![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: equations, frames |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote:
Dear Uncle Al: "Uncle Al" wrote in message ... "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote: Dear Uncle Al: "Uncle Al" wrote in message ... "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote: Dear Eric Gisse: "Eric Gisse" wrote in message om... (Titan Point) wrote in message . com... [snip] The detection of neutrons from distant supernovae COOL. Cite? I have never heard of that! TitanPoint may mean this... URL:http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0405/0405006.pdf (plenty more with Google Advanced, requiring the word "supernova" and the exact phrase "detection of neutrons") The neutron is what is detected, in the decay/interaction of *neutrinos* from supernovae. With a halflife of 10 minutes, not many neutrons would survive from distant supernovae. Or it might have been a boo-boo. Or the OP was an even more loathsome spewing idiot that you are. Thanks, Al. Coming from you, this is a compliment. Hey stupid, what is the nominal half-life of a neutron? I think I said 10 minutes above, didn't I? Are you due for a dipstick check? Neutron half-life is about 885.6 seconds, idiot. Pull your thumb out when you spew information. URL:http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...proton.html#c3 QUOTE A free neutron will decay with a half-life of about 10.3 minutes END QUOTE I don't know where your information comes from, but it is apparently not correct. http://pdg.lbl.gov/ [snip] Idiot. 14.76 minutes. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf |
| Ads |
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote:
Uncle Al wrote in message ... Neutron half-life is about 885.6 seconds, Relatively to whom?, You of course. Put a neutron in a powerful g-field or something similiar, inside a nucleus (think super-gravity) and the 1/2 life gets extended. Likely the neutron is stabilized from decay by the Strong Force aside from time dilation effects. Ken Idiot. Interstellar space is Minkowski. Tell us how many gees you would need to extend a 14.76 *minute* half-life to 100 million years. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf |
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear Uncle Al:
"Uncle Al" wrote in message ... "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote: Dear Uncle Al: "Uncle Al" wrote in message ... "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote: Dear Uncle Al: "Uncle Al" wrote in message ... "N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote: Dear Eric Gisse: "Eric Gisse" wrote in message om... (Titan Point) wrote in message . com... [snip] The detection of neutrons from distant supernovae COOL. Cite? I have never heard of that! TitanPoint may mean this... URL:http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0405/0405006.pdf (plenty more with Google Advanced, requiring the word "supernova" and the exact phrase "detection of neutrons") The neutron is what is detected, in the decay/interaction of *neutrinos* from supernovae. With a halflife of 10 minutes, not many neutrons would survive from distant supernovae. Or it might have been a boo-boo. Or the OP was an even more loathsome spewing idiot that you are. Thanks, Al. Coming from you, this is a compliment. Hey stupid, what is the nominal half-life of a neutron? I think I said 10 minutes above, didn't I? Are you due for a dipstick check? Neutron half-life is about 885.6 seconds, idiot. Pull your thumb out when you spew information. URL:http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...proton.html#c3 QUOTE A free neutron will decay with a half-life of about 10.3 minutes END QUOTE I don't know where your information comes from, but it is apparently not correct. http://pdg.lbl.gov/ [snip] Idiot. 14.76 minutes. You should *not* get your information from idiots, Uncle Al. Your citation points to a different number for the lifespan of the neutron, the "mean life", and a host of values are presented: URL:http://pdg.lbl.gov/2004/listings/bxxxcomb.html ... choosing the entry for neutrons: "PostScript PDF (17 pages) n" QUOTE Mean life [...snip...] 885.7 +/- 0.8 886.8 +/- 1.2 885.4 +/- 0.9 889.2 +/- 3.0 882.6 +/- 2.7 888.4 +/- 3.1 887.6 +/- 3.0 891 +/- 9 888.4 +/- 2.9 893.6 +/- 3.8 878 +/- 27 877 +/- 10 876 +/- 10 903 +/- 13 937 +/- 18 875 +/- 95 881 +/- 8 END QUOTE Note that the "mean life" and the "half life" can be mathematically correlated. So Uncle Al, who is the spewing idiot? *You* stated "half life", but quoted figures for "mean life". I think you need another beer... I hope this doesn't mean your eotvos project has been sidetracked? David A. Smith |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
Uncle Al wrote in message ...
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote: Uncle Al wrote in message ... Neutron half-life is about 885.6 seconds, Relatively to whom?, You of course. Put a neutron in a powerful g-field or something similiar, inside a nucleus (think super-gravity) and the 1/2 life gets extended. Likely the neutron is stabilized from decay by the Strong Force aside from time dilation effects. Ken Idiot. Interstellar space is Minkowski. Tell us how many gees you would need to extend a 14.76 *minute* half-life to 100 million years. Aunt Alice, Ref, G_uv =k*T_uv where T_uv has a density of billions of tons/cubic inch. Care to use your abacus to determine time dilation in that nuclear density? I do not know if the dilation is sufficient to impede the decay of the neutron in that density field, do you? Ken S. Tucker VOTE CREATIVE |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| When "Specified" Inertial Frames Suddenly Become Just "Generalized" Frames | G. L. Bradford | Physics - General Discussion | 10 | January 9th 06 04:00 PM |
| Solutions to field equations and maxwell equations | Michael S. | The Theory of Relativity | 1 | September 11th 04 03:46 PM |
| Impulse Equations For Rigid Body Collisons, Are these Equations Right? | John Alway | Physics - General Discussion | 4 | July 2nd 04 05:34 PM |
| Combinations of viewing frames from other frames | Mark Hendy | The Theory of Relativity | 2 | September 22nd 03 06:01 AM |
| Einstein Field Equations and the equations of motion | Bill Hobba | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 1 | September 4th 03 05:49 AM |