A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » The Theory of Relativity
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

problem with transformation of electric fields



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 7th 04 posted to sci.physics.relativity
Ulrich Leininger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default problem with transformation of electric fields

Hi,

I've got a potentially easy problem with the relativistic
transformations for the electrical fields, perhaps someone can help me
out. I can't figure it out.

Assume you've got an infinite sheet of charge in motion. Then
according to Maxwell's equations, there will be a constant E-field
perpendicular to the sheet, plus a wave starting out from the sheet
the moment it is set in motion with E- and B-fields perpendicular to
the direction of propagation of the field and perpendicular to each
other. That is, there will be a component of the E-field *parallel* to
the plane of the sheet as long as the sheet is in motion.(cf. e.g.
Feynman Lectures Vol. 2 18-4).

If we consider the inertial system where the sheet of charge is at
rest, there will be no current and therefore no B-field. The charge
density changes, but that should have an effect only upon the E-field
perpendicular to the plane. That is, as far as I can see, there should
be no field at all *parallel* to the plane.

But according to the relativistic transformation formulas for the
E-field, the component of the E-field parallel to the motion of the
inertial system in which the field is to be transformed, is unchanged.
That is, it should be zero still in an inertial system moving
relatively to the sheet of charge, i.e. a system where the sheet
moves.

So why is it that according to Maxwell's equations there should be
such a parallel component of the field? Any ideas?
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Moving electric fields Robert Finch Physics - General Discussion 5 September 18th 04 03:14 AM
New Transformation Equations and the Electric Field Four-vector(7/11/04) davidoff404 Physics - General Discussion 2 July 13th 04 12:00 AM
New Transformation Equations and the Electric Field Four-vector (7/11/04) Bilge Physics - General Discussion 0 July 12th 04 11:03 AM
New Transformation Equations and the Electric Field Four-vector(11/10/03) Sam Wormley Physics - General Discussion 0 November 11th 03 04:45 PM
New Transformation Equations and the Electric Field Four-vector(11/1/03) Uncle Al Physics - General Discussion 0 November 1st 03 11:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2009 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Car Loan - Debt Consolidation - Corn Hole - Find a Credit Card - Car Loan