Given an object of scale L and mass M, if we do not want it to collapse
into a black hole then

2GM/c^2 L

Now consider the entire universe with a Hubble horizon L perhaps in the
sense of a (anti) de Sitter space.

Let the dark zero point energy density be ~ c^4/\/G where /\ is
Einstein's cosmological constant. c^4/G is a string tension. The
universe is a big string.

The effective total mass of this dark zero point energy is (neglecting
pi factors etc)

M ~ (c^2/\/G)L^3

Therefore

/\L^3 ~ L

/\ ~ 1/L^2 ~ (10^28 cm)^-2 ~ 10^-7 ergs/cc

This is equivalent to

Dark Energy Density ~ (hc/Lp^4)(Number of Hawking Bits of Hubble Horizon)^-1

In my theory

(Number of Bits of Hubble Horizon) = (1 - Lp^2|Vacuum Coherence|^2)^-1 ~
10^122

This is contingent in sense of the WEP for chaotic inflation with an
infinity of actual parallel universes. This will also work for a small
spherical Poincare dodecahedron "pong game" space that is 80% of
observable universe with 20% as multiple images (dip in wide angle WMAP
power spectrum for low multipoles). We can have an infinity of them as
well some connected to each other by star gates.

Jack Sarfatti wrote:

Given an object of scale L and mass M, if we do not want it to collapse
into a black hole then

2GM/c^2 L

This eqation is nonsense. It is almost right.

L is the infinit point? or the event horizon?
I think he means the diamter of the event horizon
that would be related to the temperature of the black hole.

Now consider the entire universe with a Hubble horizon L perhaps in the
sense of a (anti) de Sitter space.

The definition of a black hold is tha light cannot transit the diameter
of the hole. It cannot escape. our universe is by defintion a low
density very hot black hole.

Let the dark zero point energy density be ~ c^4/\/G where /\ is
Einstein's cosmological constant. c^4/G is a string tension. The
universe is a big string.

is this name dropping string theory?

The effective total mass of this dark zero point energy is (neglecting
pi factors etc)

M ~ (c^2/\/G)L^3

this is just a lot of unresolve terms.
M == mass
c == speed of light
G = 6.672E-11
L does not have a value.
and the exprsssion does not have the part necessary for a equation.


Therefore

/\L^3 ~ L

/\ ~ 1/L^2 ~ (10^28 cm)^-2 ~ 10^-7 ergs/cc

This is equivalent to

Dark Energy Density ~ (hc/Lp^4)(Number of Hawking Bits of Hubble
Horizon)^-1

In my theory

(Number of Bits of Hubble Horizon) = (1 - Lp^2|Vacuum Coherence|^2)^-1 ~
10^122

This is contingent in sense of the WEP for chaotic inflation with an
infinity of actual parallel universes. This will also work for a small
spherical Poincare dodecahedron "pong game" space that is 80% of
observable universe with 20% as multiple images (dip in wide angle WMAP
power spectrum for low multipoles). We can have an infinity of them as
well some connected to each other by star gates.

This is nice science fiction. There is no physical process that has
these consequences.

Just because it has a lot of sloppy math and buzz words it does not mean
that you have effectively fielded a theory, a hyphothsis or even a
theoreical reslult. It is not meaningful.

In article ,
says...

Jack Sarfatti wrote:
The universe is a big string.

is this name dropping string theory?

It's Sarfatti. More like name-dropping sanity.