Eleaticus wrote:
[snip lies]

Archive-Name: physics-faq/criticism/functions-unknown
Version: 0.02.01

Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence (FAQ)
(c) Eleaticus/Oren C. Webster

[snip trolled garbage]

Originally trolled across sci.physics sci.physics.relativity
alt.physics sci.math sci.answers alt.answers news.answers

Psychotic ineducable boring troll Eleaticus,

You see yourself this way,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete6.jpg
The entire remainder of the planet sees you this way,
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/effete3.png

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.swf
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
http://www.you-moron.com/

http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
http://www.firehead.org/~jessh/film/kubrick/Kubrick-Psycho.html
http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html

Hey, stooopid troll Eleaticus - Do you want EVIDENCE? Each of the 24
GPS satellites carries either four cesium atomic clocks or three
rubidum atomic clocks in orbit, with full relativistic corrections
being applied.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/RelWWW/tests.html
Mathematics of gravitation
http://wugrav.wustl.edu/people/CMW/update98.pdf
http://www.astro.northwestern.edu/AspenW04/Papers/lorimer1.pdf
Equivalence Principle testing
http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0111236
Geometric structure of reality
http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/0307140
GR structure, especially Part 4/p. 7
http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume4/2001-4will/index.html
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039
http://www.weburbia.demon.co.uk/physics/experiments.html
Experimental constraints on General Relativity.
http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/ptti2002/paper20.pdf
Nature 425 374 (2003)
http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby/index.html
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjjacob/Lecture16.pdf
Relativity in the GPS system
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9909014
Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 121101
falling light
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/airtim.html
Hafele-Keating Experiment
http://www.hawaii.edu/suremath/SRtwinParadox.html
http://physics.syr.edu/courses/modules/LIGHTCONE/twins.html
Twin Paradox
Science 303(5661) 1143;1153 (2004)
http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0401086
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312071
Deeply relativistic neutron star binaries
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0405160
Black hole evaporation
http://www.npl.washington.edu/eotwash/pdf/prl83-3585.pdf
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0301024
Nordtvedt Effect
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0403292
http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0310723
WMAP + Sloane Digital Sky Survey
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0404175
Dark matter candidates
http://nedwww.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/March01/Carroll/frames.html
Carroll on what it all means.

NIM A 355 537 (1995)
Physics Letters B 328 103 (1994)
Physical Review Letters 64 1697 (1990)
Physical Review Letters 39 1051 (1977)
Physical Review 135 B1071 (1964)
Physics Letters 12 260 (1964)
Europhysics Letters 56(2) 170-174 (2001)
General Relativity and Gravitation 34(9) 1371 (2002)

http://fourmilab.to/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf
http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/ae_1905_error.htm
http://www.physics.gatech.edu/people/faculty/finkelstein/relativity.pdf
http://users.powernet.co.uk/bearsoft/Paper6.pdf
http://users.powernet.co.uk/bearsoft/LPHrel.html
Longitudinal and transverse mass

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/gpsuser/gpsuser.pdf
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/sigspec/default.htm
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/icd200/default.htm
http://www.trimble.com/gps/index.html
http://sirius.chinalake.navy.mil/satpred/
http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog/mog9/node9.html
http://egtphysics.net/GPS/RelGPS.htm
http://www.schriever.af.mil/gps/Current/current.oa1
http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html
http://www-astronomy.mps.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:10 -0700, Uncle Al
wrote:

[snip lies]

Large amount of paper that hardly any have read doesnt prove anything
(in either sides). Only copy pasting like in universities where teacher's
marks from papers goes to students papers without pasting their brains.

Science is much like religion like math.

Keckman wrote:

Science is much like religion like math.

Science taught badly is no better than theology taught well.

Bob Kolker

wrote in message ...
Haven't been here long, have you?

Eleaticus is a long time troll here who has never responded
to any discussion of any of his/her posts.

You wouldn't lie would you?

Why doesn't this person post using a real name?

Idiot. Virtually everyone here knows my 'real' name, and spent years rplying
to you and Jom "The Liar" Carr, the #2 poster (Anderson (sp)), and others.

What do you gain by lying about something so trivial?

eleaticus

Keckman wrote:

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:55:10 -0700, Uncle Al
wrote:

[snip lies]

Large amount of paper that hardly any have read doesnt prove anything
(in either sides). Only copy pasting like in universities where teacher's
marks from papers goes to students papers without pasting their brains.

Science is much like religion like math.

Haven't been here long, have you?

Eleaticus is a long time troll here who has never responded
to any discussion of any of his/her posts.

Why doesn't this person post using a real name?

John Anderson

"robert j. kolker" wrote in message ...
Keckman wrote:

Science is much like religion like math.

Science taught badly is no better than theology taught well.

Science taught *well* OTOH is a great thing. It's just uncommon, at
least until undergraduate level and sometimes not even then. This
isn't the fault of the teachers, but of the bad material they are
forced to work with.

And I couldn't help noticing that the original post said nothing but a
header followed by "this document is under reconstruction" or words to
that effect - the perils of automated posting.

On 1 Oct 2004 03:47:24 -0700,
wrote:

"robert j. kolker" wrote in message

Science taught badly is no better than theology taught well.

Science taught *well* OTOH is a great thing.

I think and taught that i think that

this is true = limes(science)=truth, alltgough science never is truth,

but those has belive for some religion think that religion=true

science-truth, religion=truth where (=) is question of people's
believe's of who say something and who don't and who to belive
- same as in science, but...



--
Petri Keckman