![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: electric, fields, problem, transformation |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi,
I've got a potentially easy problem with the relativistic transformations for the electrical fields, perhaps someone can help me out. I can't figure it out. Assume you've got an infinite sheet of charge in motion. Then according to Maxwell's equations, there will be a constant E-field perpendicular to the sheet, plus a wave starting out from the sheet the moment it is set in motion with E- and B-fields perpendicular to the direction of propagation of the field and perpendicular to each other. That is, there will be a component of the E-field *parallel* to the plane of the sheet as long as the sheet is in motion.(cf. e.g. Feynman Lectures Vol. 2 18-4). If we consider the inertial system where the sheet of charge is at rest, there will be no current and therefore no B-field. The charge density changes, but that should have an effect only upon the E-field perpendicular to the plane. That is, as far as I can see, there should be no field at all *parallel* to the plane. But according to the relativistic transformation formulas for the E-field, the component of the E-field parallel to the motion of the inertial system in which the field is to be transformed, is unchanged. That is, it should be zero still in an inertial system moving relatively to the sheet of charge, i.e. a system where the sheet moves. So why is it that according to Maxwell's equations there should be such a parallel component of the field? Any ideas? |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Moving electric fields | Robert Finch | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | September 18th 04 03:14 AM |
| New Transformation Equations and the Electric Field Four-vector(7/11/04) | davidoff404 | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
| New Transformation Equations and the Electric Field Four-vector (7/11/04) | Bilge | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 12th 04 11:03 AM |
| New Transformation Equations and the Electric Field Four-vector(11/10/03) | Sam Wormley | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | November 11th 03 04:45 PM |
| New Transformation Equations and the Electric Field Four-vector(11/1/03) | Uncle Al | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | November 1st 03 11:17 PM |