![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: faq, galilean, invariant, laws, transformations |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Ads |
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
|
Your sleazy-minded innuendoes are not appreciated. I do not discuss
things with smutty-minded perverts. Does your wife even know that she is married to a disgusting pervert. Maybe somebody should tell her what an absolute jerk you are. *plonk* (Ken S. Tucker) wrote in message . com... (Judith Hardy) wrote in message . com... (Ken S. Tucker) wrote in message . com... (David McAnally) wrote in message ... "Androcles" writes: To Androcles McAnally, shadows with the pseudonym Speicher, enjoy your tour into the psychotic world of ultra kook dom, the're trolls, by any other name. Ken I have not posted to this newsgroup for some time, but your comments make me want to puke. Yes, I read your post Judith, and I think I could arrange for a bit of "morning sickness" you want. When? Your disgusting and derisive comments were also made without making any genuine contribution to the thread. Your empty-headed tripe makes you a troll, because you waste everybody's time with your comment. You also made your response knowing full-well that neither Speicher nor McAnally would ever get to see it and that they would not be able to defend themselves against your unwarranted abuse. Speicher will not be able to read your post because he no longer reads the group, and McAnally will not be able to read your post because he has you kill filed (both of these are public knowledge). Attacking people who have no recourse to respond is the action of a yellow-bellied coward. So you interested in the color of my belly are you, I'm beginning to like you. It is interesting that you did not see fit to write explaining what you thought was so wrong with what McAnally wrote, and making specific objections to his points. Presumably you do not understand what the discussion was about, and, therefore, were not able to any worthwhile comments or contributions. It is interesting that you used 'trolls' to rudely attack two people who have no recourse to answer you, when you, yourself, are a troll of the worst kind. It is evident that you are actually describing yourself and your own nature, when you use the word 'troll' (after all, you were the person who introduced this epithet). Yes, I was terribly mean, I'll make it up to you. Androcles is a well-known fool, and his connection with reality has been served no useful purpose when you treat him as if he was more intelligent than he actually is, as you have done above. Oh, that's a sure sign of affection, you and I could gossip about the neighbours after were done getting you started on "morning sickness". Is there any truth to the rumour that you changed one letter in your name from an 'F' to a 'T'? None at all, but thanks for asking. It's not everyday a woman e-travels 12,000 miles to flirt with me. I'd would have stuck with "F" but I got to many messages from all them beautiful starlets, but since the most beautiful women come from Australia I thought I'd use "Tucker", meaning "I nourish the babes". When? Ken F Tucker |
|
#93
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message om... (Judith Hardy) wrote in message . com... [snip] Androcles is a well-known fool, and his connection with reality has been served no useful purpose when you treat him as if he was more intelligent than he actually is, as you have done above. It is interesting that she did not see fit to write explaining what she thought was so wrong with what Androcles wrote, and making specific objections to his points. Androcles |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws | Paul Stowe | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 25th 05 06:47 AM |
| Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws | Uncle Al | Physics - General Discussion | 93 | November 29th 04 11:34 PM |
| Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws | Uncle Al | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | November 17th 04 02:32 PM |
| Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws | Uncle Al | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | November 1st 04 04:30 PM |
| Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws | Uncle Al | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | September 30th 04 06:56 PM |