A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: ,

Frames and equations



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old October 31st 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,336
Default Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities

"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote:

Dear Uncle Al:

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote:

Dear Uncle Al:

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote:

Dear Eric Gisse:
"Eric Gisse" wrote in message
om...
(Titan Point) wrote in message
. com...
[snip]

The detection of neutrons from distant supernovae

COOL.

Cite? I have never heard of that!

TitanPoint may mean this...
URL:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0405/0405006.pdf
(plenty more with Google Advanced, requiring the word "supernova" and
the
exact phrase "detection of neutrons")

The neutron is what is detected, in the decay/interaction of
*neutrinos*
from supernovae. With a halflife of 10 minutes, not many neutrons
would
survive from distant supernovae.

Or it might have been a boo-boo.

Or the OP was an even more loathsome spewing idiot that you are.

Thanks, Al. Coming from you, this is a compliment.

Hey
stupid, what is the nominal half-life of a neutron?

I think I said 10 minutes above, didn't I? Are you due for a dipstick
check?


Neutron half-life is about 885.6 seconds, idiot. Pull your thumb out
when you spew information.


URL:http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...proton.html#c3
QUOTE
A free neutron will decay with a half-life of about 10.3 minutes
END QUOTE

I don't know where your information comes from, but it is apparently not
correct.

http://pdg.lbl.gov/

[snip]

Idiot. 14.76 minutes.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
Ads
  #42  
Old October 31st 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,336
Default Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities

"Ken S. Tucker" wrote:

Uncle Al wrote in message ...

Neutron half-life is about 885.6 seconds,


Relatively to whom?, You of course.

Put a neutron in a powerful g-field or
something similiar, inside a nucleus
(think super-gravity) and the 1/2 life
gets extended.

Likely the neutron is stabilized from
decay by the Strong Force aside from
time dilation effects.
Ken


Idiot. Interstellar space is Minkowski. Tell us how many gees you
would need to extend a 14.76 *minute* half-life to 100 million years.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
  #43  
Old October 31st 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,805
Default Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities

Dear Uncle Al:

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote:

Dear Uncle Al:

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote:

Dear Uncle Al:

"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote:

Dear Eric Gisse:
"Eric Gisse" wrote in message
om...
(Titan Point) wrote in message
. com...
[snip]

The detection of neutrons from distant supernovae

COOL.

Cite? I have never heard of that!

TitanPoint may mean this...
URL:
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0405/0405006.pdf
(plenty more with Google Advanced, requiring the word "supernova"
and
the
exact phrase "detection of neutrons")

The neutron is what is detected, in the decay/interaction of
*neutrinos*
from supernovae. With a halflife of 10 minutes, not many neutrons
would
survive from distant supernovae.

Or it might have been a boo-boo.

Or the OP was an even more loathsome spewing idiot that you are.

Thanks, Al. Coming from you, this is a compliment.

Hey
stupid, what is the nominal half-life of a neutron?

I think I said 10 minutes above, didn't I? Are you due for a
dipstick
check?

Neutron half-life is about 885.6 seconds, idiot. Pull your thumb out
when you spew information.


URL:http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...proton.html#c3
QUOTE
A free neutron will decay with a half-life of about 10.3 minutes
END QUOTE

I don't know where your information comes from, but it is apparently not
correct.

http://pdg.lbl.gov/

[snip]

Idiot. 14.76 minutes.


You should *not* get your information from idiots, Uncle Al.

Your citation points to a different number for the lifespan of the neutron,
the "mean life", and a host of values are presented:
URL:http://pdg.lbl.gov/2004/listings/bxxxcomb.html
... choosing the entry for neutrons:
"PostScript PDF (17 pages) n"
QUOTE
Mean life
[...snip...]
885.7 +/- 0.8
886.8 +/- 1.2
885.4 +/- 0.9
889.2 +/- 3.0
882.6 +/- 2.7
888.4 +/- 3.1
887.6 +/- 3.0
891 +/- 9
888.4 +/- 2.9
893.6 +/- 3.8
878 +/- 27
877 +/- 10
876 +/- 10
903 +/- 13
937 +/- 18
875 +/- 95
881 +/- 8
END QUOTE

Note that the "mean life" and the "half life" can be mathematically
correlated.

So Uncle Al, who is the spewing idiot? *You* stated "half life", but
quoted figures for "mean life".

I think you need another beer... I hope this doesn't mean your eotvos
project has been sidetracked?

David A. Smith


  #44  
Old October 31st 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Ken S. Tucker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,674
Default Eleaticus (2004) Absurdities

Uncle Al wrote in message ...
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote:

Uncle Al wrote in message ...

Neutron half-life is about 885.6 seconds,


Relatively to whom?, You of course.

Put a neutron in a powerful g-field or
something similiar, inside a nucleus
(think super-gravity) and the 1/2 life
gets extended.

Likely the neutron is stabilized from
decay by the Strong Force aside from
time dilation effects.
Ken


Idiot. Interstellar space is Minkowski. Tell us how many gees you
would need to extend a 14.76 *minute* half-life to 100 million years.


Aunt Alice,
Ref, G_uv =k*T_uv
where T_uv has a density of billions of tons/cubic inch.
Care to use your abacus to determine time dilation
in that nuclear density?
I do not know if the dilation is sufficient to
impede the decay of the neutron in that density
field, do you?

Ken S. Tucker

VOTE CREATIVE
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When "Specified" Inertial Frames Suddenly Become Just "Generalized" Frames G. L. Bradford Physics - General Discussion 10 January 9th 06 04:00 PM
Solutions to field equations and maxwell equations Michael S. The Theory of Relativity 1 September 11th 04 03:46 PM
Impulse Equations For Rigid Body Collisons, Are these Equations Right? John Alway Physics - General Discussion 4 July 2nd 04 05:34 PM
Combinations of viewing frames from other frames Mark Hendy The Theory of Relativity 2 September 22nd 03 06:01 AM
Einstein Field Equations and the equations of motion Bill Hobba Current Physics Research (Moderated) 1 September 4th 03 05:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Debt Consolidation - Credit Card Consolidation - Credit Card Debt Consolidation - Credit Cards - Online Advertising