by a tensor.

Your posting not only bolsters my own theory (where I am just
realising the implications of experimental evidence and well founded
theories), but makes some valid points of its own.


David Thomson is a well known crank whose views, in this posting alone, have
been thoughly discredited by Bilge.

If LIGO detects gravitational waves (an expansion and compression of
space-time), then it is experimental evidence that this 5th dimension
exists.


You are intermixing ideas atrociously. First you say that that
'electromagnetic waves are a compression and expansion of the space-time
continuum' then you invoke the 5th dimension where EM is an artifact of the
cylinder condition imposed on the 5th dimension having nothing to do with
the space-time continuum. If you are considering Kaluza-Klien theories then
EM results from the left over covariance imposed by the cylinder condition -
see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9805018.


I would be interested to hear your thoughts on my discussion with
PD(although he thinks I'm making the whole theory up).


How about being precise in detialing those ideas?

Bill


Would you describe the compression of space-time, by a body such as a
star, to be a separate dimension from the 4 existing dimensions. I ask
because, surely there must be a dimension to alter the existing 4. If
this was not the case, then wouldn't these dimensions have to remain
unchanged?

Regards Ben
  #6  
Old February 14th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,805
Default How the Aether Physics Model came to be

Dear Ben:

"Ben" wrote in message
om...
"Bill Hobba" wrote in message
...

....
I would be interested to hear your thoughts on my discussion with
PD(although he thinks I'm making the whole theory up).


How about being precise in detialing those ideas?


Would you describe the compression of space-time, by a body such as a
star, to be a separate dimension from the 4 existing dimensions.


Compression by definition is within the discussed dimensions.

I ask
because, surely there must be a dimension to alter the existing 4.


Surely there is no correlation. If I compress the distance between two
points by 0.0001 m, then the effect is contained in that "axis". Nothing
else "gave up or got" that 0.0001 m.

If
this was not the case, then wouldn't these dimensions have to remain
unchanged?


No. Spacetime is the product of mass/energy. If mass/energy alters this
relationship, then there is no other agent necessary.

David A. Smith


  #7  
Old February 14th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Bilge
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,439
Default How the Aether Physics Model came to be

Ben:
(Bilge) wrote in message news:
Ben:

This is very interesting. Not only do I feel that you are on to
something. But I have posted ,"Are gravitational waves electromagnetic
waves?", on the group.
I was relating to the possibility that electromagnetic waves are a
compression and expansion of the space-time continuum, rather than
gravitational waves.


Electromagnetic waves cannot be compression waves. Compression waves
are longitudinal. Electromagnetic waves are purely transverse.


How would you describe a sound wave in the same respect?


Sound waves are compression waves.

  #8  
Old February 15th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Bill Hobba
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,088
Default How the Aether Physics Model came to be


"Ben" wrote in message
om...
"Bill Hobba" wrote in message

...
"Ben" wrote in message
om...
"David Thomson" wrote in message

...
I was posting on another list when one of the readers suggested I

use my
reply as a general introduction to the Aether Physics Model on these
newsgroups. So here is how the Aether Physics Model came to be.

I was working on a flat spiral coil and placing a fluorescent tube

between
the top load and ground wire of the coil. I noticed that the spark

going to
the topload was a thin purple streamer and the spark going to the

ground
was
a thick, white streamer.

Until then, I was under the impression that electricity changed its

outward
form because of the coil arrangement, frequency, current, potential,

etc.
But here I had a single coil, the same shape feeding both ends. The

same
frequency existed at both ends. But it became evident that the

potential
was greater on the topload and the current was greater on the ground

end.
As a result of these differences, the appearance of the spark

changed
dramatically.

Thus I surmised that the same electrons in a given coil can manifest

in
two
distinctly different forms. I then posted this observation on the

pupman
list and began searching the literature for an explanation. Finding

none, I
decided to investigate physics from the ground up to see if

something
was
missed.

It didn't take but a few days before I realized that charge should

be
distributed in the math, since it is also distributed in nature. Ed

Philips
suggested I read Great Experiments in Physics so I purchased a copy.

In
this book Charles Coulomb himself clearly stated that all charge

must be
distributed in order for the inverse square law to work.

The first thing I noticed in physics was that Coulomb's constant was
precisely equal to a combination of light speed, permeability,

permittivity,
and a conductance constant, which the established literature does

not
recognize. I then found that Planck's constant times the

conductance
constant gives a distributed charge. But I was disappointed that

the
distributed charge it produced did not equal the elementary charge

squared.
So I worked with the two distributed charges for a few hours before
discovering that they were exactly proportional to each other by way

of
8pi
times the fine structure constant of the electron. And so I had

this
equation:

e^2 = 8pia e.emax^2

where e is the elementary charge, a is the fine structure of the

electron,
and e.emax^2 is the derived value of charge equal to:

e.emax^2 = h * Cd

I then applied the same process to the proton and neutron and found

fine
structures for both. But since the fine structures and angular

momentum
of
the proton and neutron are not defined in modern physics, I really

didn't
have an empirical body of data to go by there. However, the lack of

data
was encouraging since it implied that modern physics was incapable

of
determining these values based on their chosen model of subatomic

behavior.

Three weeks went by before it occurred to me that e.emax^2 could be

strong
charge, which mediates the strong force. I then realized that if it

were,
then I was looking at the Unified Field Theory. Further research

showed
me
that it has nothing to do with fields, but is rather a Unified Force

Theory.
I later found that the concept of fields is very ambiguous in the

Standard
Model and relativity theories, as modern science apparently does not

know
what a field really is.

When I calculated the relative value of the forces for the different
subatomic particles, looking at both the electrostatic force and the

new
concept of strong force, I found that the relative strengths of the

forces
matched the empirical data.

Then I started reading older literature on electromagnetism. I was
particularly struck by Ed Leedskalnin's description of electricity

as a
stream of tiny magnets. Although his view incorrectly denies the
electrostatic effect of electrons, he does show a convincing

argument
for
electrons acting as tiny magnets. And then it occurred to me that
electromagnetism is caused by the strong charge. Further analysis

of
the
mathematical aspects of the two charges revealed that electrostatic

charge
has a spherical geometry while strong charge (or electromagnetic

charge)
has
a toroidal geometry.

When I applied this knowledge to my coil observations it made

perfect
sense.
When electrons are magnetically moving sideways in the coil, they

produce
the bright white streamers. When electrons are moving along their z

axis,
they produce the thin purple streamers. Electrons moving along

their z
axis
are creating pressure on the electrons in front of them, thus

potential
increases. Electrons moving sideways along the circular y axis and

outward
on the x axis (it is a polar coordinate system) they move closer to

each
and
form longitudinal waves of electrons.

Hertz was broadcasting from the top load and Tesla was broadcasting

from
the
ground. This is why Tesla's system of signaling was notably

different
from
Hertz. Whereas Hertz's system caused the electrons to transform

into
photons and radiate permanently away from the transmitter, thus

causing
power loss, Tesla's system was pumped into the ground, which is a

closed
system. This allowed Tesla to longitudinally broadcast current

through
the
electrostatic field of the Earth and have that current return to his
transmitter. Thus he could build up resonance within the Earth with

very
little power loss.

But I as I was working on this Unified Force Theory, it occurred to

me
that
the units were in the wrong dimensions of charge, except three of

them.
The
units of inductance, capacitance, and conductance were in the proper
distributed charge, while all other units with charge were in single
dimension. Investigating the various changes that take place when

the
dimensions are corrected in the units led me to the development of

the
Aether Physics Model.




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet

News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!

100,000
Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption

=---



This is very interesting. Not only do I feel that you are on to
something. But I have posted ,"Are gravitational waves electromagnetic
waves?", on the group.
I was relating to the possibility that electromagnetic waves are a
compression and expansion of the space-time continuum, rather than
gravitational waves.


The problem is you do not know basic physics. EM is described by a 4

vector
gravity by a tensor.

Your posting not only bolsters my own theory (where I am just
realising the implications of experimental evidence and well founded
theories), but makes some valid points of its own.


David Thomson is a well known crank whose views, in this posting alone,

have
been thoughly discredited by Bilge.

If LIGO detects gravitational waves (an expansion and compression of
space-time), then it is experimental evidence that this 5th dimension
exists.


You are intermixing ideas atrociously. First you say that that
'electromagnetic waves are a compression and expansion of the

space-time
continuum' then you invoke the 5th dimension where EM is an artifact of

the
cylinder condition imposed on the 5th dimension having nothing to do

with
the space-time continuum. If you are considering Kaluza-Klien theories

then
EM results from the left over covariance imposed by the cylinder

condition -
see http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/gr-qc/9805018.


I would be interested to hear your thoughts on my discussion with
PD(although he thinks I'm making the whole theory up).


How about being precise in detialing those ideas?

Bill


Would you describe the compression of space-time, by a body such as a
star, to be a separate dimension from the 4 existing dimensions.


I do not know what you mean by compression of space-time. Space-time is
curved by gravity - in fact according to GR gravity is space-time curvature.

I ask
because, surely there must be a dimension to alter the existing 4.


I do not really know what you are trying to say. You may be thinking of the
ideas promulgated by the popular press where they liken space-time curvature
to the bending of a rubber sheet or something like that. That is bad IMHO
because it creates the false impression (among other things) that the
curvature must be taking place in a higher dimension. Unfortunately the
mathematics of the situation does not necessity imply such an
interpretation.

If
this was not the case, then wouldn't these dimensions have to remain
unchanged?


?????????????.

Bill


Regards Ben



  #10  
Old February 16th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity
David Thomson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 761
Default How the Aether Physics Model came to be

"Ben" wrote in message
om...
This is very interesting. Not only do I feel that you are on to
something. But I have posted ,"Are gravitational waves electromagnetic
waves?", on the group.
I was relating to the possibility that electromagnetic waves are a
compression and expansion of the space-time continuum, rather than
gravitational waves.


My physics shows that the space-time continuum can be modulated as
longitudinal waves via magnetic pulses. This is consistent with Nikola
Tesla's work in this area. My theories also show that force is a primary
phenomenon to matter. That is, the Aether has inherent force and it is this
inherent force that ultimately led to the formation of electrons and
protons. The electrons and protons are not the cause of force.

Your posting not only bolsters my own theory (where I am just
realising the implications of experimental evidence and well founded
theories), but makes some valid points of its own.


Thanks.

If LIGO detects gravitational waves (an expansion and compression of
space-time), then it is experimental evidence that this 5th dimension
exists.


Any expansion and contraction of the Aether would be due to the strong
force. In my system of physics, the strong force and gravitational force
are exactly proportional to each other. This is because mass is orthogonal
to strong charge. The strong force and the gravitational force are the same
thing but seen from orthogonal perspectives. This is why Einstein's GR can
produce the correct result based on the wrong theory. Gravity has
absolutely nothing to do with the bending of space-time around massive
objects. It is all due to the strong force in all the matter, which pulls
space-time toward the barycenter of the nuclei.

Dave




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson The Theory of Relativity 18 February 27th 05 08:16 PM
How the Aether Physics Model came to be guskz@hotmail.com The Theory of Relativity 10 February 24th 05 02:58 AM
How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson The Theory of Relativity 3 February 16th 05 05:00 AM
How the Aether Physics Model came to be David Thomson The Theory of Relativity 0 February 13th 05 01:43 AM
How the Aether Physics Model came to be geraldkelleher@hotmail.com The Theory of Relativity 0 February 12th 05 08:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Remortgaging - Cell Phones - Repair Bad Credit - Mortgages - Debt Consolidation